Interactions Between Economy and Fish Welfare in Aquaponics Systems
Abstract
Fish are considered to be sentient and capable of perceiving and experiencing pain. Fish welfare in farming conditions can be interpreted with regard to ethics, economic viability, legal issues and consumer’s perspectives. Fish welfare is directly related with the economic inputs such as stocking density, mortality and growth rate, affecting the profitability of the aquaponics systems therefore, fish welfare has a strong economical dimension in an overall sustainability of aquaponics systems. Thus, there is a growing understanding of a link between fish welfare and feasibility of the fish production systems. The economic achievement of aquaponics production may be linked to fish welfare, particularly with regard to preclude the fish diseases. Sustainable and profitable production of aquaponics can be challenged by poor welfare of fish. The poor welfare might lead to higher yield variation, resulting in poor economic gain. The strategies that can be adopted to protect fish welfare can increase profits and productivity of the aquaponics systems. Fish welfare practices should be considered to improve the production performance in aquaponics.
Keywords
References
- Alfnes, F., Chen, X., Rickertsen, K. (2017) Labeling farmed seafood:A review. Aquaculture Economics and Management 22(1): 1-26 DOI: 10.1080/13657305.2017.1356398
- Anonymous (1979) Opinion on the Welfare of the Farmed Fish. Farm Animal Welfare Committee. February 2014. Available online: www.defra.gov.uk/fawc
- Anonymous (2017) Welfare of farmed fish: Common practices during transport and at slaughter. SANTE/2016/G2/009, September 2017 doi: 10.2875/172078
- Costas, B., Araga, C., Mancera, J.M., Dinis, M.T., Conceica, L.E.C. (2008) High stocking density induces crowding stress and affects amino acid metabolism in Senegalese sole Solea senegalensis (Kaup 1858) juveniles. Aquaculture Research 39: 1–9
- Dykes, A. (2012) Cost and Benefits of Fish Welfare – A Producer’s Perspective. Aquacult Econ & Manag 16 (4): 429-432 DOI: 10.1080/13657305.2012.729246
- d’Orbcastel, E.R., Blancheton, J.P., Belaud, A. (2009) Water quality and rainbow trout performance in a Danish Model Farm recirculating system: Comparison with a flow through system. Aquacultural Engineering 40: 135–143
- EFSA (2004) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) on a request from the Commission related to the welfare of animals during transport. Question N° EFSA-Q-2003-094. The EFSA Journal 44: 181Ellis, T., North, B., Scott, A.P., Bromage, N.R., Porter, M., Gadd, D. (2002) The relationships between stocking density and welfare in farmed rainbow trout. J Fish Biology 61: 493-531
- Ellis, T., Yildiz, H.Y., López-Olmeda, J., Spedicato, M.T., Tort, L., Øverli, Ø., Martins, C. (2012a) Cortisol and fish welfare. Fish Physiology Biochemistry 38:163–188
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Hydrobiology
Journal Section
Review
Publication Date
January 30, 2019
Submission Date
October 18, 2018
Acceptance Date
December 25, 2018
Published in Issue
Year 2019 Volume: 2 Number: 1