DENETİM KOMİTESİ ÖZELLİKLERİNİN ÇEVRESEL, SOSYAL VE KURUMSAL YÖNETİŞİM PERFORMANSINA ETKİSİ

Abstract

Araştırmanın amacı, BİST-100 endeksindeki işletmelerin denetim komitesi özelliklerinin çevresel, sosyal ve kurumsal yönetişim skoru üzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktır. Araştırmada denetim komitesi büyüklüğü, bağımsızlık skoru, yönetici olmayan üye skoru, uzmanlık skoru, görev süresi skoru gibi özelliklerin çevresel, sosyal ve kurumsal yönetişim skorunu nasıl etkilediği incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın örneklemi BİST-100 endeksinde yer alan işletmelerden oluşmaktadır. 2019-2023 yılına ait veriler regresyon yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Kontrol değişkenleri olarak işletme büyüklüğü, aktif kârlılık oranı ve kaldıraç oranı kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre işletmelerin denetim komitesi bağımsızlık skoru ve denetim komitesi görev süresinin işletmelerin çevresel, sosyal ve kurumsal yönetişim skorları üzerinde olumlu etkiye sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

• ÇSY
• ÇSY Skoru
• ÇSY Açıklamaları
• Denetim Komitesi
• Denetim Komitesi Özellikleri

THE EFFECT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARACTERISTICS ON ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (ESG) SCORES: AN APPLICATION TO BIST 100 ENTERPRISES

Abstract

The aim of this research is to investigate the impact of audit committee characteristics on ESG scores of enterprises in the BIST-100 index. The research examines how features such as audit committee size, independence score, non-executive member score, expertise score, and tenure score affect the environmental, social and corporate governance score. Data for the years 2019-2023 were analyzed by regression method. Company size, return on assets and leverage ratios are used as control variables. The results show that audit committee independence score and audit committee tenure have a positive impact on the environmental, social and corporate governance scores of companies.

Keywords

• ESG
• ESG Score
• ESG Disclosures
• Audit Committees
• Audit Committee Characteristics

References

1. Adegboye, A., Ojeka, S., Alabi, O., Alo, U., Aına, A. (2020). Audit Committee Characteristics and Sustainability Performance in Nigerian Listed Banks. Business: Theory and Practice, ISSN 1648- 0627 / eISSN 1822-4202, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp. 469–476, https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2020.10463
2. Agnese, P., Arduino, F. R., Cerciello, M., Taddeo, S. (2023). Does board knowledge matter for ESG performance in the European banking industry? Corporate Social Responsibility Environment Management, pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2811
3. Albitar, K., Hussainey, K., Kolade, N., & Gerged, A. (2020). ESG disclosure and firm performance before and after IR: The moderating role of governance mechanisms. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 28(3), 429–444.
4. Almeida, MG. D., Paiva, I. C. D. S. (2022). Audit Committees and its Effect on Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure. 17th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). ISBN: 978-989-33-3436-2
5. Alodat, A. Y., Salleh, Z., Hashim, H. A., & Sulong, F. (2022). Corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Jordan. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 20(5), 866–896.
6. Alodat, A. Y., Nobanee, H., Salleh, Z. Hashim, H. Z. (2023). The Impact of Longer Audit Committee Chair Tenure and Board Tenure on The Level of Sustainability Disclosure: The Moderating Role of Firm Size. Business Strat Dev., Volume 6, pp. 885–896. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.285
7. Appuhami, R., Tashakor, S. (2017). The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on CSR Disclosure: an Analysis of Australian Firms. Aust. Account. Rev., Volume 27 (4), pp. 400–420.
8. Arif, M., Sajjad, A., Farooq, S., Abrar, M. and Joyo, A.S. (2020). The Impact of Audit Committee Attributes on The Quality and Quantity of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosures. Corporate Governance, Volume 21, No. 3, pp. 497-514. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG- 06-2020-0243

9. Arifin, W. N. (2015). The Graphical Assessment of Multivariate Normality Using SPSS. Education in Medicine Journal, 7(2), 71-75.
10. Astuti, S. (2024). Politically Connected Audit Committees and ESG Reporting. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, Volume 28, 1
11. Bamahros, H. M., Alquhaif, A., Qasem, A., Wan-Hussin, W. N., Thomran, M., Al-Duais, S. D., Shukeri, S. N., Khojally, H. M. A. (2022). Corporate Governance Mechanisms and ESG Reporting: Evidence From the Saudi Stock Market. Sustainability, Volume 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su14106202
12. Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T. W., Wang, X. (2021). The Role of ESG Performance During Times of Financial Crisis: Evidence From COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, Volume 38
13. Buallay, A. and Al-Ajmi, J. (2018). The Role of Audit Committee Attributes In Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Evidence From Banks In The Gulf Cooperation Council. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Volume 21, No. 2, pp. 249-264. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-06-2018-0085
14. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2021). Sosyal Bilimler için Çok Değişkenli İstatistik: SPSS ve Lisrel Uygulamaları. Pegem Akademi, Ankara
15. Hapsari, H. D., Arieftiara, D. (2024). The Effect of Audit Committee Size, Board Size, and Women on the Board on the Disclosure of Environment, Social, and Good Governance (ESG) Reports Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesian Mining Companies. 3rd JESICA The 3rd Jakarta Economic Sustainability International Conference, Volume 2024
16. Hasnan, S., Adil, M. Z. Z., Adil, Z., Farmy, M. H. D. M., Anuar, M. I., Nazri, M. Z. M., Shaifuddin, A. R. M. (2023). Factors Affecting Corporate Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Reporting: A Literature Review. Accounting and Finance Research, Volume 12, No 4
17. Ioannou, I., and Serafeim, G. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts' perceptions and shifting institutional logics. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 36(7), pp.1053–1081.
18. Kusharyanti, S., Marita, A. (2024). Politically Connected Audit Committees and ESG Reporting. Journal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia 28(1)
19. Li, J., Mangena, M., Pike, R. (2012). The Effect of Audit Committee Characteristics on Intellectual Capital Disclosure. Br. Account. Rev, Volume 44 (2), pp.98–110
20. Linh, L. T. H., Phuong Thao, D. T. (2024). Audit Committee Features and ESG Disclosure: Evidence from Vietnam Listed Companies. AISC Proceedings, Volume 3
21. Matta, R., Trivedi, D., Shalini, P., Mıshra, A. (2024). Role of Audıt Commıttee in ESG Reporting Quality: Evıdence From Indıa. Accountancy Business and the Public Interest, ISSN: 1745-7718
22. Narullia, D., Putri, D. M., Setiaji, Y. T., Fadhilah, N. (2024). Connection Between the Audit Characteristics and Corporate ESG Performance in Indonesia. Volume 07, Issue 01, Page No: 1-5. DOI: 10.47191/jefms/v7-i1-01. ISSN (print): 2644-0490. ISSN (online): 2644-0504
23. Othman, R., Ishak, I.F., Arif, S.M.M., Aris, N.A. (2014). Influence of Audit Committee Characteristics on Voluntary Ethics Disclosure. Proc.-Soc. Behav. Sci., Volume 145, pp. 330–342.
24. Paolone, F., Pozzoli, M., Cucari, N., Bianco, R., (2022). Longer Board Tenure and Audit Committee Tenure. How Do They Impact Environmental Performance? A European Study. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag, Volume 30, pp. 358–368
25. Pasko, O., Zhang, L., Proskurina, N., Ryzhikova, N., Mykhailova, Y. (2024). Does Internal Audit Matter? Audit Committee, Its Attributes, and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Quality. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, Volume 21, Issue 2
26. Pernamasari, R., Chariri, A. (2024). Characteristics of the Audit Committee and the Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) Performance in Indonesian Companies. In The 3rd International Conference on Business, Economics, and Sustainability Science, KnE Social Sciences, pp. 286–302. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i21.16716
27. Pozzoli, M. Pagani, A., Paolone, F. (2022). The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on ESG Performance in The European Union Member States: Empirical Evidence Before and During The COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Cleaner Production, 371
28. Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., Trojanowski, G. (2015). Board Attributes, Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy, And Corporate Environmental And Social Performance. J. Bus. Ethics, Volume 135 (3), pp.569–585
29. Umar, H. U., Firmansyah, E. A., Danlami, M. R., Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2023). Revisiting The Relationship Between Corporate Governance Mechanisms And ESG Disclosures in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Volume 20 No. 4, pp. 724-747
30. Zahid, R. M. A., Saleem, A., Maqsood, U. S. (2022a). ESG Performance, Capital Financing Decisions, and Audit Quality: Empirical Evidence From Chinese State-Owned Enterprises. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Volume 30, pp. 44086–44099
31. Zahid, R. M. A., Taran, A., Khan, M. K., Chersan, I-C. (2022b). ESG, Dividend Payout Policy and The Moderating Role of Audit Quality: Empirical Evidence From Western Europe. Borsa Istanbul Review, Volume 23-2, pp. 350–367
32. Zahid, R.M. A., Khan, M. K., Anwar, W., Maqsood, U. S. (2022c). The Role of Audit Quality in The ESG-Corporate Financial Performance Nexus: Empirical Evidence From Western European Companies. Borsa _Istanbul Review, Volume 22-S2, S200–S212
33. Zaman, R., Farooq, M. B., Khalid, F., Mahmood, Z. (2020). Examining The Extent of and Determinants for Sustainability Assurance Quality: The Role Of Audit Committees. Bus Strat Env. Volume 30, pp. 2887–2906.