THE CONSTRUCTION OF NEOLIBERAL HEGEMONY IN THE GLOBAL GOVERNANCE OF MIGRATION AND REFUGEES

Year 2022, Volume: 17 Issue: 57, 468 - 491, 30.01.2022

Beyza Çağatay Tekin , Barış Tekin

https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.992043

Abstract

This article examines the “Global Compact on Refugees” and the “Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration”, adopting a Neo-Gramscian International Political Economy perspective. Both products of the United Nations New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants, these two non-binding agreements aim to restructure global governance of migration and refugees in accordance with neoliberal ideology. Following the global compacts, transnational capital has become one of the leading actors in the design and implementation of the international refugee protection regime. This study contends that these recent developments reveal the attempts of a transnational historic bloc to establish neoliberal hegemony in global governance of migration and refugee movements.

Keywords

Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, Global Compact on Refugees, Transnational capitalist class, Neo-Gramscian international political economy, Neoliberal hegemony

DÜZENSİZ GÖÇ VE MÜLTECİ HAREKETLERİNİN YÖNETİMİNDE NEOLİBERAL HEGEMONYA ARAYIŞLARI

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Birleşmiş Milletler Mülteciler ve Göçmenler için New York Bildirisinin ardından uluslararası göç ve mülteci hareketlerinin yönetimine yönelik olarak hayata geçirilen “Güvenli, Sistemli ve Düzenli Göç için Küresel Mutabakat” ve “Mültecilere İlişkin Küresel Mutabakat” isimli iki çok taraflı düzenlemeyi Yeni- Gramşiyan (Neo-Gramscian) Uluslararası Politik Ekonomi kuramı ışığında değerlendirmektedir. Bu mutabakatlar, küresel göç yönetişimi ve uluslararası mülteci koruma rejimini neoliberal ideoloji ekseninde yeniden şekillendirmektedir. Küresel mutabakatların ardından ulusötesi sermaye, göçmen ve mültecilere yönelik küresel politikaların karar ve uygulama aşamalarında belirleyici rol oynayan aktörlerden biri haline gelmiştir. Çalışmada, göç ve mülteci hareketlerinin yönetimi alanında yaşanan dönüşümün küreselleşmenin bugünkü aşamasında ortaya çıkan ulusötesi bir tarihsel bloğun neoliberal hegemonya arayışı olarak değerlendirilmesinin doğru olacağı öne sürülmektedir.

Keywords

Güvenli Sistemli ve Düzenli Göç için Küresel Mutabakat, Mültecilere İlişkin Küresel Mutabakat, Neoliberal hegemonya, Ulusötesi kapitalist sınıf, Yeni-Gramşiyan uluslararası politik ekonomi

References

• Akçoraoğlu, A. (2017). Avrupa Birliği’nde Neo-Liberal Hegemonya, Otoriter Neo-Liberalizm ve Neo-Gramsciyen Uluslararası Politik İktisat Teorisi. Alternatif Politika, 9(1), 1-34.
• Allinson, K., Erdunast, E., Guild, E., & Basaran, T.(2019).The Legal Status of the UN’s Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration in International and UK Law”, Refugee Law Initiative, GCM Commentary, 31 Ocak 2019, https://rli.blogs.sas.ac.uk/2019/01/31/gcm-commentary-the-legal-status/
• Baban, F., Ilcan, S., & Rygiel, K. (2017). Syrian refugees in Turkey: Pathways to precarity, differential inclusion, and negotiated citizenship rights. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(1), 41-57.
• Baldwin, Robert (2013) “Global supply chains: why they emerged, why they matter, and where they are going”, in D. Elms and P. Low (eds): Global Value Chains in a Changing World. WTO Publications, Geneva. (ss. 13-61)
• Betts, A., & Collier, P. (2015). Help refugees help themselves: Let displaced Syrians join the labor market. Foreign Affairs, 94(6), 84-92.
• Betts, A., & Collier, P. (2017). Refuge: Transforming a broken refugee system. Penguin UK.
• Bieler, A. & Morton A. D. (2004). A Critical Theory Route to Hegemony, World Order and Historical Change: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Relations. Capital & Class, 28(1), 85-113.
• Caro, L. P. (2020). Syrian Refugees in the Turkish Labour Market. ILO Office in Turkey. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---europe/---ro-geneva/---ilo-ankara/documents/publication/wcms_738602.pdf
• Chimni, B. S. (2018). Global compact on refugees: One step forward, two steps back. International Journal of Refugee Law, 30(4), ss. 630-634.
• Cox, R. W. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126-155.
• Cox, R. W. (1983) “Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method. Millennium: Journal of International Studies ,12(2), 162-175.
• Cox, R. W. (1987). Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Cox, R. W. (1993). Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. In S. Gill (Ed.), Cambridge studies in international relations: Vol. 26. Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations (pp. 49–66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Cox, R., & Schechter, M. G. (2003). The political economy of a plural world: critical reflections on power, morals and civilisation. Routledge.
• Dierckx, S. (2013). After the crisis and beyond the new constitutionalism? The case of the free movement of capital. Globalizations, 10(6), 803-818.
• Fellesson, M. (2021). From Roll-Out to Reverse: Understanding Tanzania’s Withdrawal from the Comprehensive Refugee Response Framework (CRRF). Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(3), 2699-2719.
• Gilbert, G. (2019). Not Bound but Committed: Operationalizing the Global Compact on Refugees. International Migration, 57(6), 27-42.
• Gill, S. (1998). New constitutionalism, democratization and global political economy. Pacifica Review: Peace, Security & Global Change, 10(1), 23-38.
• Gill, S. (2002). Constitutionalizing inequality and the clash of globalizations”, International Studies Review, 4(2), 47-66.
• Gill, S. R., & Law, D. (1989). Global hegemony and the structural power of capital. International Studies Quarterly, 33(4), 475-499.
• Gilpin, R. (2016). The political economy of international relations. Princeton University Press.
• Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 19 December 2018, United Nations, A/RES/73/195, 2018. https://www.unhcr.org/gcr/GCR_English.pdf
• Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Hoare, Quintin and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith (Der.) London: Lawrence and Wishart.
• Guild, E., Basaran, T., & Allinson, K. (2019). From Zero to Hero? An analysis of the human rights protections within the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM). International Migration, 57(6), 43-59.
• Jubilut, L. L., & Casagrande, M. M. (2019). Shortcomings and/or Missed Opportunities of the Global Compacts for the Protection of Forced Migrants. International Migration, 57(6), 139-157.
• Klein-Solomon M., & Sheldon, S. (2018). The Global Compact for Migration: From the Sustainable Development Goals to a Comprehensive Agreement on Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. International Journal of Refugee Law, 30 (4), 584-590.
• Lenner, K., & Turner, L. (2018). Learning from the Jordan compact. Forced Migration Review, 57, 48-51.
• Machacek, M. (2018). Global public–private partnerships and the new constitutionalism of the refugee regime. Global Constitutionalism, 7(2), 204- 235.
• McAdam, J., & Wood, T. (2021). The Concept of “International Protection” in the Global Compacts on Refugees and Migration. Interventions. 23(2), 191-206.
• İneli-Ciğer, M. (2019). The Global Compact on Refugees and Burden Sharing: Will the Compact Address the Normative Gap Concerning Burden Sharing? Refugee Survey Quarterly, 38(2), 115-138.
• Morris, J. (2020). Extractive Landscapes: The Case of the Jordan Refugee Compact. Refuge, 36(1), 87–96.
• Newland, K. (2018). The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration: An Unlikely Achievement. International Journal of Refugee Law, 30 (4), 657-660.
• Nyers, Peter. (2019). “Humanitarian hubris in the global compacts on refugees and migration”, Global Affairs, 5(2), 171-178.
• New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 19 September 2016, United Nations, A/RES/71/1, 2016. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_71_1.pdf
• Oelgemöller, C. (2021.) The Global Compacts, Mixed Migration and the Transformation of Protection. Interventions, 23(2), 183-190.
• Özen, Ç. (2005). Neogramşiyan Hegemonya Yaklaşımı Çerçevesinde Güç ve Global Finans: Pax Britannica’daki Büyük Dönüşüm. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 2 (8), 3-31.
• Robinson, W. I. (2002). Küresel kapitalizm ve ulusötesi kapitalist hegemonya: Kuramsal notlar ve görgül deliller. Praksis, 8, 125-168.
• Robinson, W. I. & Harris, J. (2000). Towards a Global Ruling Class? Globalization and the Transnational Capitalist Class. Science & Society, 64(1), 11-54.
• Rudolf, M. (2019). Share the burden or pass it on?. International Migration, 57(6), 208-223.
• Sklair, L. (2001). The transnational capitalist class. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Stel, N. (2020). Hybrid Political Order and the Politics of Uncertainty: Refugee Governance in Lebanon. London: Routledge.
• Şenalp, M. G., & Şenalp, Ö. (2009). Ulusötesi Kapitalizm: Sermayenin ve Devletin Ulusötesileşmesi ve Türkiye’de Ulusötesi Tarihsel Blok Oluşumu. Praksis, 19, 191-240.
• Tekdal, V. (2017). Dünya Düzeni ve Hegemonya: Neo-Gramşiyan Yaklaşımlar. Yalvaç F. (Ed.). Tarihsel Materyalizm ve Uluslararası İlişkiler. (ss.215-248) .Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları.
• Tekin, Beyza Ç. (2014). Is the European Union a Normative Power? A Reappraisal Following the Eurozone Crisis. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 36(2), 327-348.
• Tekin, Beyza Ç. (2017). Düzensiz Göçün Yönetimi Konusunda varılan Türkiye-AB Mutabakatının Avrupa Birliği’nin Uluslararası Kimliği üzerindeki etkileri. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 39(2), 659-680.
• Tekin, Beyza Ç. (2019). A Reappraisal of EU-Turkey Cooperation on Migration Management. Refugee Crises and Migration Policies: From Local to Global, 45.
• Tekin, Beyza Ç. (2021). Uluslararası Göç ve Mülteci Hareketliliğine Yönelik Yeni Küresel Düzenlemeler: Eleştirel Bir Değerlendirme. Beril Dedeoğlu’na Armağan. Galatasaray Üniversitesi Yayınları, (ss. 331-359).
• Türk, V. (2018). The Promise and Potential of the Global Compact on Refugees. International Journal of Refugee Law, 30(4), 575-583.
• Webber, F. (2018). Refusing refuge. Race & Class, 59(3), 98-105.
• Yalvaç, F. (2010). Eleştirel Gerçekçilik: Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramında Post-Pozitivizm Sonrası Aşama. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 6(24), 3-32.
• Vurdu, S. A. (2019). “Uluslararası Ticarette Trendlerin Değişimi Sürecinde Türkiye’de Elektrikli Ürünler Sektörünün Uluslararası Rekabet Gücü”, Demir, A. O. (ed) içinde, Değişen rekabetçilik: makro ve mikro değerlendirmeler Nobel Bilimsel Eserler, ss. 95-116.
• Zetter, R. (2021). Theorizing the refugee humanitarian-development nexus: a political-economy analysis. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(2), 1766-1786.