Research Article

Why Flc-Frame is Better than Frenet Frame on Polynomial Space Curves?

Volume: 10 Number: 4 December 22, 2022
EN

Why Flc-Frame is Better than Frenet Frame on Polynomial Space Curves?

Abstract

It is well known that the binormal and normal vectors of Frenet frame rotate around the tangent vector. That is why the Frenet frame is not suitable for some applications such as tube surfaces. However, there is not enough information about why the vectors of the Frenet frame rotate around the tangent vector. In this paper we will deal with this problem. Moreover we show the advantages of Flc-frame over the Frenet frame.

Keywords

Frenet frame, space curve, adapted frame

References

  1. [1] Bishop, R. L.: There is more than one way to frame a curve. Amer. Math. Monthly 82, 246–251 (1975).
  2. [2] Bloomenthal, J.: Calculation of reference frames along a space curve. Graphics gems, Academic Press Profes- sional, Inc., San Diego, CA (1990).
  3. [3] Guggenheimer, H.: Computing frames along a trajectory. Comput. Aided Geom. Des. 6, 77–78 (1989).
  4. [4] Wang, W. Juttler, B. Zheng D. and Liu Y.: Computation of rotation minimizing frame. ACM Trans. Graph. 27(1) (2008).
  5. [5] DoCarmoM.P.:DifferentialGeometryofCurvesandSurfaces,PrenticeHall,EnglewoodCliffs,NJ(1976).
  6. [6] Mäurer, C. and Jüttler, B.: Rational approximation of rotation minimizing frames using Pythagorean-hodograph cubics. Journal for Geometry and Graphics, 3(2), 141-159 (1999).
  7. [7] Klok, F.: Two moving coordinate frames for sweeping along a 3D trajectory. Comput. Aided Geom. Des. 3, 217–229 (1986).
  8. [8] Gray, A.: Modern Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces with Mathematica, Second Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton (1998).
  9. [9] Jüttler, B. and Mäurer, C.: Cubic Pythagorean Hodograph Spline Curves and Applications to Sweep Surface Modeling. Comput. Aided Design. 31, 73-83 (1999).
  10. [10] Ravani, R. Meghdari A. and Ravani, B.: Rational Frenet-Serret curves and rotation minimizing frames in spatial motion design. IEEE international conference on Intelligent engineering systems, INES 186-192 (2004).
APA
Dede, M. (2022). Why Flc-Frame is Better than Frenet Frame on Polynomial Space Curves? Mathematical Sciences and Applications E-Notes, 10(4), 190-198. https://izlik.org/JA46MZ65EC
AMA
1.Dede M. Why Flc-Frame is Better than Frenet Frame on Polynomial Space Curves? Math. Sci. Appl. E-Notes. 2022;10(4):190-198. https://izlik.org/JA46MZ65EC
Chicago
Dede, Mustafa. 2022. “Why Flc-Frame Is Better Than Frenet Frame on Polynomial Space Curves?”. Mathematical Sciences and Applications E-Notes 10 (4): 190-98. https://izlik.org/JA46MZ65EC.
EndNote
Dede M (December 1, 2022) Why Flc-Frame is Better than Frenet Frame on Polynomial Space Curves? Mathematical Sciences and Applications E-Notes 10 4 190–198.
IEEE
[1]M. Dede, “Why Flc-Frame is Better than Frenet Frame on Polynomial Space Curves?”, Math. Sci. Appl. E-Notes, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 190–198, Dec. 2022, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA46MZ65EC
ISNAD
Dede, Mustafa. “Why Flc-Frame Is Better Than Frenet Frame on Polynomial Space Curves?”. Mathematical Sciences and Applications E-Notes 10/4 (December 1, 2022): 190-198. https://izlik.org/JA46MZ65EC.
JAMA
1.Dede M. Why Flc-Frame is Better than Frenet Frame on Polynomial Space Curves? Math. Sci. Appl. E-Notes. 2022;10:190–198.
MLA
Dede, Mustafa. “Why Flc-Frame Is Better Than Frenet Frame on Polynomial Space Curves?”. Mathematical Sciences and Applications E-Notes, vol. 10, no. 4, Dec. 2022, pp. 190-8, https://izlik.org/JA46MZ65EC.
Vancouver
1.Mustafa Dede. Why Flc-Frame is Better than Frenet Frame on Polynomial Space Curves? Math. Sci. Appl. E-Notes [Internet]. 2022 Dec. 1;10(4):190-8. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA46MZ65EC