Araştırma Makalesi

Determination of the usability of some ethnobotanically used wild plant species as forage crops

Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1 31 Mart 2022
PDF İndir
EN

Determination of the usability of some ethnobotanically used wild plant species as forage crops

Öz

Eastern Anatolia Region is located in an area where three phytogeographical regions intersect. Many of the plants known by the public and used as food in human and animal nutrition or for therapeutic purposes in traditional medicine are found in the natural flora, especially in meadows, pastures and cultivated areas. This study aimed to determine the potential of the plants found in the natural flora, which are still used for different purposes, as alternative forage crops on Kop Mountain where pasture-based stock farming is continued. The study identified 85 plant species, which are ethnobotanically used for food and medicinal purposes, from 25 families. From these genetic resources, cluster analysis was performed on 39 species from 15 families, which have alternative forage crop value. Firstly, B. corolliflora, B. lomatogona, P. cognatum, P. aviculare, P. major, Sinapis arvensis, Rapistrum rugosum, P. lanceolata, C. transsylvanica, C. syriaca, Chenopodium album, Capsella bursa pastoris, Asparagus persicus and Atriplex nitens species were found to be available as alternative forage crops. The data obtained suggests that it is possible to expand the genetic resources of forage crops with plants from different families and species and to increase the diversity of forage crops by means of such studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Acar, R., & Guncan, A. (2002). Determination of the morphological characteristics and crude protein ratios of some weed character plants that can be used as roughage. Tekirdağ. Süleyman Demirel University Agriculture Journal, 16(29), 79-83.
  2. Acar, R., M. & Mulayim. (2001). the effects of different sowing time and plant densities on some yield components and dry matter in forage beet (Beta vulgaris L. rapacea Koch.) Varieties. Turkey 4. Field Crops Congress, Tekirdağ.
  3. Acar, R. Ozkose, N., & Koç, A. (2017). Investigation of alternative use potential of cypress vinegar (Atriplex nitens Schkuhr.). Journal of Bahri Dağdaş Crop Research, 6 (2),18-22.
  4. Aksakal, O., & Kaya, Y. (2008). Plants used for food purposes by the public in Erzurum and its surroundings. 15-17 June 2008, Turkey 10. Food Congress, Erzurum.
  5. Akgoz, Y. (2013). Hazard categories and found new species of the genus Silene flora of Turkey. Journal of Trakya University, 14(81), 31-32.
  6. Bhargava, A. Shukla, S., & Ohri, D. (2003). Genetic variability and heritability of selected traits during different cuttings of vegetable Chenopodium. The Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 63(4), 359-360.
  7. Balabanli, C. Albayrak, S. Turk, M., & Yuksel, O. (2006). Some harmful effects on plants and animals found in Turkey grassland. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of the Faculty of Forestry, A(2), 89-96.
  8. Baytop, T. (1999). Past and Present Treatment Plant in Turkey. 3ed. Nobel Medical Bookstore., Istanbul, pp.357-452.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Bitki Bilimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Mart 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

15 Kasım 2021

Kabul Tarihi

22 Mart 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2022 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kadıoğlu, S., Tan, M., Kadıoğlu, B., & Karagöz Sezer, K. (2022). Determination of the usability of some ethnobotanically used wild plant species as forage crops. Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 2(1), 30-37. https://izlik.org/JA44MD45DG
AMA
1.Kadıoğlu S, Tan M, Kadıoğlu B, Karagöz Sezer K. Determination of the usability of some ethnobotanically used wild plant species as forage crops. MAÜ Tarım Doğa Derg. 2022;2(1):30-37. https://izlik.org/JA44MD45DG
Chicago
Kadıoğlu, Sibel, Mustafa Tan, Banu Kadıoğlu, ve Kevser Karagöz Sezer. 2022. “Determination of the usability of some ethnobotanically used wild plant species as forage crops”. Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi 2 (1): 30-37. https://izlik.org/JA44MD45DG.
EndNote
Kadıoğlu S, Tan M, Kadıoğlu B, Karagöz Sezer K (01 Mart 2022) Determination of the usability of some ethnobotanically used wild plant species as forage crops. Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi 2 1 30–37.
IEEE
[1]S. Kadıoğlu, M. Tan, B. Kadıoğlu, ve K. Karagöz Sezer, “Determination of the usability of some ethnobotanically used wild plant species as forage crops”, MAÜ Tarım Doğa Derg, c. 2, sy 1, ss. 30–37, Mar. 2022, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA44MD45DG
ISNAD
Kadıoğlu, Sibel - Tan, Mustafa - Kadıoğlu, Banu - Karagöz Sezer, Kevser. “Determination of the usability of some ethnobotanically used wild plant species as forage crops”. Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi 2/1 (01 Mart 2022): 30-37. https://izlik.org/JA44MD45DG.
JAMA
1.Kadıoğlu S, Tan M, Kadıoğlu B, Karagöz Sezer K. Determination of the usability of some ethnobotanically used wild plant species as forage crops. MAÜ Tarım Doğa Derg. 2022;2:30–37.
MLA
Kadıoğlu, Sibel, vd. “Determination of the usability of some ethnobotanically used wild plant species as forage crops”. Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, c. 2, sy 1, Mart 2022, ss. 30-37, https://izlik.org/JA44MD45DG.
Vancouver
1.Sibel Kadıoğlu, Mustafa Tan, Banu Kadıoğlu, Kevser Karagöz Sezer. Determination of the usability of some ethnobotanically used wild plant species as forage crops. MAÜ Tarım Doğa Derg [Internet]. 01 Mart 2022;2(1):30-7. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA44MD45DG

Flag Counter