The purpose of this study is to state that if accountants’ emotional intelligence (EI) levels range in accordiance with their professional titles, tenure and education levels. Emotional intelligence has been examined by using Bar-On’s five–component model. Analysis results of the data from a sample consisting of randomly selected accountants (Trainers, CA and CPA) who work dependent to accounting firms (CA and CPA firms) from various regions in Turkey (n=470) show that a) there is not any statistically significant difference between accountants EI and their professional titles, b) there is statistically significant difference between accountants EI and their tenur and c) there is only statistically significant difference between accountants general mood and education level.
Bu çalışmanın amacı, muhasebe meslek mensuplarının duygusal zekâ düzeylerinin mesleki ünvanları, deneyim süreleri ve eğitim seviyelerine göre farklılık gösterip göstermediğini ortaya koymaktır. Duygusal zekâ Bar-On (1997) tarafından geliştirilen ve beş alt boyuttan oluşan model ile incelenmiştir. Türkiye’nin çeşitli illerindeki muhasebe bürolarında bağımlı olarak çalışan toplam 470 muhasebe meslek mensubunun katılımıyla oluşan örneklemden toplanan veriler kullanılarak yapılan analizlerin sonucunda, a) farklı unvanlara sahip muhasebe meslek mensuplarının duygusal zekâ düzeyleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar bulunmamıştır; b) farklı deneyim süresine sahip muhasebe meslek mensuplarının duygusal zekâ düzeyleri arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılaşma görülürken c) farklı eğitim seviyelerine sahip muhasebe meslek mensupları arasında ise duygusal zekânın sadece genel ruh hali boyutunda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık görülmüştür.
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Business Administration |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Submission Date | November 2, 2016 |
| Publication Date | December 29, 2016 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2016 Volume: 18 Issue: 4 |
Authorship
MBDD follows the guidelines in COPE Authorship Guideline to ensure fair recognition of contributions to a research paper (https://publicationethics.org/guidance/discussion-document/authorship ). Authorship carries both credit and responsibility, and it is essential that all listed authors have made significant contributions to the research.
For multi-author studies, the Contributions of Authors must be declared after the conclusion and before the bibliography of the paper. The authors' initials and last names should be used to indicate which author contributed to which part of the manuscript. Details can be found by clicking the “Article Submission Checklist” button. The authors can acknowledge contributions that do not merit authorship.
The author(s) should disclose the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted tools in design and implementation of the research. Such use need to be disclosed within the methodology section of the manuscript. Use of AI does not preclude the manuscript from publication, rather provides a transparent picture of the research.