Yabancı dilde üstbilişsel farkındalığın açık öğretimi

Abstract

Kurumsal bağlamlarda hedef dile maruziyetin sınırlı kaldığı durumlarda, açık öğretim yabancı dil didaktiğine ilişkin çağdaş tartışmalarda merkezi bir yer tutmaktadır. Bu bağlamda ele alınan boyutlar arasında, üst dilbilimsel farkındalık sıklıkla açık dilsel bilgilerin yapılandırılması ve dikkatin biçime yönlendirilmesiyle ilişkilendirilmektedir. Bu makale, yabancı dilde üst dilbilimsel farkındalığın açık öğretimine odaklanan ampirik çalışmaların eleştirel ve betimleyici nicel bir sentezini sunmaktadır. 2000–2024 yılları arasında yayımlanmış bir dizi çalışmaya dayanan analiz, bu tür pedagojik müdahalelerin dil öğreniminin farklı alanları üzerindeki raporlanan etkilerini betimlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu alanlar arasında özellikle dilbilgisel doğruluk ve sözcüksel gelişim, daha sınırlı ölçüde ise anlama ve üretim becerileri yer almaktadır. Kurumsal bağlamda yürütülen deneysel çalışmalar ile tanınmış nicel sentezlerden elde edilen bulgular, açık öğretimin genel olarak olumlu etkilere sahip olduğunu göstermekte; ancak bu etkilerin müdahalelerin süresine, öğretim düzeyine ve hedeflenen dilsel becerilere bağlı olarak belirgin bir değişkenlik sergilediğini de ortaya koymaktadır. Makale ayrıca, literatürde sıkça karşılaşılan metodolojik sınırlılıkları, özellikle öğretim düzeneklerindeki heterojenliği ve ölçme araçlarının dağınıklığını vurgulamakta; bu durumun kümülatif karşılaştırmaların kapsamını sınırladığını göstermektedir. Bu çerçevede sunulan sentez, genellenebilir sonuçlar ortaya koymaktan ziyade, gözlemlenen etkileri yorumlanabilir büyüklük düzeyleri içinde konumlandırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Son olarak, Cezayir’de yabancı dil olarak Fransızca öğretimi bağlamıyla kurulan karşılaştırmalı bir perspektif, kurumsal kısıtlar ve çokdilli öğrenme ortamlarının özgüllükleri dikkate alındığında, sonuçların bağlamsallaştırılmış bir biçimde okunmasının önemini ortaya koymaktadır.

Keywords

• Üst dilbilimsel farkındalık
• açık öğretim
• yabancı dil
• betimleyici nicel sentez.

Explicit instruction of metalinguistic awareness in a foreign language

Abstract

In institutional contexts where exposure to the target language remains limited, explicit instruction occupies a central place in contemporary debates in foreign language education. Among the dimensions mobilized in this regard, metalinguistic awareness is frequently associated with the structuring of explicit linguistic knowledge and the orientation of attention toward form. This article offers a critical, descriptive quantitative synthesis of empirical studies devoted to the explicit teaching of metalinguistic awareness in a foreign language. Drawing on a body of studies published between 2000 and 2024, the analysis aims to characterize the reported effects of this type of pedagogical intervention across different domains of language learning, notably grammatical accuracy, lexical development, and, to a lesser extent, comprehension and production skills. The available findings, derived from recognized quantitative syntheses and experimental studies conducted in institutional settings, indicate overall favorable effects of explicit instruction, while also revealing marked variability related to the duration of interventions, the level of instruction, and the targeted competencies. The article also highlights recurring methodological limitations in the literature, particularly the heterogeneity of instructional designs and the dispersion of measurement instruments, which constrain the scope of cumulative comparisons. From this perspective, the proposed synthesis seeks less to establish generalizable conclusions than to situate the observed effects within interpretable orders of magnitude. Finally, a contextualization with reference to the teaching of French as a foreign language in Algeria underscores the value of a situated reading of the results, attentive to institutional constraints and the specificities of plurilingual learning environments.

Keywords

• Metalinguistic awareness
• explicit instruction
• foreign language
• descriptive quantitative synthesis

Enseignement explicite de la conscience métalinguistique en langue étrangère

Abstract

Dans les contextes institutionnels où l’exposition à la langue cible demeure limitée, l’enseignement explicite occupe une place centrale dans les débats contemporains en didactique des langues étrangères. Parmi les dimensions mobilisées à cet égard, la conscience métalinguistique est fréquemment associée à la structuration de connaissances linguistiques explicites et à l’orientation de l’attention vers la forme. Le présent article propose une synthèse critique et quantitative descriptive des travaux empiriques consacrés à l’enseignement explicite de la conscience métalinguistique en langue étrangère. S’appuyant sur un ensemble d’études publiées entre 2000 et 2024, l’analyse vise à caractériser les effets rapportés de ce type d’intervention pédagogique sur différents domaines de l’apprentissage linguistique, notamment la précision grammaticale, le développement lexical et, dans une moindre mesure, les compétences de compréhension et de production. Les résultats disponibles, issus de synthèses quantitatives reconnues et d’études expérimentales en contexte institutionnel, indiquent des effets globalement favorables de l’enseignement explicite, tout en faisant apparaître une variabilité notable liée à la durée des interventions, au niveau d’enseignement et aux compétences ciblées. L’article met également en évidence les limites méthodologiques récurrentes de la littérature, notamment l’hétérogénéité des dispositifs et la dispersion des instruments de mesure, qui restreignent la portée des comparaisons cumulatives. Dans cette perspective, la synthèse proposée vise moins à établir des conclusions généralisables qu’à situer les effets observés dans des ordres de grandeur interprétables. Enfin, une mise en perspective avec le contexte de l’enseignement du français langue étrangère en Algérie souligne l’intérêt d’une lecture contextualisée des résultats, attentive aux contraintes institutionnelles et aux spécificités des environnements plurilingues.

Keywords

• Conscience métalinguistique
• enseignement explicite
• langue étrangère
• synthèse quantitative descriptive

References

1. Akakura, M. (2012). The role of explicit instruction in implicit knowledge for L2 acquisition: The case of English articles. Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 1–29.
2. Benati, A. (2005). The effects of processing instruction, traditional instruction and meaning-output instruction on the acquisition of the English past simple tense. Language Teaching Research, 9(1), 67–93.
3. Benati, A., & Batziakas, B. (2017). The effects of explicit information and processing instruction on the acquisition of English adjectival agreement. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 55(1), 21–42.
4. Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
5. DeKeyser, R. M., & Suzuki, Y. (2015). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten, G. D. Keating, & S. Wulff (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (4th ed., pp. 157–182). Routledge.
6. Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press.
7. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 339–368.
8. Erlam, R. (2003). The effects of deductive and inductive instruction on the acquisition of direct object pronouns in French as a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 242–260.

9. Gombert, J.-É. (1990). Le développement métalinguistique. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France.
10. Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 445–474.
11. Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1–26.
12. Lee, J. F., & Benati, A. (2007). Delivering processing instruction in classrooms and virtual contexts: Research and practice. Language Teaching Research, 11(3), 309–331.
13. Macaro, E., & Masterman, L. (2006). Does intensive explicit grammar instruction make all the difference? The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 297–312.
14. Nassaji, H. (2009). Effects of recasts and elicitation in dyadic interaction and the role of feedback explicitness. Language Learning, 59(2), 411–452.
15. Nassaji, H. (2016). The role of explicit instruction in the development of L2 learners’ metalinguistic awareness. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 509–523.
16. Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (Eds.) (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative contexts. New York, NY : Routledge.
17. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
18. Nezakat-Alhossaini, M., Youhanaee, M., & Moinzadeh, A. (2014). Impact of explicit instruction on EFL learners’ implicit and explicit knowledge: A case of English relative clauses. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 10(2), 183–199.
19. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528.
20. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.
21. Rassaei, E. (2015). Oral corrective feedback, foreign language anxiety and L2 development: A classroom study. System, 49, 98–109.
22. Saito, K., & Hanzawa, S. (2016). Examining the effects of explicit and implicit instruction on L2 pronunciation development. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 475–493.
23. Sanz, C., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). Positive evidence versus explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer-assisted study. Language Learning, 54(1), 35–78.
24. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.
25. Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 255–283.
26. Shintani, N. (2011). A comparative study of the effects of input-based and production-based instruction on vocabulary acquisition by young EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 137–158.
27. Shintani, N., Ellis, R., & Suzuki, W. (2014). Effects of implicit and explicit instruction on the acquisition of English plural –s by Japanese learners. Language Learning, 64(4), 837–872.
28. Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 263–308.
29. Zhang, Y. (2021). The effectiveness of explicit instruction on the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology in L2 learners. Language Teaching Research, 25(1), 119–140.