Conference Paper
BibTex RIS Cite

IPSAS VS. NATIONAL GAAP : DIFFERENCES AND CHALLENGES IN IMPLEMENTING IPSAS IN ALBANIAN PUBLIC SECTOR

Year 2018, Volume: 20 Issue: 3, 507 - 530, 27.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.370019

Abstract



ABSTRACT



The aim of this paper is to
analyze the differences between International Public Sector Accounting
Standards (IPSAS) and the Albanian Public Sector GAAP (Albanian PS GAAP). At
the same time, the paper tries to emphasize the steps and the challenges of implementing
IPSAS in Albanian context.

The analyses are based on
official information from strategic documents of the Government of Albania, as
well as official reports form the international professional and financial
institutions, such as: World Bank, IFAC, and OECD.




References

  • • Institute of Statistics, INSTAT, (2016)
  • • International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (n.d.), Retrieved from International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), https://www.ipsasb.org/.
  • • International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board, (2016), Handbook of International Public Sector Accounting Pronouncements, IFAC.
  • • Jones, R. (2007), The functions of governmental accounting in Europe, Revista de Estudos Politecnicos, 89-110.
  • • Jovanovic, T. (2013), Public Sector Accounting Reform. NISPAcee, The Network of Institutes and Schools of Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe.
  • • Ministry of Education, Sport and Youth, (2016).
  • • Ministry of Finance and Economy, (2014), Public Finance Management Strategy (2014-2020). Tirana,http://www.financa.gov.al/al/raportime/strategjia-per-menaxhimin-e-financave-publike-2014-2020.
  • • OECD, (2009). Accrual Accounting and Budgeting: Key Issues and Recent Developments. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 43-59.
  • • World Bank Open Data. (n.d.), Retrieved from World Bank: https://data.worldbank.org/.

IPSAS VS. NATIONAL GAAP: DIFFERENCES AND CHALLENGES IN IMPLEMENTING IPSAS IN ALBANIAN PUBLIC SECTOR

Year 2018, Volume: 20 Issue: 3, 507 - 530, 27.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.370019

Abstract



ÖZ



Bu makalenin amacı, Uluslararası Kamu Sektörü Muhasebe Standartları (IPSAS)
ile Arnavut Kamu Sektörü GAAP (Arnavutluk PS GAAP) arasındaki farkları analiz
etmektir. Aynı zamanda, bu makale Arnavutluk şartlarında, IPSAS uygulamasının adımlarını
ve zorluklarını vurgulamaya çalışıyor.



Analizler, Arnavutluk Hükümeti'nin stratejik belgelerinin resmi
bilgilerine, hem de Dünya Bankası, IFAC ve OECD gibi uluslararası mesleki ve
mali kurumların resmi raporlarına dayanıyor.




References

  • • Institute of Statistics, INSTAT, (2016)
  • • International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (n.d.), Retrieved from International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), https://www.ipsasb.org/.
  • • International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board, (2016), Handbook of International Public Sector Accounting Pronouncements, IFAC.
  • • Jones, R. (2007), The functions of governmental accounting in Europe, Revista de Estudos Politecnicos, 89-110.
  • • Jovanovic, T. (2013), Public Sector Accounting Reform. NISPAcee, The Network of Institutes and Schools of Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe.
  • • Ministry of Education, Sport and Youth, (2016).
  • • Ministry of Finance and Economy, (2014), Public Finance Management Strategy (2014-2020). Tirana,http://www.financa.gov.al/al/raportime/strategjia-per-menaxhimin-e-financave-publike-2014-2020.
  • • OECD, (2009). Accrual Accounting and Budgeting: Key Issues and Recent Developments. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 43-59.
  • • World Bank Open Data. (n.d.), Retrieved from World Bank: https://data.worldbank.org/.
There are 9 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section Conference Paper
Authors

Dritan Fıno 0000-0003-1214-2412

Kesjana Halılı This is me 0000-0001-9559-4750

Erisa Rodhanı This is me 0000-0001-5067-8045

Submission Date December 22, 2017
Publication Date September 27, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 20 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Fıno, D., Halılı, K., & Rodhanı, E. (2018). IPSAS VS. NATIONAL GAAP : DIFFERENCES AND CHALLENGES IN IMPLEMENTING IPSAS IN ALBANIAN PUBLIC SECTOR. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 20(3), 507-530. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.370019

Authorship
MBDD follows the guidelines in COPE Authorship Guideline to ensure fair recognition of contributions to a research paper (https://publicationethics.org/guidance/discussion-document/authorship ). Authorship carries both credit and responsibility, and it is essential that all listed authors have made significant contributions to the research.

For multi-author studies, the Contributions of Authors must be declared after the conclusion and before the bibliography of the paper. The authors' initials and last names should be used to indicate which author contributed to which part of the manuscript. Details can be found by clicking the “Article Submission Checklist” button. The authors can acknowledge contributions that do not merit authorship.


The author(s) should disclose the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted tools in design and implementation of the research. Such use need to be disclosed within the methodology section of the manuscript. Use of AI does not preclude the manuscript from publication, rather provides a transparent picture of the research.