Farklı dik yön büyüme paternine sahip iskeletsel Sınıf I bireylerde frontal ve maksiller sinüs boyutlarının değerlendirilmesi

Year 2024, Volume: 17 Issue: 2, 278 - 288, 16.08.2024

Saniye Merve Cengiz , Gökhan Türker

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, frontal ve maksiller sinüslerin boyutlarının iskeletsel Sınıf I ilişkiye sahip bireylerde dik yön büyüme paternlerindeki farklılıklardan ve cinsiyet farklılıklarından etkilenip etkilenmediğinin lateral sefalometrik radyografiler kullanılarak değerlendirilmesidir. Yöntem: Bu retrospektif çalışmada iskeletsel Sınıf I ilişkiye sahip (038°) bireylerden oluşan üç gruba ayrılmıştır. Her grupta yer alan 20 bireye (10 kadın ve 10 erkek) ait dijital lateral sefalometrik radyografiler üzerinde frontal ve maksiller sinüs ölçümleri yapılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde, tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis, bağımsız örneklem t-testi ve Mann-Whitney U testi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Frontal ve maksiller sinüslere ait yükseklik, genişlik, yüzey alanı ve indeks ölçümleri açısından gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar bulunmamıştır (p˃0.05). Cinsiyetler arası karşılaştırmalarda ortalama maksiller sinüs genişliği ve frontal sinüs yüksekliği hariç tüm parametrelerde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmuş (p<0.05) ve frontal sinüs indeksi dışındaki tüm parametrelerin erkeklerde kadınlara göre daha yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sonuç: Dik yön büyüme paternindeki farklılıkların frontal ve maksiller sinüs boyutlarını ve bu sinüslere ait indeks değerlerini etkilemediği görülmüştür. Erkek bireylerde frontal ve maksiller sinüs boyutlarının kadın bireylere göre daha büyük olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

Frontal sinüs, maksiller sinüs, dik yön büyüme paterni

Evaluation of frontal and maxillary sinus dimensions in skeletal Class I individuals with different vertical growth patterns

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the dimensions of the frontal and maxillary sinuses are affected by differences in vertical direction growth patterns and gender differences in individuals with skeletal Class I relationships, using lateral cephalometric radiographs. Method: In this retrospective study, 60 individuals (30 females, 30 males, mean age; 18.07 ± 1.77 years) with skeletal Class I relationship (038°) individuals. Frontal and maxillary sinus measurements were performed on digital lateral cephalometric radiographs of 20 individuals (10 females, 10 males) in each group. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis, independent samples t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyze the data. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of height, width, surface area and index measurements of the frontal and maxillary sinuses (p>0.05). In comparisons between genders, statistically significant differences were found in all parameters except the mean maxillary sinus width and frontal sinus height (p<0.05), and all parameters except the frontal sinus index were determined to be higher in males compared to females. Conclusion: It was observed that the differences in vertical growth pattern did not effect the frontal and maxillary sinus dimensions and index values of these sinuses. It was determined that the frontal and maxillary sinuses dimensions were larger in males compared to females.

Keywords

Frontal sinus, maxillary sinus, vertical growth pattern

References

• Sawada M, Suetake S, Yamada H, Higashino M, Abe S, Tanaka E. Orthodontic Treatment Does Not Affect Frontal Sinus Development in Female Adults: A Clinical Study. J Clin Med. 2023;12(3):778.
• Duque CS, Casiano RR. Surgical anatomy and embryology of the frontal sinus. In: The Frontal Sinus. Springer; 2005:21-31.
• Yassaei S, Emami A, Mirbeigi S. Cephalometric association of mandibular size/length to the surface area and dimensions of the frontal and maxillary sinuses. Eur J Dent. 2018;12(2):253-261.
• Nuñez-Castruita A, López-Serna N, Guzmán-López S. Prenatal development of the maxillary sinus: a perspective for paranasal sinus surgery. Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg. 2012;146(6):997-1003.
• Jun BC, Song SW, Park CS, Lee DH, Cho KJ, Cho JH. The analysis of maxillary sinus aeration according to aging process; volume assessment by 3-dimensional reconstruction by high-resolutional CT scanning. Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg. 2005;132(3):429-434.
• Urabi AH, Al-Nakib LH. Digital lateral cephalometric assessment of maxillary sinus dimensions in different skeletal classes. J Bagh College Dent. 2012;24(1):35-38.
• Kwak HH, Park HD, Yoon HR, Kang MK, Koh KS, Kim HJ. Topographic anatomy of the inferior wall of the maxillary sinus in Koreans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;33(4):382-388.
• Jones N. The nose and paranasal sinuses physiology and anatomy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001;51(1-3):5-19.
• Page DC, Mahony D. The airway, breathing and orthodontics. Todays FDA. 2010;22(2):43-47.
• Okşayan R, Sökücü O, Yeşildal S. Evaluation of maxillary sinus volume and dimensions in different vertical face growth patterns: a study of cone-beam computed tomography. Acta Odontol Scand. 2017;75(5):345-349.
• Gadekar NB, Kotrashetti VS, Hosmani J, Nayak R. Forensic application of frontal sinus measurement among the Indian population. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2019;23(1):147.
• Buyuk SK, Karaman A, Yasa Y. Association between frontal sinus morphology and craniofacial parameters: A forensic view. J Forensic Leg Med. 2017;49:20-23.
• Soman BA, Sujatha GP, Lingappa A. Morphometric evaluation of the frontal sinus in relation to age and gender in subjects residing in Davangere, Karnataka. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016;8(1):57.
• Patil AA, Revankar AV. Reliability of the frontal sinus index as a maturity indicator. Indian J Dent Res. 2013;24(4):523.
• Kiran CS, Ramaswamy P, Khaitan T. Frontal sinus index – A new tool for sex determination. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2014;2:77-79.
• Metin-Gürsoy G, Akay G, Balos Tuncer B. Frontal sinus: is it a predictor for vertical malocclusions? Anat Sci Int. 2021;96(1):62-69.
• Al-Ani RA, Al-Mashhadany SM, Al-Chalabi HMH. The size of maxillary sinus in subjects with different vertical discrepancies (a lateral cephalometric study). Iraqi Orthod J. 2011;7(1):30-34.
• Endo T, Abe R, Kuroki H, Kojima K, Oka K, Shimooka S. Cephalometric evaluation of maxillary sinus sizes in different malocclusion classes. Odontology. 2010;98:65-72.
• Emirzeoglu M, Sahin B, Bilgic S, Celebi M, Uzun A. Volumetric evaluation of the paranasal sinuses in normal subjects using computer tomography images: a stereological study. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2007;34(2):191-195.
• Cruz CV, Mattos CT, Maia JC, et al. Genetic polymorphisms underlying the skeletal Class III phenotype. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;151(4):700-707.
• Valverde Y, Watanabe N, Yamaki M, Saito I. The frontal sinus enlargement as an indicator of growth maturity in class III patients-A pilot study. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2013;2(2):451-455.
• Salehi P, Heidari S, Khajeh F. Relationship between frontal sinus surface area and mandibular size on lateral cephalograms of adults. J Isfahan Dent Sch. 2012;8:244-250.
• Abate A, Gaffuri F, Lanteri V, et al. A CBCT based analysis of the correlation between volumetric morphology of the frontal sinuses and the facial growth pattern in caucasian subjects. A cross-sectional study. Head Face Med. 2022;18(1):1-12.
• Khaitan T, Kabiraj A, Ginjupally U, Jain R. Cephalometric analysis for gender determination using maxillary sinus index: a novel dimension in personal identification. Int J Dent. 2017:1-4.
• Shah RK, Dhingra JK, Carter BL, Rebeiz EE. Paranasal sinus development: a radiographic study. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(2):205-209.
• Tikku T, Khanna R, Sachan K, Srivastava K, Munjal N. Dimensional changes in maxillary sinus of mouth breathers. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2013;3(1):9-14.
• Camargo JR, Daruge E, Prado FB, et al. The frontal sinus morphology in radiographs of Brazilian subjects: its forensic importance. J Morphol Sci. 2017;24(4).
• Asantogrol F, Etoz M, Topsakal KG, Can FE. Evaluation of the maxillary sinus volume and dimensions in different skeletal classes using cone beam computed tomography. Ann Med Res. 2021;28(4):709-715.
• Kale B, Buyukcavus MH. Farklı Büyüme Paternine Sahip İskeletsel Sınıf III Vakalarda Maksiller Sinüs Boyutlarının Retrospektif Olarak İncelenmesi. Suleyman Demirel University J Health Sci. 2019;10(4):344-348.
• Tunca M, Kaplan V, Yesim K, Tunca Y. The relationship between frontal sinus dimensions and skeletal malocclusion. Eur Oral Res. 2022;56(3):130-135.