Comparison of spinach cultivation in floating hydroponic system and soil in glasshouse and open field conditions

Year 2022, , 7 - 14, 01.04.2022

Kutluk Bilge Bostancı Salih Ülger

https://doi.org/10.29136/mediterranean.1061475

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of glasshouse and outdoor conditions on the growth of spinach plants in floating hydroponic culture and soil. In the floating hydroponic culture, the plants were grown in a plastic tank (120x50x30 cm) and a volume of 80 L in a glasshouse and open field. Each seed was inserted at 13x5 cm in rock wool in styrofoam and then placed in the nutrient solution. There was no significant change in EC values measured in the glasshouse and outside, and the pH of the solutions in the outdoor environment was higher (except in late December) than those in the glasshouse. The earliest and late harvests were made in floating hydroponic culture in the glasshouse and outdoor cultivation at 64 and 97 days, respectively. The highest yield was 1.54 kg m-2 in open field cultivation, it was followed by 1.45 kg m-2 in the greenhouse and 1.32 kg m-2 in the open field in floating hydroponic culture, respectively. Despite the high yield that can be obtained from floating hydroponic culture cultivation in the glasshouse and outside, the fact that there is a lower marketable amount is a negative aspect. However, the floating hydroponic culture could be preferred to soil cultivation due to many advantages such as production 2-3 times a year, low labor costs, and less pesticide use. Spinach cultivation in the open field does not have any problems in terms of nitrate, but nitrate accumulation can be a problem in hydroponic culture.

Keywords

Floating hydroponic culture, Soil growing, Nitrate, Spinacia oleracea

Supporting Institution

The Scientific Projects Unit of Akdeniz University

Project Number

FYL-2015-412, 2015-2016

Thanks

This work was part of the Master Science experiment and financially supported by the Scientific Projects Unit of Akdeniz University with the project no FYL-2015-412, 2015-2016. The authors thank Prof.Dr. Nurgul Ercan, the previous supervisor of the project, for her assistance.

References

• Anonymous (2011) Ispanak Yetiştiriciliği ve Hastalıkları. http://tabider.org 2011. Accesed 21 October, 2016.
• Anonymous (2019) TRGM-nitrat bilgi sistemi Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı. http://www.tarimorman.gov.tr. Accessed 28 October, 2020.
• Ayaz A, Yurttagül M (2006) Sebzelerin nitrat ve nitrit içeriklerine etki eden faktörler. Beslenme ve Diyet Dergisi 34(2): 51-64.
• Bergmann W (1992) Nutritional Disorders of Plants. Gustav Fischer Verlag Jena, New York, pp. 1-741.
• Brandenberger L, Cavins T, Payton M, Wells L, Johnson T (2007) Yield and quality of spinach cultivars for greenhouse production in Oklahoma. Horttechnology 17(2): 269-272. doi: org/10.21273/horttech.17.2.269.
• Cerozi BDS, Fitzsimmons K (2016) The effect of pH on phosphorus availability and speciation in an aquaponics nutrient solution. Bioresource Technology 219: 778-781. doi: org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.079.
• Cocetta G, Quattrini E, Schiavi M, Martinetti L, Spinardi A, Ferrante A (2007) Nitrate and sucrose content in fresh-cut leaves of spinach plants grown in floating system. Agricoltura Mediterranea 137: 79-85.
• Cooper A (1988) 1. The System. 2. Operation of The system. In: The ABC of NFT. Nutrient Film Technique, Grower Books (ed.) ISBN 0901361224 London England, pp. 3-123.
• Çelikel G (2002) Topraksız Kültürde Sebze Yetiştiriciliği. Tarım ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı. Tarımsal Araştırmalar Genel Müdürlüğü. Alata Bahçe Kültürleri Araştırma Enstitüsü Çiftçi Eğitim Broşürü, No: 12, Mersin.
• Engindeniz S (2008) Ispanak üretiminde maliyet ve karlılık analizi. Hasad-Bitkisel Üretim 272: 85-90.
• Ercan N, Bayyurt R (2014) The effects of applications which increase the O2 of the water on yield and quality of lettuce grown in a floating system. Acta Horticulturae 1034: 77-84.
• Ergün O (2011) Su kültüründe yetiştirilen kıvırcık marul bitkisinde mikroalg (Chlorella vulgaris) uygulamasının etkileri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Adana, Türkiye.
• Fadhlillah RH, Dwiratna S, Amaru K (2019) Performance of floating raft fertigation system on water spinach plants (Ipomea reptans Poir.) cultivation. Jurnal Pertanian Tropik (6)2: 165-179. doi: org/10.32734/jpt.v6i2.3124.
• Geravandi M, Farshadfar E, Kahrizi D (2011) Evaluation of some physiological traits as indicators of drought tolerance in bread wheat genotypes. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 58(1): 69-75.
• Kacar B, Kovancı İ (1982) Bitki, Toprak ve Gübrelerde Kimyasal Fosfor Analizleri ve Sonuçların Değerlendirilmesi. Ege Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, No: 354 İzmir.
• Kacar B, Katkat V, Öztürk Ş (2002) Bitki Fizyolojisi, Uludağ Üniversitesi Güçlendirme Vakfı, Yayın No: 198, s. 563.
• Kacar B, İnal A (2008) Bitki Analizleri, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım Ltd. Şti. Yayınları, Yayın No: 1241, Fen Bilimleri 63 (I. Basım) Ankara.
• Kara E (1993) Nitrate accumulation in vegetables. (In Turkish) Ecology 7: 10-13.
• Leal LYC, Souza ER, Santos Junior JA, Santos MA (2020) Comparison of soil and hydroponic cultivation systems for spinach irrigated with brackish water. Scientia Horticulturae 274: 109616. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109616.
• Lee YD, Takakura T (1995) Root cooling for spinach in deep hydroponic culture under high air temperature conditions. Greenhouse environment control and automation. Acta Horticulturae 399: 121-126. doi: org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1995.399.12.
• Lenzi A, Baldi A, Tesi R (2011) Growing spinach in a floating system with different volumes of aerated or non-aerated nutrient solution. Advances in Horticultural Sciences 25(1): 21-25.
• Marr CW (1994) Hydroponic systems. Greenhouse Vegetable Production. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, Kansas, USA.
• Özdestan Ö, Üren A (2010) Nitrate and nitrite in foods (In Turkish). Academic Food Journal 8(6): 35-43.
• Öztekin GB, Uludag T, Tüzel Y (2018) Growing spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) in a floating system with different concentrations of nutrient solution. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 16(3): 3333-3350.
• Ranawade PS, Tidke SD, Kate AK (2017) Comparative cultivation and biochemical analysis of Spinacia oleraceae grown in aquaponics, hydroponics and field conditions. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6(4): 1007-1013. doi: org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.604.125.
• Sensoy S, Turkmen O, Gorgun Y (2011) Determination of suitable sowing dates for spinach production in Van ecological condition. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences 21: 140-145.
• Shah AH, Shah SH, Muneer S, Rehman M (2009) Comparison of two nutrient solution recipes for growing spinach crop in a non-circulating hydroponic system. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 25(3): 405-418.
• Vandam DA, Anderson TS, de Villiers D, Timmons MB (2017) Growth and tissue elemental composition response of spinach (Spinacia oleracea) to hydroponic and aquaponic water quality conditions. Horticulturae 3(2): 32. doi: org/10.3390/- horticulturae 3020032.
• Xiang S, Wu S, Zhang Q, Liu Y, Ruan R (2020) A nitrogen dynamic hydroponic culture on performance and quality of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica). Journal of Plant Nutrition 43(6): 773-783. doi: org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1711942.
• Zou Y, Hu Z, Zhang J, Xie H, Guimbaud C, Fang Y (2016) Effects of pH on nitrogen transformations in media-based aquaponics. Bioresource Technology 210: 81-87. doi: org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.079.