Factors Affecting Women's Knowledge and Behavior About Reproductive Health and Delivery Method Preferences

Abstract

ÇOK ÖNEMLİ NOT: Sistem tam metin dosyası içerisinde yer alan özet metni bu alana eklediğimizde ilerlemeye izin vermiyor. Bu nedenle makale özetini ekleyemedik. Aşağıda yer alan özeti dikkate almayınız. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sociodemographic characteristics, laboratory findings, medical conditions and Beck Depression scores of patients admitted to toxicology intensive care due to suicidal attempt. Material and Methods: Research is cross-sectional. The study is conducted in Toxicology intensive care between 01.05.2018-30.04.2019. A total of 135 male and female individuals aged 18 and over are included in the study. Data for the study are collected with a 60-question data collection form and a 21-question Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Arithmetic mean±standard deviation, frequency distributions and percentages are used to summarize the data. Relationships between categorical data are evaluated by Chi-square test. Statistically, p<0.05 is considered significant. Results: The average age of the study group, 70.4% of which were women, was 27.74±11.72. 20.1% (n=27) of the participants stated that they have attempted suicidal at least once before. 56.3% (n=18) of those who previously attempted suicidal reported that they tried to commit suicide by drinking drug. 53.3% of the applicants were symptomatic because of suicidal attempt. While 92.6% (n=125) of the patients were discharged with health, 7.4% (n=10) were transferred to another clinic. The mean score that patients received from BDI was 22.78±14.87. 37.8% of the participants (n=51) ranged from 0 to 16; 62.2% (n=84) scored between 17 and 63. Conclusion: As a result of the study, it is determined that one-fifth of patients had attempted suicide at least once before the current attempt. As a result of our research, two thirds of the patients received high scores from BDI which are considered to be at risk for depression.

Keywords

• Delivery method
• reproductive health
• sexual health

References

1. 1. World Health Organization (WHO), Reproductive health, 2020. Available at http://www.who.int/topics/reproductive_health/en/
2. 2. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Ana Çocuk Sağlığı ve Aile Planlaması Genel Müdürlüğü. Üreme Sağlığına Giriş Katılımcı Kitabı. Ankara; 2009.
3. 3. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Ana Çocuk Sağlığı ve Aile Planlaması Genel Müdürlüğü. Güvenli Annelik Katılımcı Kitabı. Ankara; 2009.
4. 4. Mylones I, Friese K. Indications for and risks of elective caesarean section. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015; 112(29-30): 489-495.
5. 5. Das V, Kumar N, Kumari V, Agarwal A, Pandey A, Agrawal S. Increasing rates of cesarean section, an upcoming public health problem: an audit of cesarean section in a tertiary care center of North India based on Robson classification. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017; 6(11): 4998-5002.
6. 6. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü. Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması, 2003. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü, Sağlık Bakanlığı Ana Çocuk Sağlığı ve Aile Planlaması Genel Müdürlüğü, Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı ve Avrupa Birliği, Ankara: Türkiye; 2004.
7. 7. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü. Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması, 2013. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü, T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı ve TÜBİTAK, Ankara: Türkiye; 2014.
8. 8. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü. Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması, 2018. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü, T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı ve TÜBİTAK, Ankara: Türkiye; 2019.

9. 9. Özkan S, Sakal FN, Avcı E, Civil EF, Tunca MZ. Kadınların doğum yöntemi tercihi ve ilişkili faktörler. Turk J Public Health. 2013; 11(2): 59-71.
10. 10. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for thesocial, behavioral, andbiomedicalsciences. Behavior Research Methods. 2007; 39: 175-191.
11. 11. Öztaş Ö, Baydar Artantaş A, Kayhan Tetik B, Yalçıntaş A, Üstü Y, Uğurlu M. 18-49 yaş grubu evli kadınların üreme sağlığı ve kontrasepsiyon hakkındaki bilgi, tutum ve davranışları. Ankara Medical Journal. 2015; 15(2): 67-76.
12. 12. Johnson S, Pion C, Jennings V. Current methods and attitudes of women towards contraception in Europe and America. Reproduc¬tive Health. 2013; 10(7): 1-9.
13. 13. Sağıroğlu Çeliker P, Karataş Eray İ, Yurdakul FE, Yavuz AF. Assessment of contraceptive method preferences and pregnancy rates during method usage of women. Ankara Medical Journal. 2017; 17(1): 21-28.
14. 14. Melaku YA, Berhane Y, Kinsman J, Reda HL. Sexual and reproductive health communication and awareness of contraceptive methods among secondary school female students, northern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14: 252.
15. 15. Oni TE, Prinsloo EAM, Nortje JD, Joubert G. High school students' attitudes, practices and knowledge of contraception in Jozini, KwaZulu-Natal. South African Family Practice. 2005; 47(6): 54-57.
16. 16. Sunita TH, Desai RM. Knowledge, attitude and practice of contraception among women attending a tertiary care hospital in India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 2(2): 172-176.
17. 17. Pehlivanoğlu EFÖ, Sarı HB, Balcıoğlu H, Ünlüoğlu İ. Aile hekimliği polikliniğine başvuran kadın hastaların Human Papilloma Virüs aşılaması ve serviks kanseri hakkında bilgi,tutum ve davranışlarının değerlendirilmesi. Ortadogu Medical Journal. 2019; 11(4): 456-460.
18. 18. Şen S, Başar FK. Kütahya bölgesinde yaşayan kadınların pap smear testi konusundaki farkındalıkları. STED. 2019; 28(1): 28-36.
19. 19. Turnbull D, Wilkinson C, Yaser A, Carty V, Svigos J, Robinson J. Women's role and satisfaction in the decision to have a caesarean section. Med J Aust. 1999; 170: 580-583.
20. 20. WHO, Global Health Observatory Data Repository Maternal and Reproductive Health Births by Ceserian Section. Available at https://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main.BIRTHSBYCAESAREAN?lang=en
21. 21. Lee SI, Khang YH, Lee MS. Women's attitudes toward mode of delivery in South Korea a society with high cesarean section rates. Birth. 2004; 31(2): 108-116.
22. 22. Duran ET, Atan ŞÜ. Kadınların sezaryen/vajinal doğuma ilişkin bakış açılarının kalitatif analizi. Genel Tıp Dergisi. 2011; 21(3): 83-88.
23. 23. Stjernholm YV, Petersson K, Eneroth E. Changed indications for cesarean sections. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010; 89(1): 49-53.
24. 24. Fenwick J, Staff L, Gamble J, Creedy DK, Bayes S. Why do women request caesarean section in a normal, healthy first pregnancy? Midwifery. 2010; 26(4): 394-400.
25. 25. Hopkins K. Are Brazilian women really choosing to deli¬very by cesarean? Soc Sci Med. 2000; 51(5): 725-740.
26. 26. Boyle A, Reddy UM. Epidemiology of cesarean delivery: The scope of the problem. Semin Perinatol. 2012; 36: 308-314.
27. 27. Yanıkkerem E, Göker A, Piro N. Sezaryen doğum yapan kadınların doğum yöntemleri hakkında düşünceleri ve aldıkları bakım memnuniyeti. Selçuk Tıp Derg. 2013; 29(2): 75-81.