POLİTİK RİSK ANALİZ YÖNTEMLERİ VE RİSK DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİNDE KARŞILAŞILAN BAZI SORUNLAR

Year 1997, , 187 - 191, 01.01.1997

Ercan Gegez

https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.727054

Abstract

One of the most challenging dimensions of the international business environment is political constraints. Given the politically complicated world structııre, every firm should be able to analyze the political risk before entering a foreigıı market. However, this task is not easy to do many times. Firms must face the fact that they will always experience the troubles of political risk analysis. This study focuses attention on some major problems of political risk analyzing in international environment.

Keywords

POLİTİK RİSK ANALİZ YÖNTEMLERİ, RİSK DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ, POLİTİK RİSK

References

• [1] -Cateora, Philip R., (1985), Strategic International Marketing, Dow-Jones Irwin, s. 50.
• [2] -Haner, F.T. (1979), “Rating Investment Risks Abroad”, Business Horizons, April, s. 14.
• [3] -Schmidt, David A. (1986), “Analyzing Political Risk”, Business Horizons, July-August, s.44.
• [4] -Rice, Gillian; Mahmoud, Essam (1986), “A Managerial Procedure For Political Risk Forecasting”, Management International Review, Vol.26, Nıunber4, s. 15,16,18.
• [5] -Dichtl, Envin, Köglmayr, Georg (1986), “Country Risk Ratings”, Management International Review, Vol. 26, Number 4, s. 4.
• [6] -Wu, Friedrich W. (1982), “The Political Risk Of Foreign Direct Investment in Post-Mao-Chiııa: A Preliminary Assessment”, Management hıtemational Review, Volüme 22, Number 1, s. 13-25.
• [7] -Rummel R..1.. Heenan. David A. (1978), “Ho\v Multmatioııals Analyze Political Risk”, Harvard Business Review, January - February, s.69.
• [8] -Mascarenhas, Briance; Atherton, Clifford (1983), “Problems hı Political Risk Assessment”, Management hıtemational Revievv, Vol 23, No. 2, s. 22-32.
• [9]-Harvev, Miclıael G. (1983), “Multinatioııal Corporatioııs Mass Media Strategy Wlıeıı Dealing Witlı Terrorists, World Marketing Congress 1983, s. 184.