Research Article

TRADE RECEIVABLES COLLECTION PERIOD AND FIRM VALUE: EVIDENCE FROM LISTED TURKISH INDUSTRIALS

Volume: 24 Number: 1 March 31, 2022
TR EN

TRADE RECEIVABLES COLLECTION PERIOD AND FIRM VALUE: EVIDENCE FROM LISTED TURKISH INDUSTRIALS

Abstract

This paper shows that average collection period of trade receivables (ACP) and a deterioration in the credit quality of trade receivables both have negative effect on firm value. Evidence is based on Turkish industrial firms listed on Borsa Istanbul over 2005-2017 period. The effect exists only for firms whose average collection period increased by more than thirty days within the last one to three years. Similarly, the value consequence of ACP holds for high-profit firms, but not for low-profit firms. This study utilizes system generalized method of moments in all estimations and treats trade receivable policy variables as endogenous due to omitted variable bias concerns. Overall, findings suggest a destructive effect of lengthened deferred payment terms on firm value specifically for high-profit firms and for firms with a historical upward trend in ACP.

Keywords

References

  1. Adiguzel, G. (2021). Credit quality of trade receivables and its impact on cash holdings and firm value. International Journal of Business Administration, 12(2), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijba.v12n2p88
  2. Aktas, N., Croci, E., & Petmezas, D. (2015). Is working capital management value-enhancing? Evidence from firm performance and investments. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30, 98-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.12.008
  3. Atanasova, C. (2012). How do firms choose between intermediary and supplier finance? Financial Management, 41(1), 207-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2012.01183.x
  4. Barrot, J. N. (2016). Trade credit and industry dynamics: Evidence from trucking firms. The Journal of Finance, 71(5), 1975-2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12371
  5. Berger, P.G., & Ofek, E. (1995). Diversification's effect on firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 37(1), 39-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(94)00798-6
  6. Blazenko, G., & Vandezande, K. (2003). The product differentiation hypothesis for corporate trade credit. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(6-7), 457-469. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1113
  7. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
  8. Boisjoly, R.P., Conine Jr. T.E., & McDonald IV, M.B. (2020). Working capital management: Financial and valuation impacts. Journal of Business Research, 108, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.025

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Business Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 31, 2022

Submission Date

March 26, 2021

Acceptance Date

August 23, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 24 Number: 1

APA
Adıgüzel, G. (2022). TRADE RECEIVABLES COLLECTION PERIOD AND FIRM VALUE: EVIDENCE FROM LISTED TURKISH INDUSTRIALS. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 24(1), 132-152. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.904086
AMA
1.Adıgüzel G. TRADE RECEIVABLES COLLECTION PERIOD AND FIRM VALUE: EVIDENCE FROM LISTED TURKISH INDUSTRIALS. MODAV-MBDD. 2022;24(1):132-152. doi:10.31460/mbdd.904086
Chicago
Adıgüzel, Güldehen. 2022. “TRADE RECEIVABLES COLLECTION PERIOD AND FIRM VALUE: EVIDENCE FROM LISTED TURKISH INDUSTRIALS”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 24 (1): 132-52. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.904086.
EndNote
Adıgüzel G (March 1, 2022) TRADE RECEIVABLES COLLECTION PERIOD AND FIRM VALUE: EVIDENCE FROM LISTED TURKISH INDUSTRIALS. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 24 1 132–152.
IEEE
[1]G. Adıgüzel, “TRADE RECEIVABLES COLLECTION PERIOD AND FIRM VALUE: EVIDENCE FROM LISTED TURKISH INDUSTRIALS”, MODAV-MBDD, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 132–152, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.31460/mbdd.904086.
ISNAD
Adıgüzel, Güldehen. “TRADE RECEIVABLES COLLECTION PERIOD AND FIRM VALUE: EVIDENCE FROM LISTED TURKISH INDUSTRIALS”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi 24/1 (March 1, 2022): 132-152. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.904086.
JAMA
1.Adıgüzel G. TRADE RECEIVABLES COLLECTION PERIOD AND FIRM VALUE: EVIDENCE FROM LISTED TURKISH INDUSTRIALS. MODAV-MBDD. 2022;24:132–152.
MLA
Adıgüzel, Güldehen. “TRADE RECEIVABLES COLLECTION PERIOD AND FIRM VALUE: EVIDENCE FROM LISTED TURKISH INDUSTRIALS”. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, vol. 24, no. 1, Mar. 2022, pp. 132-5, doi:10.31460/mbdd.904086.
Vancouver
1.Güldehen Adıgüzel. TRADE RECEIVABLES COLLECTION PERIOD AND FIRM VALUE: EVIDENCE FROM LISTED TURKISH INDUSTRIALS. MODAV-MBDD. 2022 Mar. 1;24(1):132-5. doi:10.31460/mbdd.904086

Authorship 
MBDD follows the guidelines in COPE Authorship Guideline to ensure fair recognition of contributions to a research paper (https://publicationethics.org/guidance/discussion-document/authorship). Authorship carries both credit and responsibility, and it is essential that all listed authors have made significant contributions to the research. 

For multi-author studies, the Contributions of Authors must be declared after the conclusion and before the bibliography of the paper. The authors' initials and last names should be used to indicate which author contributed to which part of the manuscript. Details can be found by clicking the “Article Submission Checklist” button. The authors can acknowledge contributions that do not merit authorship.


The author(s) should disclose the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted tools in design and implementation of the research. Such use need to be disclosed within the methodology section of the manuscript. Use of AI does not preclude the manuscript from publication, rather provides a transparent picture of the research.