The role of Bio–Fertilizer amendments on aggregate formation
Abstract
In this study, the effects of five different bio-fertilizers (with alone or different combination) on aggregate formation in clay–loam (Typic Xerofluvent) textured soil, in which maize (Zea mays L.) plant was grown, were investigated. The study was conducted as a pot experiment under greenhouse conditions and arranged using Completely Randomized Block Design with three replications for 90 days. The study consisted of eleven experimental treatments: Control (no fertilizer) (K), inorganic fertilizer (15:15:15 compound fertilizer + ammonium nitrate, 33% N) (G), bio–fertilizer containing mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus spp.) (M), bio–fertilizer containing microalgae (Chlorella spp.) (A), bio–fertilizer containing bacteria (Bacillus megaterium KBA–10 + Pantoea agglomerans RK–134 + Pseudomonas fluorescens FDG–37) (BMF), another biofertilizer containing bacteria (Bacillus subtilis PA1 + Paenibacillus azotofixans PA2) (BCP), vermicompost (V), vermicompost + mycorrhizal fungi (VM), vermicompost + microalgae (VA), vermicompost + bacteria (VBMF), vermicompost + bacteria (VBCP). At the end of the experiment, the results showed that bio-fertilizer treatments tended to increase the formation of macro– aggregates. The amount of macro– aggregates was significantly enhanced by treatments compared to control (>4 mm size class by BCP, 4–2 mm size class by M treatment, 2–1 mm size class by M, A and V treatments). The amount of aggregates >4 mm was greatly increased as a result of combined applications of bio–fertilizers and vermicompost.
Keywords
References
- Adesemoye AO, Kloepper JW (2009) Plant–microbes interactions in enhanced fertilizer–use efficiency. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 85: 1–12.
- Ambriz E, Baez–Perez A, Sanchez–Yanez JM, Moutoglis P, Villegas J (2010) Fraxinus–Glomus–Pisolithus Symbiosis: Plant growth and soil aggregation effects. Pedobiologia 53(6): 369–373.
- Amellal N, Bartoli F, Villemin G, Talouizte A, Heulin T (1999) Effects of inoculation of EPS–producing Pantoea Agglomerans on wheat rhizosphere aggregation. Plant and Soil 211: 93–101.
- Andrade G, Mihara, KL, Linderman RG, Bethlenfalvay GJ (1998) Soil aggregation status and rhizobacteria in the mycorrhizosphere. Plant and Soil 202: 89–96.
- Bagyaraj DJ (1984) Biological interactions with VA mycorrhizal fungi. In: C. L. l. Powell and DJ. Bagyaraj (Editors), VA Mycorrhiza. CRC Press, pp. 131–153, Boca Raton, FL.
- Bedini S, Pellegrino E, Avio L, Pellegrini S, Bazzoffi P, Argese E, Giovannetti M (2009) Changes in soil aggregation and glomalin–related soil protein content as affected by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species Glomus mosseae and Glomus intraradices. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 41: 1491–1496.
- Bezzate S, Aymerich S, Chambert R, Czarnes S, Berge O, Heulin T (2000) Disruption of the Paenibacillus Polymyxa levansucrase gene impairs its ability to aggregate soil in the wheat rhizosphere. Environmental Microbiology 2 (3): 333–342.
- Black CA (1965) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2, Amer. Society of Agronomy Inc., Publisher Madisson, pp. 1372–1376, Wilconsin, USA.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Agricultural Engineering
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Mehmet Sönmez
This is me
AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ, TOPRAK BİLİMİ VE BİTKİ BESLEME BÖLÜMÜ
Türkiye
Erdem Yılmaz
AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ, TOPRAK BİLİMİ VE BİTKİ BESLEME BÖLÜMÜ
Türkiye
Publication Date
December 26, 2016
Submission Date
February 10, 2016
Acceptance Date
July 29, 2016
Published in Issue
Year 2016 Volume: 29 Number: 3
