Bu çalışma, özel olarak uyarlanmış bir risk değerlendirme modeline sahip olmamanın, karbon muhasebesinin ulusal politika çerçevelerine etkili bir şekilde entegrasyonunu sınırladığını ve bu durumun, evrilen küresel karbon piyasalarında ilerlemekteki yeteneğini engellediğini varsaymaktadır. Bu çalışma, risk değerlendirme ilkelerini karbon muhasebesi stratejileriyle entegre ederek, Türk politika yapıcılarının karbon ekonomisi stratejileri, karbon stoğu yönetimi ve uluslararası düzenleyici uyumluluk ile ilişkili riskleri tanımlamalarına ve hafifletmelerine yardımcı olacak yenilikçi bir çerçeve önermektedir. Araştırma, küresel karbon piyasası eğilimleri, karbon vergisi uygulamaları ve Türkiye'nin karbon muhasebesi stratejilerine dair analitik bir inceleme sunmakta ve bunun sonunda orijinal bir risk modeli geliştirmektedir.
This study hypothesizes that the absence of a tailored risk assessment model constrains the effective integration of carbon accounting into national policy frameworks, thereby hindering the country's capacity to advance within the global carbon markets. By integrating risk assessment principles with carbon accounting strategies, the study proposes an innovative framework designed to support Turkish policymakers in identifying and mitigating risks associated with carbon economy strategies, carbon stock management, and international regulatory compliance. The research offers an analytical examination of carbon market trends, carbon taxation practices, and Turkey’s carbon accounting strategies, culminating in the development of an original risk assessment model.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Environment and Climate Finance, Financial Forecast and Modelling, Financial Markets and Institutions, Sustainability Accounting and Reporting |
Journal Section | MAIN SECTION |
Authors | |
Early Pub Date | September 28, 2025 |
Publication Date | September 30, 2025 |
Submission Date | November 19, 2024 |
Acceptance Date | May 20, 2025 |
Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 27 Issue: 3 |
Authorship
MBDD follows the guidelines in COPE Authorship Guideline to ensure fair recognition of contributions to a research paper (https://publicationethics.org/guidance/discussion-document/authorship ). Authorship carries both credit and responsibility, and it is essential that all listed authors have made significant contributions to the research.
For multi-author studies, the Contributions of Authors must be declared after the conclusion and before the bibliography of the paper. The authors' initials and last names should be used to indicate which author contributed to which part of the manuscript. Details can be found by clicking the “Article Submission Checklist” button. The authors can acknowledge contributions that do not merit authorship.
The author(s) should disclose the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted tools in design and implementation of the research. Such use need to be disclosed within the methodology section of the manuscript. Use of AI does not preclude the manuscript from publication, rather provides a transparent picture of the research.