Research Article

CAN TYPES OF WRONGDOINGS AND THE CORRUPTION PERCEPTION SCORES BE CRITERIA TO DEFINE AUDIT THRESHOLDS FOR NON-LISTED COMPANIES? THE CASES OF TURKEY, JAPAN AND ALBANIA

Volume: 18 Number: 1 March 31, 2016
  • Mehmet Özbirecikli
  • Joshiaki Jınnaı
  • Nertila Cıka
EN TR

CAN TYPES OF WRONGDOINGS AND THE CORRUPTION PERCEPTION SCORES BE CRITERIA TO DEFINE AUDIT THRESHOLDS FOR NON-LISTED COMPANIES? THE CASES OF TURKEY, JAPAN AND ALBANIA

Abstract

This study struggles to analyze if types of wrongdoings encountered in, and the corruption perception scores (CPS) of a country can be criteria to define the thresholds specifying size of non-listed companies (NLC) subject to independent audit in order to find out to what extent independent audit of NLC should be expanded in three countries, which are quite different from each other socially and economically: Japan, Turkey and Albania. The findings indicate that the types and intensity of wrongdoings differ from one country to another in some aspects; anyway wrongdoings are encountered in these three countries more or less. Thus, we conclude that the types and intensity of the wrongdoings and CPS should not be criteria to be considered when defining the said thresholds.

Keywords

References

  1. A.F. Dalkılıç, C. İbiş, N. Hikmet 2012. “Preparation of Non-listed Companies for External Auditing: Policy Recommendations for Turkish SMEs towards New Turkish Commercial Code”, International Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 2(1).
  2. Code de Commere 1807. Edition Textuelle, Novembre, Gene.
  3. Dhamo and Shkurti 2011. Audit Profession in the Balkans, Albania, Croatia, Macedonya, Romania, Serbia, Turkey, TURMOB Yayınları 416.
  4. Güvemli, O. 2000. “Türk Devletleri Muhasebe Tarihi, Tanzimat’tan Cumhuriyet’e”, Cilt:3, İstanbul.
  5. Güvemli, O. 2001. Türk Ticaret Kanunu, Cumhuriyet Dönemi, XX. Yüzyıl, Cilt:4, İstanbul.
  6. Hasegawa, T. 2000. “Investigation of Corruption in Japan”, Resource Material Series No. 56, 113th, 469-475, International Training Course held by Asia and Far East Institute for the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders (UNAFEI), Tokyo, Japan.
  7. http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2012/in_detail/ (Access Date: 16.10.2012).
  8. http://www.transparency.org/cpi2013/results (Access Date: 09.06.2014).

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Business Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Mehmet Özbirecikli This is me
Türkiye

Joshiaki Jınnaı This is me
Japan

Nertila Cıka This is me
Albania

Publication Date

March 31, 2016

Submission Date

January 21, 2016

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2016 Volume: 18 Number: 1

APA
Özbirecikli, M., Jınnaı, J., & Cıka, N. (2016). CAN TYPES OF WRONGDOINGS AND THE CORRUPTION PERCEPTION SCORES BE CRITERIA TO DEFINE AUDIT THRESHOLDS FOR NON-LISTED COMPANIES? THE CASES OF TURKEY, JAPAN AND ALBANIA. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 18(1), 99-126. https://izlik.org/JA99PX37RH
AMA
1.Özbirecikli M, Jınnaı J, Cıka N. CAN TYPES OF WRONGDOINGS AND THE CORRUPTION PERCEPTION SCORES BE CRITERIA TO DEFINE AUDIT THRESHOLDS FOR NON-LISTED COMPANIES? THE CASES OF TURKEY, JAPAN AND ALBANIA. MODAV-MBDD. 2016;18(1):99-126. https://izlik.org/JA99PX37RH
Chicago
Özbirecikli, Mehmet, Joshiaki Jınnaı, and Nertila Cıka. 2016. “CAN TYPES OF WRONGDOINGS AND THE CORRUPTION PERCEPTION SCORES BE CRITERIA TO DEFINE AUDIT THRESHOLDS FOR NON-LISTED COMPANIES? THE CASES OF TURKEY, JAPAN AND ALBANIA”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 18 (1): 99-126. https://izlik.org/JA99PX37RH.
EndNote
Özbirecikli M, Jınnaı J, Cıka N (March 1, 2016) CAN TYPES OF WRONGDOINGS AND THE CORRUPTION PERCEPTION SCORES BE CRITERIA TO DEFINE AUDIT THRESHOLDS FOR NON-LISTED COMPANIES? THE CASES OF TURKEY, JAPAN AND ALBANIA. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 18 1 99–126.
IEEE
[1]M. Özbirecikli, J. Jınnaı, and N. Cıka, “CAN TYPES OF WRONGDOINGS AND THE CORRUPTION PERCEPTION SCORES BE CRITERIA TO DEFINE AUDIT THRESHOLDS FOR NON-LISTED COMPANIES? THE CASES OF TURKEY, JAPAN AND ALBANIA”, MODAV-MBDD, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 99–126, Mar. 2016, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA99PX37RH
ISNAD
Özbirecikli, Mehmet - Jınnaı, Joshiaki - Cıka, Nertila. “CAN TYPES OF WRONGDOINGS AND THE CORRUPTION PERCEPTION SCORES BE CRITERIA TO DEFINE AUDIT THRESHOLDS FOR NON-LISTED COMPANIES? THE CASES OF TURKEY, JAPAN AND ALBANIA”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 18/1 (March 1, 2016): 99-126. https://izlik.org/JA99PX37RH.
JAMA
1.Özbirecikli M, Jınnaı J, Cıka N. CAN TYPES OF WRONGDOINGS AND THE CORRUPTION PERCEPTION SCORES BE CRITERIA TO DEFINE AUDIT THRESHOLDS FOR NON-LISTED COMPANIES? THE CASES OF TURKEY, JAPAN AND ALBANIA. MODAV-MBDD. 2016;18:99–126.
MLA
Özbirecikli, Mehmet, et al. “CAN TYPES OF WRONGDOINGS AND THE CORRUPTION PERCEPTION SCORES BE CRITERIA TO DEFINE AUDIT THRESHOLDS FOR NON-LISTED COMPANIES? THE CASES OF TURKEY, JAPAN AND ALBANIA”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, vol. 18, no. 1, Mar. 2016, pp. 99-126, https://izlik.org/JA99PX37RH.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Özbirecikli, Joshiaki Jınnaı, Nertila Cıka. CAN TYPES OF WRONGDOINGS AND THE CORRUPTION PERCEPTION SCORES BE CRITERIA TO DEFINE AUDIT THRESHOLDS FOR NON-LISTED COMPANIES? THE CASES OF TURKEY, JAPAN AND ALBANIA. MODAV-MBDD [Internet]. 2016 Mar. 1;18(1):99-126. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA99PX37RH

Authorship 
MBDD follows the guidelines in COPE Authorship Guideline to ensure fair recognition of contributions to a research paper (https://publicationethics.org/guidance/discussion-document/authorship). Authorship carries both credit and responsibility, and it is essential that all listed authors have made significant contributions to the research. 

For multi-author studies, the Contributions of Authors must be declared after the conclusion and before the bibliography of the paper. The authors' initials and last names should be used to indicate which author contributed to which part of the manuscript. Details can be found by clicking the “Article Submission Checklist” button. The authors can acknowledge contributions that do not merit authorship.


The author(s) should disclose the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted tools in design and implementation of the research. Such use need to be disclosed within the methodology section of the manuscript. Use of AI does not preclude the manuscript from publication, rather provides a transparent picture of the research.