Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Bir Refah Devleti Analizi: Ekonomik ve Sosyal Sonuçlar

Year 2017, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 219 - 243, 27.10.2017
https://doi.org/10.14782/sbd.2017.73

Abstract

Kokenlerini
farkl
ı tarihsel miraslardan alan refah devletleri, gelişimsel cizgiler acısından farklılık

gostermişlerdir ve icinden gectikleri tarihsel surec, farklı refah rejimlerinin oluşmasına kaynaklık

etmiştir. Her biri farklı
bir refah kapitalizmi dunyas
ı sunan refah devletleri, barındırdığı
belirgin

farklılıklara rağmen
ce
şitli varoluşsal benzerlikler taşımaktadırlar. Bu calışmanın amacı,
refah

devletlerinin
baz
ı ekonomik ve politik uygulamalar acısından barındırdığı farklılıkların kabulu ile

birlikte
temelde hizmet etmeleri beklenilen baz
ı
ortak hedefler ac
ısından
bir de
ğerlendirme yapmaktır.

Refah
devletine dair niteleyici bir cerceve olu
şturmak
ad
ına calışmada dort farklı ekonomik ve sosyal

durum
analiz edilmi
ştir. 17 farklı OECD ulke verisi ile dinamik panel
veri analizinin kullan
ıldığı

calışma sonucları, refah devletinin ekonomik buyume,
genel istihdam, kad
ın istihdamı ve genel refah 

uzerinde
pozitif etkiye sahip oldu
ğunu gostermiştir.

References

  • Ahn, S.H., Kim, S.W. (2015) “Social Investment, Social Service and the Economic Performance of Welfare States”, Int J Soc Welfare, 24, pp.109–119.
  • Asongua, S. A., Nwachukwub, J. C. (2016) “Welfare Spending and Quality of Growth in Developing Countries: A Note on Evidence from Hopefuls, Contenders and Best Performers”, The Social Science Journal, 53, pp.495–500.
  • Atkinson, A. B. (1995) “Incomes and the Welfare State: Essays on Britain and Europe”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  • Baltagi, B. H. (2008) “Forecasting with Panel Data”, Journal of Forecasting, 27, pp.153–173. Brady, D. (2005) “The Welfare State and Relative Poverty in Rich Western Democracies, 1967-1997”, Social Forces, 83- 4, pp. 1329-1364.
  • Castles, F. G., Dowrick S. (1990) “The Impact of Goverment Spending Levels on Medium Term Economic Growth in the OECD, 1960-19851”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2-2, pp. 173-204.
  • Clayton, R., Pontusson, J. (1998) “Welfare-State Retrenchment Revisited: Entitlement Cuts, Public Sector Restructuring, and Inegalitarian Trends in Advanced Capitalist Societies”, World Politics, 51- 1, pp. 67-98.
  • Dumitrescu, E. I., Hurlin, C. (2012) “Testing for Granger Non-Causality in Heterogeneous Panels”, Economic Modelling, 29, pp.1450–1460.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Gao, H., Zhaı, F., Yang, S., Lı, S. (2014) “Does Welfare Enable Family Expenditures on Human Capital? Evidence from China”, World Development, 64, pp. 219–231.
  • Hansson, P., Henrekson M. (1994) “A New Framework for Testing the Effect of Government Spending on Growth and Productivity”, Public Choice, 81- ¾, pp. 381-401.
  • Headey, B., Goodin, R. E., Muffels, R. (1999) Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge University Press.
  • Headey, B., Goodin R. E., Muffels, R., Dirven, H. (1997) “Welfare over Time: Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism in Panel Perspective”, Journal of Public Policy, 17- 3, pp. 329-359.
  • Headey, B., Goodin R. E., Muffels, R., Dirven, H. (2000) “Is There a Trade-Off Between Economic Efficiency and a Generous Welfare State? A Comparison of Best Cases of The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism”, Social Indicators Research, 50- 2, pp. 115-157.
  • Heijink, R., Koolman X., Gert P. (2013) “Spending More Money, Saving More Lives? The Relationship Between Avoidable Mortality and Healthcare Spending in 14 Countries” The European Journal of Health Economics, 14- 3, pp. 527-538
  • Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. (2003) “Testingfor Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 115, pp. 53-74.
  • Johansen, S. (1988) “Statistical Analysis Of Cointegration Vectors”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,12, pp. 231-254.
  • Kangas, O. (1991) “The Bigger the Better? On the Dimensions of Welfare State Development: Social Expenditures Versus Social Rights”, Acta Sociologica, 34- 1, pp.33-44.
  • Kao, C. (1999) “Spurious Regression and Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data”, Journal of Econometrics, 90, pp.1-44.
  • Kenworthy, L. (1999) “Do Social-Welfare Policies Reduce Poverty? A Cross-National Assessment”, Social Forces, 77- 3, pp.1119-1139.
  • Korpi, W. (1985) “Economic Growth and the Welfare State: Leaky Bucket or Irrigation System?”, European Sociological Review, 1- 2, pp.97-118.
  • Levin, A., Lin, C-F., Chu, C.S.J. (2002) “Unit Root Tests In Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties”, Journal of Econometrics, 108 pp.1–24.
  • Mingione, E. (2011) “Güney Avrupa Refah Modeli ve Yoksulluk ve Sosyal Dışlanmaya Karşı Mücadele”, içinde A. Buğra ve Ç. Keyder (der.), Sosyal Politika Yazıları. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları: 261-287.
  • Maddala, G. S., Wu, S. (1999) “A Comparative Study Of Unit Root Tests With Panel Data And A New Simple Test”, Oxford Bulletin Of Economics And Statistics, Special Issue (1999) 0305-9049, pp. 631-653.
  • Mandel, H., Semyonov, M. (2006) “A Welfare State Paradox: State Interventions and Women’s Employment Opportunities in 22 Countries”, American Journal of Sociology, 111 – 6, pp.1910-1949.
  • OECD, (2014), OECD Employment Outlook 2014, OECD Publishing.
  • OECD, 10 Aralık 2016, Labour Force Statistics, (Çevrimiçi) http://stats.oecd.org.
  • OECD,10 Aralık 2016, Social Expenditure Database (SOCX), (Çevrimiçi) http://stats.oecd.org.
  • Pacek, A., Radcliff, B. (2008) “Assessing the Welfare State: The Politics of Happiness”, Perspectives on Politics, 6- 2, pp.267-277.
  • Palme, J. (2006) “Welfare States and Inequality: Institutional Designs and Distributive Outcome”, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 24, pp.87–403.
  • Pedroni, P. (2000) “Fully Modified Ols For Heterogeneous Cointegrated Panels”, Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels, 15, pp.93–130.
  • Persson, T., Tabellini, G. (1994). “Is Inequality Harmful For Growth?”, American Economic Review, 76-1, pp.191–203.
  • Ryan, P. (2003) “The State of the Welfare State”, Review of Income and Wealth, 49-1, pp.135-45.
  • Shim, J. (2015) “Social Welfare Expenditures and Infant Mortality Social Welfare Expenditures and Infant Mortality, Social Work in Public Health, 30:7, pp. 567-577.
  • Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2013) İleri Panel Veri Analizi, İstanbul: Beta Basım.
  • Taydas, Z., Peksen, D. (2012) “Can States Buy Peace? Social Welfare Spending and Civil Conflicts”, Journal of Peace Research, 49- 2, pp. 273-287.
  • Weede, E. (1991) “The Impact of State Power on Economic Growth Rates In OECD Countries”, Quality and Quantity, 25-4, pp.421–438.
  • World Bank: 10 Aralık 2016, World Data Bank World Development Indicators, (Çevrimiçi) http://databank. worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators,
  • Zwiers, M., Koster, F. (2015) “The local structure of the welfare state: Uneven effects of Social Spending on Poverty Within Countries”, Urban Studies, 52-1, pp. 87–102.
Year 2017, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 219 - 243, 27.10.2017
https://doi.org/10.14782/sbd.2017.73

Abstract

References

  • Ahn, S.H., Kim, S.W. (2015) “Social Investment, Social Service and the Economic Performance of Welfare States”, Int J Soc Welfare, 24, pp.109–119.
  • Asongua, S. A., Nwachukwub, J. C. (2016) “Welfare Spending and Quality of Growth in Developing Countries: A Note on Evidence from Hopefuls, Contenders and Best Performers”, The Social Science Journal, 53, pp.495–500.
  • Atkinson, A. B. (1995) “Incomes and the Welfare State: Essays on Britain and Europe”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  • Baltagi, B. H. (2008) “Forecasting with Panel Data”, Journal of Forecasting, 27, pp.153–173. Brady, D. (2005) “The Welfare State and Relative Poverty in Rich Western Democracies, 1967-1997”, Social Forces, 83- 4, pp. 1329-1364.
  • Castles, F. G., Dowrick S. (1990) “The Impact of Goverment Spending Levels on Medium Term Economic Growth in the OECD, 1960-19851”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2-2, pp. 173-204.
  • Clayton, R., Pontusson, J. (1998) “Welfare-State Retrenchment Revisited: Entitlement Cuts, Public Sector Restructuring, and Inegalitarian Trends in Advanced Capitalist Societies”, World Politics, 51- 1, pp. 67-98.
  • Dumitrescu, E. I., Hurlin, C. (2012) “Testing for Granger Non-Causality in Heterogeneous Panels”, Economic Modelling, 29, pp.1450–1460.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Gao, H., Zhaı, F., Yang, S., Lı, S. (2014) “Does Welfare Enable Family Expenditures on Human Capital? Evidence from China”, World Development, 64, pp. 219–231.
  • Hansson, P., Henrekson M. (1994) “A New Framework for Testing the Effect of Government Spending on Growth and Productivity”, Public Choice, 81- ¾, pp. 381-401.
  • Headey, B., Goodin, R. E., Muffels, R. (1999) Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge University Press.
  • Headey, B., Goodin R. E., Muffels, R., Dirven, H. (1997) “Welfare over Time: Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism in Panel Perspective”, Journal of Public Policy, 17- 3, pp. 329-359.
  • Headey, B., Goodin R. E., Muffels, R., Dirven, H. (2000) “Is There a Trade-Off Between Economic Efficiency and a Generous Welfare State? A Comparison of Best Cases of The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism”, Social Indicators Research, 50- 2, pp. 115-157.
  • Heijink, R., Koolman X., Gert P. (2013) “Spending More Money, Saving More Lives? The Relationship Between Avoidable Mortality and Healthcare Spending in 14 Countries” The European Journal of Health Economics, 14- 3, pp. 527-538
  • Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. (2003) “Testingfor Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 115, pp. 53-74.
  • Johansen, S. (1988) “Statistical Analysis Of Cointegration Vectors”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,12, pp. 231-254.
  • Kangas, O. (1991) “The Bigger the Better? On the Dimensions of Welfare State Development: Social Expenditures Versus Social Rights”, Acta Sociologica, 34- 1, pp.33-44.
  • Kao, C. (1999) “Spurious Regression and Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data”, Journal of Econometrics, 90, pp.1-44.
  • Kenworthy, L. (1999) “Do Social-Welfare Policies Reduce Poverty? A Cross-National Assessment”, Social Forces, 77- 3, pp.1119-1139.
  • Korpi, W. (1985) “Economic Growth and the Welfare State: Leaky Bucket or Irrigation System?”, European Sociological Review, 1- 2, pp.97-118.
  • Levin, A., Lin, C-F., Chu, C.S.J. (2002) “Unit Root Tests In Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties”, Journal of Econometrics, 108 pp.1–24.
  • Mingione, E. (2011) “Güney Avrupa Refah Modeli ve Yoksulluk ve Sosyal Dışlanmaya Karşı Mücadele”, içinde A. Buğra ve Ç. Keyder (der.), Sosyal Politika Yazıları. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları: 261-287.
  • Maddala, G. S., Wu, S. (1999) “A Comparative Study Of Unit Root Tests With Panel Data And A New Simple Test”, Oxford Bulletin Of Economics And Statistics, Special Issue (1999) 0305-9049, pp. 631-653.
  • Mandel, H., Semyonov, M. (2006) “A Welfare State Paradox: State Interventions and Women’s Employment Opportunities in 22 Countries”, American Journal of Sociology, 111 – 6, pp.1910-1949.
  • OECD, (2014), OECD Employment Outlook 2014, OECD Publishing.
  • OECD, 10 Aralık 2016, Labour Force Statistics, (Çevrimiçi) http://stats.oecd.org.
  • OECD,10 Aralık 2016, Social Expenditure Database (SOCX), (Çevrimiçi) http://stats.oecd.org.
  • Pacek, A., Radcliff, B. (2008) “Assessing the Welfare State: The Politics of Happiness”, Perspectives on Politics, 6- 2, pp.267-277.
  • Palme, J. (2006) “Welfare States and Inequality: Institutional Designs and Distributive Outcome”, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 24, pp.87–403.
  • Pedroni, P. (2000) “Fully Modified Ols For Heterogeneous Cointegrated Panels”, Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels, 15, pp.93–130.
  • Persson, T., Tabellini, G. (1994). “Is Inequality Harmful For Growth?”, American Economic Review, 76-1, pp.191–203.
  • Ryan, P. (2003) “The State of the Welfare State”, Review of Income and Wealth, 49-1, pp.135-45.
  • Shim, J. (2015) “Social Welfare Expenditures and Infant Mortality Social Welfare Expenditures and Infant Mortality, Social Work in Public Health, 30:7, pp. 567-577.
  • Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2013) İleri Panel Veri Analizi, İstanbul: Beta Basım.
  • Taydas, Z., Peksen, D. (2012) “Can States Buy Peace? Social Welfare Spending and Civil Conflicts”, Journal of Peace Research, 49- 2, pp. 273-287.
  • Weede, E. (1991) “The Impact of State Power on Economic Growth Rates In OECD Countries”, Quality and Quantity, 25-4, pp.421–438.
  • World Bank: 10 Aralık 2016, World Data Bank World Development Indicators, (Çevrimiçi) http://databank. worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators,
  • Zwiers, M., Koster, F. (2015) “The local structure of the welfare state: Uneven effects of Social Spending on Poverty Within Countries”, Urban Studies, 52-1, pp. 87–102.
There are 38 citations in total.

Details

Subjects Political Science
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Gülden Ülgen

Leyla F. Arda Özalp

Publication Date October 27, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 5 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Ülgen, G., & Arda Özalp, L. F. (2017). Bir Refah Devleti Analizi: Ekonomik ve Sosyal Sonuçlar. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 219-243. https://doi.org/10.14782/sbd.2017.73
AMA Ülgen G, Arda Özalp LF. Bir Refah Devleti Analizi: Ekonomik ve Sosyal Sonuçlar. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi. October 2017;5(2):219-243. doi:10.14782/sbd.2017.73
Chicago Ülgen, Gülden, and Leyla F. Arda Özalp. “Bir Refah Devleti Analizi: Ekonomik Ve Sosyal Sonuçlar”. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi 5, no. 2 (October 2017): 219-43. https://doi.org/10.14782/sbd.2017.73.
EndNote Ülgen G, Arda Özalp LF (October 1, 2017) Bir Refah Devleti Analizi: Ekonomik ve Sosyal Sonuçlar. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi 5 2 219–243.
IEEE G. Ülgen and L. F. Arda Özalp, “Bir Refah Devleti Analizi: Ekonomik ve Sosyal Sonuçlar”, Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 219–243, 2017, doi: 10.14782/sbd.2017.73.
ISNAD Ülgen, Gülden - Arda Özalp, Leyla F. “Bir Refah Devleti Analizi: Ekonomik Ve Sosyal Sonuçlar”. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi 5/2 (October 2017), 219-243. https://doi.org/10.14782/sbd.2017.73.
JAMA Ülgen G, Arda Özalp LF. Bir Refah Devleti Analizi: Ekonomik ve Sosyal Sonuçlar. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi. 2017;5:219–243.
MLA Ülgen, Gülden and Leyla F. Arda Özalp. “Bir Refah Devleti Analizi: Ekonomik Ve Sosyal Sonuçlar”. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 5, no. 2, 2017, pp. 219-43, doi:10.14782/sbd.2017.73.
Vancouver Ülgen G, Arda Özalp LF. Bir Refah Devleti Analizi: Ekonomik ve Sosyal Sonuçlar. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi. 2017;5(2):219-43.

Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi’nin hakemli akademik yayınıdır. Altı ayda bir yayınlanır. Dergide yayınlanan makalelerdeki görüşler yazarlarına aittir. Yayın Kurulu tarafından benimsendiği anlamına gelmez. Yayın Kurulu, yazının özüne dokunmaksızın gerekli yazım ve cümle değişikliklerini yapma hakkını saklı tutar. Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, ulusal (TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Sosyal ve Beşerî Bilimler Veri Tabanı) ve uluslararası (EBSCO, ULRICH) alan endekslerinde taranmaktadır.  

 

Journal of Political Science is a peer-reviewed academic journal of Marmara University Faculty of Political Science. The journal is a biannual publication. All the views and opinions expressed in the articles are those of the authors and they do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editor, the editorial board, or the publisher. The editorial board reserves the right to make necessary changes in spelling and sentences without changing content. The journal is indexed by EBSCO International Index, ULRICH's and the ULAKBİM Social and Human Sciences Database.