Bazı sofralık erkenci kayısı (Prunus armeniaca L.) çeşitlerinin Manavgat/Antalya ekolojik şartlarındaki verim ve kalite özellikleri üzerinde araştırmalar

Abstract

 Bu çalışma 2013-2014 yılları arasında Manavgat/Antalya koşullarında ‘Beliana’, ‘Feriana’, ‘Ninfa’ ve ‘Precoce de Tyrinthe’ kayısı (Prunus armeniaca L.) çeşitlerinin fenolojik ve pomolojik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Çiçeklenme dönemleri, derim zamanları, meyve ağırlığı, çekirdek ağırlığı, asitlik, toplam suda çözünebilir kuru madde miktarı (% Sçkm) ve ağaç başına verim değerleri saptanmıştır. 'Ninfa' kayısısı meyvelerini 2013'de 7 Mayıs, 2014'de 8 Mayıs tarihlerinde olgunlaştırmıştır. 'Ninfa' her iki deneme yılında da erkencilik bakımından diğer çeşitlere göre daha üstün bulunmuştur. Verim bakımından 'Ninfa' 2013 yılında (98.50 kg ağaç^-1) ve 2014 yılında ise (108 kg ağaç^-1) ile en verimli çeşit olmuştur. Her iki deneme yılında da en iri meyveler Precoce de Tyrinthe çeşidinden elde edilmiştir. 'Ninfa' erkencilik bakımından; 'Precoce de Tyrinthe' ise meyve kalitesi bakımından Manavgat yöresi için ümitvar olarak saptanmıştır. Bu çalışma ile verim, erkencilik ve kalite bakımından düşük rakımlı alanlarda, erkenci kayısı üretiminde, üreticiler için en kazançlı olan çeşitlerin tespiti yapılmıştır.

Keywords

• Kayısı,Verim,Çiçeklenme,Erkencilik,Meyve Kalitesi

Investigations on yield and quality characteristics of some early table apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivars in Manavgat (Antalya) ecological conditions

Abstract

This research was carried out in Manavgat-Antalya to determine the phenological and pomological characteristics of ‘Beliana’, ‘Feriana’, ‘Ninfa’ and ‘Precoce de Tyrinthe’ apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivars in 2013 and 2014 years. Flowering period, harvesting date, fruit weight, seed weight, acidity, total soluble solids (TSS%) and yield tree-¹  were determined ‘Ninfa’ apricot fruits were harvested on 7 May 2013 and 8 May 2014. ‘Ninfa’ was considered to be superior with respect to earliness in both trial years. In terms of fruit yield, ‘Ninfa’ was found to be the most productive with 98.50 kg tree-¹ in 2013 and 108 kg tree-¹ in 2014. The largest fruit were observed in ‘Precoce de Tyrinthe’ apricot cultivar in two experimental years. ‘Ninfa’, regarding earliness and ‘Precoce de Tyrinthe’, with regard to fruit quality, were found to be the most promising cultivars for the Manavgat area. This study has determined the kinds of the most profitable apricot for early growing for farmers by testing values of yield, earliness and quality in low altitude areas.

Keywords

• Apricot,Yield,Blooming,Earliness,Fruit quality

References

1. Anonymous (1987) Agricultural structure and production (TYU). D. I. E., Ankara.
2. Anonymous (2015) Meteorological data for Antalya. Retrieved 27 February 2015, from http://www.mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?m=ANTALYA#sfB.
3. Asma BM, Kan T, Birhanli O, Abaci T, Erdogan A (2007) Multiple purpose apricot breeding project. Turkey V. National Horticultural Crops Congress, Erzurum, 1: 145-149.
4. Ayanoglu H, Saglamer M (1986) The first results on the adaptation of the apricot cultivars grown in the Mediterranean coast line. Derim, 31(1): 3-15.
5. Ayanoglu H, Kaska N, Yildiz A (1995) Researches on the adaptation of the early apricot cultivars in the Mediterranean Region. Turkey II. National Horticultural Crops Congress, Adana, 1: 144-148.
6. Bahar A, Son L (2017) Yield and quality characteristics of several table apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivars in the Silifke/Mersin ecological. Journal of the American Pomological Society, 71(2): 97-102.
7. Baktir I, Ulger S, Yayici ZH (1992) A Research on the development and the adaptation of some foreign origin apricot varieties to the conditions of Antalya. Turkey I. National Horticultural Crops Congress, Izmir, pp. 461-464.
8. Balta F, Kaya T, Yarılgaç T, Kazankaya A, Balta MF, Koyuncu MA, (2002) Promising apricot genetic resources from the Lake Van Region. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 49: 409–413.

9. Bircan M, Pinar H, Yilmaz C, Caliskan T (2007) Some pomological fruit characteristics of table apricot cultivars in Mediterranean Region. Turkey V. National Horticultural Crops Congress, Erzurum, pp. 437-443.
10. Crisosto CH, Mitcham EJ, Kader AA (2013) Recommendations for maintaining postharvest quality. http://postharvest.ucdavis.edu/PFfruits/apricot. Accesed March 20 2013. Cukadar K, Demirel H, Unlu HM, Aslay M, Bozbek O (2007) Apricot cultivar selection II. Turkey V. National Horticultural Crops Congress, Erzurum, pp. 391-395.
11. Duzgunes O (1963) Statistics principles and methods in scientific researches. Ege University Press, Izmir, p. 375.
12. FAOSTAD (2015) Statistical database, www.fao.org. Accessed July 08 2014.
13. Kafkas E, Paydas S, Burgut A (2007) Yield and some fruit characteristics of table apricot cultivars from Mediterrenean Region. Turkey V. National Horticultural Crops Congress, Erzurum, pp. 235-240.
14. Karlidag H, Bolat I (2007) Investigation on changes in the physical and chemical characteristics of the fruit Sekerpare and Kabaasi apricot varieties grown at high altitudes. Turkey V. National Horticultural Crops Congress, Erzurum, pp. 776-781.
15. Kaska N, Onur C, Onur S, Demiroren S (1982) The Problems about the apricot, plum and peach cultivation in the Mediterranean Region. Symposium on the Problems About Horticultural Crops Cultivation, Solving Methods and Researces to be Done in the Mediterranean Region. Incekum-Alanya, pp. 469-496.
16. Kaska N, Yilmaz KU (2001) Researches on the table apricot growing in Kahramanmaras. I. Stone Fruit Symposium, Yalova, pp. 593-601.
17. Onal K, Ozakman S, Ozkarakas I (1995) Determining the promising early apricot varieties (P. armeniaca L.) in the conditions of Aegean Region. Turkey II. International Horticultural Crops Congress, Adana, pp. 159-163.
18. Paydas S, Kaşka N, Polat AA, Gubbuk H (1992) Researches on the adaptation of some new cultivars of apricots (P. armeniaca L.) to the ecological conditions of Adana (1990-1991 research period). Turkey I International Horticultural Crops Congress, Izmir, pp. 465-469.
19. Paydas S, Kaska N, Durgac C (1995) Resarches on the yield and fruit quality criterias of some apricot varieties in the Subtropical Conditions. Turkey II. International Horticultural Crops Congress, Adana, pp. 149-153.
20. Polat AA (1986) Researches on the adaptation of some local and foreign origin apricot cultivars to the conditions of Adana. Undergraduate Thesis, C.U., Institute of Science, Cukurova University, Adana.
21. Rodrigo J, Julion C (2006) Spring frost damage in buds, flowers and developing fruits in apricot. Acta Horticulturae, 717: 87-89.
22. Ruiz D, Company JA, Egea J (2006) Chilling requirements of apricot varieties. Acta Horticulturae, 717: 67-69.
23. Seferoglu HG, Gulsen AD (2003) Development performance of some apricot varieties in Aydin ecology, Turkey IV. National Horticultural Crops Congress, Antalya, pp. 78-80.
24. Yildiz A, Keles D, Demirtas B, Kaska N, Ilgin M, Paydas S, Eti S, Kuden A, Polat A, Ayanoglu H, Durgac C, Tekintas E, Demirel H, Onur C (2001) The studies on preparation of export-oriented early apricot growing and marketing in the Mediterranean and the Aegean Region. The First Symposium of Stone Fruits, Yalova, pp. 585-592.
25. Yilmaz KU, Paydas S, Kafkas S (2007) A new apricot variety both dried and table for Malatya provinces. Turkey V. National Horticultural Crops Congress, Erzurum, pp. 647-651.