Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Factors predicting recurrence ın operated locally advanced gastric cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy

Year 2023, Volume: 16 Issue: 2, 239 - 246, 17.08.2023

Abstract

Aim: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used to increase tumor resection rates, prevent metastasis and prolong survival. It is not fully understood which factors are important in recurrence after surgery. In our study, the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment duration, tumor histopathology, and biochemical values on postoperative recurrence in gastric cancer patients were investigated. Method: Our study included 61 patients who were diagnosed with locally advanced gastric cancer and underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The duration of treatment with neoadjuvant, the number of pathological lymph nodes removed during surgery, preoperative albumin level, and postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) values were compared and evaluated according to the recurrence status. Results: The mean age of our patients was 58.70±10.58 years. In patients who developed recurrence after surgery, the number of pathological lymph nodes removed during surgery and the postoperative CEA value was found to be statistically significantly higher (p <0.001, p=0.005, respectively), and high preoperative albumin levels reduced recurrence (HR=0.016). Conclusion: In our study, it was shown that preoperative albumin level and postoperative CEA value were associated with the development of recurrence after surgery in gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy.

References

  • Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660.
  • Fitzmaurice C, Abate D, Abbasi N, et al. Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(12):1749-1768. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2996.
  • Balakrishnan M, George R, Sharma A, Graham DY. Changing Trends in Stomach Cancer Throughout the World. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017;19(8):36. doi: 10.1007/s11894-017-0575-8.
  • Choi IJ, Kim CG, Lee JY, et al. Family History of Gastric Cancer and Helicobacter pylori Treatment. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(5):427-436. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1909666.
  • Serra O, Galán M, Ginesta MM, et al. Comparison and applicability of molecular classifications for gastric cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019;77:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.05.005.
  • Ma J, Shen H, Kapesa L, Zeng S. Lauren classification and individualized chemotherapy in gastric cancer. Oncol Lett. 2016;11(5):2959-2964. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4337.
  • Goetze OT, Al-Batran S-E, Chevallay M, Mönig SP. Multimodal treatment in locally advanced gastric cancer. Updates in Surgery. 2018;70(2):173-179. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0539-z.
  • Tokunaga M, Sato Y, Nakagawa M, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer in Japan: current and future perspectives. Surgery Today. 2020;50(1):30-37. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01896-5.
  • Lumish MA, Ku GY. Approach to Resectable Gastric Cancer: Evolving Paradigm of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatment. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022;23(7):1044-1058. doi: 10.1007/s11864-021-00917-1.
  • Sun J, Wang X, Zhang Z, et al. The Sensitivity Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11:641304. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.641304.
  • Xu AM, Huang L, Liu W, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for gastric carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086941.
  • Ai S, Sun F, Liu Z, et al. Change in serum albumin level predicts short-term complications in patients with normal preoperative serum albumin after gastrectomy of gastric cancer. ANZ J Surg. 2019;89(7-8):E297-e301. doi: 10.1111/ans.15363.
  • Wang YH, Kang JK, Zhi YF, et al. The pretreatment thrombocytosis as one of prognostic factors for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018;53:304-311. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.084.
  • Yu JH, Wang ZZ, Fan YC, et al. Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery vs. surgery alone for locally advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2021;134(14):1669-1680. doi: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000001603.
  • Inagaki K, Kanda M, Nakanishi K, et al. Accurate Prediction of Prognosis After Radical Resection of Gastric Cancer by the Modified Systemic Inflammation Score; a Multicenter Dataset Analysis. World Journal of Surgery. 2021;45(8):2513-2520. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06138-9.
  • Wu L, Liang Y, Zhang C, et al. Prognostic significance of lymphovascular infiltration in overall survival of gastric cancer patients after surgery with curative intent. Chin J Cancer Res. 2019;31(5):785-796. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2019.05.08.
  • Aoyama T, Komori K, Tamagawa A, et al. Clinical Influence of the Lymph Node Ratio on Lymph Node Metastasis-positive Gastric Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Treatment. In Vivo. 2022;36(2):994-1000. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12792.
  • Shannon AB, Straker RJ, Keele L, et al. Lymph Node Evaluation after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients with Gastric Cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2022;29(2):1242-1253. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10803-7.
  • Uda H, Kanda M, Tanaka C, et al. Perioperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels Predict Recurrence and Survival of Patients with Pathological T2-4 Gastric Cancer Treated with Curative Gastrectomy. Dig Surg. 2018;35(1):55-63. doi: 10.1159/000471931.
  • Zhao J, Wang G, Jiang ZW, et al. Patients Administered Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Could be Enrolled into an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Program for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer. Chin Med J (Engl). 2018;131(4):413-419. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.225047.
  • Yu H, Xu L, Yin S, et al. Risk Factors and Prognostic Impact of Postoperative Complications in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Curr Oncol. 2022;29(9):6496-6507. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29090511.
  • Migita K, Matsumoto S, Wakatsuki K, et al. A decrease in the prognostic nutritional index is associated with a worse long-term outcome in gastric cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Surgery Today. 2017;47(8):1018-1026. doi: 10.1007/s00595-017-1469-y.
  • Toiyama Y, Yasuda H, Ohi M, et al. Clinical impact of preoperative albumin to globulin ratio in gastric cancer patients with curative intent. Am J Surg. 2017;213(1):120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.05.012.
  • Joliat GR, Schoor A, Schäfer M, et al. Postoperative decrease of albumin (ΔAlb) as early predictor of complications after gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review. Perioper Med (Lond). 2022;11(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13741-022-00238-3.

Neoadjuvan kemoterapi uygulanan opere lokal ileri evre mide kanseri hastalarında nüksü öngören faktörler

Year 2023, Volume: 16 Issue: 2, 239 - 246, 17.08.2023

Abstract

Amaç: Neoadjuvan kemoterapi, tümör rezeksiyon oranlarını arttırmak, metastazı önlemek ve sağkalımı uzatmak amacıyla kullanılmaktadır. Cerrahi sonrası nükste hangi faktörlerin önemli olduğu tam olarak anlaşılamamıştır. Çalışmamızda mide kanseri hastalarında neoadjuvan kemoterapi tedavi süresi, tümör histopatolojisi ve biyokimyasal değerlerin cerrahi sonrası nüks üzerindeki etkisi araştırılmıştır. Yöntem: Çalışmamıza lokal ileri evre mide kanseri tanısı olan, neoadjuvan kemoterapi sonrası cerrahi uygulanan 61 hasta dahil edildi. Hastaların neoadjuvan ile tedavi süresi, cerrahide çıkarılan patolojik lenf nodu sayısı, preoperatif albümin seviyesi, postoperatif karsiyoembriyonik antijen (CEA) değerleri karşılaştırılıp, nüks durumuna göre değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Hastalarımızın yaş ortalaması 58.70±10.58’dir. Cerrahi sonrası nüks gelişen hastalarda cerrahide çıkarılan patolojik lenf nodu sayısının ve postoperatif CEA değerinin istatistiksel olarak önemli düzeyde daha fazla olduğu (sırasıyla p <0.001, p=0.005), preoperatif albümin seviyesinin yüksekliğinin nüksü azalttığı (HR=0.016) bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Çalışmamızda neoadjuvan tedavi alan mide kanseri hastalarında, preoperatif albümin seviyesi ve postoperatif CEA değerinin cerrahi sonrası nüks gelişimi ile ilişkili olduğu gösterilmiştir.

References

  • Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660.
  • Fitzmaurice C, Abate D, Abbasi N, et al. Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(12):1749-1768. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2996.
  • Balakrishnan M, George R, Sharma A, Graham DY. Changing Trends in Stomach Cancer Throughout the World. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017;19(8):36. doi: 10.1007/s11894-017-0575-8.
  • Choi IJ, Kim CG, Lee JY, et al. Family History of Gastric Cancer and Helicobacter pylori Treatment. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(5):427-436. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1909666.
  • Serra O, Galán M, Ginesta MM, et al. Comparison and applicability of molecular classifications for gastric cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019;77:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.05.005.
  • Ma J, Shen H, Kapesa L, Zeng S. Lauren classification and individualized chemotherapy in gastric cancer. Oncol Lett. 2016;11(5):2959-2964. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4337.
  • Goetze OT, Al-Batran S-E, Chevallay M, Mönig SP. Multimodal treatment in locally advanced gastric cancer. Updates in Surgery. 2018;70(2):173-179. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0539-z.
  • Tokunaga M, Sato Y, Nakagawa M, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer in Japan: current and future perspectives. Surgery Today. 2020;50(1):30-37. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01896-5.
  • Lumish MA, Ku GY. Approach to Resectable Gastric Cancer: Evolving Paradigm of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatment. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022;23(7):1044-1058. doi: 10.1007/s11864-021-00917-1.
  • Sun J, Wang X, Zhang Z, et al. The Sensitivity Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11:641304. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.641304.
  • Xu AM, Huang L, Liu W, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for gastric carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086941.
  • Ai S, Sun F, Liu Z, et al. Change in serum albumin level predicts short-term complications in patients with normal preoperative serum albumin after gastrectomy of gastric cancer. ANZ J Surg. 2019;89(7-8):E297-e301. doi: 10.1111/ans.15363.
  • Wang YH, Kang JK, Zhi YF, et al. The pretreatment thrombocytosis as one of prognostic factors for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018;53:304-311. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.084.
  • Yu JH, Wang ZZ, Fan YC, et al. Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery vs. surgery alone for locally advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2021;134(14):1669-1680. doi: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000001603.
  • Inagaki K, Kanda M, Nakanishi K, et al. Accurate Prediction of Prognosis After Radical Resection of Gastric Cancer by the Modified Systemic Inflammation Score; a Multicenter Dataset Analysis. World Journal of Surgery. 2021;45(8):2513-2520. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06138-9.
  • Wu L, Liang Y, Zhang C, et al. Prognostic significance of lymphovascular infiltration in overall survival of gastric cancer patients after surgery with curative intent. Chin J Cancer Res. 2019;31(5):785-796. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2019.05.08.
  • Aoyama T, Komori K, Tamagawa A, et al. Clinical Influence of the Lymph Node Ratio on Lymph Node Metastasis-positive Gastric Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Treatment. In Vivo. 2022;36(2):994-1000. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12792.
  • Shannon AB, Straker RJ, Keele L, et al. Lymph Node Evaluation after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients with Gastric Cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2022;29(2):1242-1253. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10803-7.
  • Uda H, Kanda M, Tanaka C, et al. Perioperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels Predict Recurrence and Survival of Patients with Pathological T2-4 Gastric Cancer Treated with Curative Gastrectomy. Dig Surg. 2018;35(1):55-63. doi: 10.1159/000471931.
  • Zhao J, Wang G, Jiang ZW, et al. Patients Administered Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Could be Enrolled into an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Program for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer. Chin Med J (Engl). 2018;131(4):413-419. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.225047.
  • Yu H, Xu L, Yin S, et al. Risk Factors and Prognostic Impact of Postoperative Complications in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Curr Oncol. 2022;29(9):6496-6507. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29090511.
  • Migita K, Matsumoto S, Wakatsuki K, et al. A decrease in the prognostic nutritional index is associated with a worse long-term outcome in gastric cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Surgery Today. 2017;47(8):1018-1026. doi: 10.1007/s00595-017-1469-y.
  • Toiyama Y, Yasuda H, Ohi M, et al. Clinical impact of preoperative albumin to globulin ratio in gastric cancer patients with curative intent. Am J Surg. 2017;213(1):120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.05.012.
  • Joliat GR, Schoor A, Schäfer M, et al. Postoperative decrease of albumin (ΔAlb) as early predictor of complications after gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review. Perioper Med (Lond). 2022;11(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13741-022-00238-3.
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ertuğrul Bayram 0000-0001-8713-7613

İ. Oğuz Kara 0000-0003-4963-2028

Early Pub Date August 1, 2023
Publication Date August 17, 2023
Submission Date March 31, 2023
Acceptance Date June 9, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 16 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Bayram, E., & Kara, İ. O. (2023). Neoadjuvan kemoterapi uygulanan opere lokal ileri evre mide kanseri hastalarında nüksü öngören faktörler. Mersin Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(2), 239-246.
AMA Bayram E, Kara İO. Neoadjuvan kemoterapi uygulanan opere lokal ileri evre mide kanseri hastalarında nüksü öngören faktörler. Mersin Univ Saglık Bilim derg. August 2023;16(2):239-246.
Chicago Bayram, Ertuğrul, and İ. Oğuz Kara. “Neoadjuvan Kemoterapi Uygulanan Opere Lokal Ileri Evre Mide Kanseri hastalarında nüksü öngören faktörler”. Mersin Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 16, no. 2 (August 2023): 239-46.
EndNote Bayram E, Kara İO (August 1, 2023) Neoadjuvan kemoterapi uygulanan opere lokal ileri evre mide kanseri hastalarında nüksü öngören faktörler. Mersin Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 16 2 239–246.
IEEE E. Bayram and İ. O. Kara, “Neoadjuvan kemoterapi uygulanan opere lokal ileri evre mide kanseri hastalarında nüksü öngören faktörler”, Mersin Univ Saglık Bilim derg, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 239–246, 2023.
ISNAD Bayram, Ertuğrul - Kara, İ. Oğuz. “Neoadjuvan Kemoterapi Uygulanan Opere Lokal Ileri Evre Mide Kanseri hastalarında nüksü öngören faktörler”. Mersin Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 16/2 (August 2023), 239-246.
JAMA Bayram E, Kara İO. Neoadjuvan kemoterapi uygulanan opere lokal ileri evre mide kanseri hastalarında nüksü öngören faktörler. Mersin Univ Saglık Bilim derg. 2023;16:239–246.
MLA Bayram, Ertuğrul and İ. Oğuz Kara. “Neoadjuvan Kemoterapi Uygulanan Opere Lokal Ileri Evre Mide Kanseri hastalarında nüksü öngören faktörler”. Mersin Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 16, no. 2, 2023, pp. 239-46.
Vancouver Bayram E, Kara İO. Neoadjuvan kemoterapi uygulanan opere lokal ileri evre mide kanseri hastalarında nüksü öngören faktörler. Mersin Univ Saglık Bilim derg. 2023;16(2):239-46.

MEU Journal of Health Sciences Assoc was began to the publishing process in 2008 under the supervision of Assoc. Prof. Gönül Aslan, Editor-in-Chief, and affiliated to Mersin University Institute of Health Sciences. In March 2015, Prof. Dr. Caferi Tayyar Şaşmaz undertook the Editor-in Chief position and since then he has been in charge.

Publishing in three issues per year (April - August - December), it is a multisectoral refereed scientific journal. In addition to research articles, scientific articles such as reviews, case reports and letters to the editor are published in the journal. Our journal, which has been published via e-mail since its inception, has been published both online and in print. Following the Participation Agreement signed with TÜBİTAK-ULAKBİM Dergi Park in April 2015, it has started to accept and evaluate online publications.

Mersin University Journal of Health Sciences have been indexed by Turkey Citation Index since November 16, 2011.

Mersin University Journal of Health Sciences have been indexed by ULAKBIM Medical Database from the first issue of 2016.

Mersin University Journal of Health Sciences have been indexed by DOAJ since October 02, 2019.

Article Publishing Charge Policy: Our journal has adopted an open access policy and there is no fee for article application, evaluation, and publication in our journal. All the articles published in our journal can be accessed from the Archive free of charge.

154561545815459

Creative Commons Lisansı
This work is licensed with Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International.