Sahiplik Yoğunlaşmasının Firma Değeri Üzerine Etkisi: Borsa İstanbul'da Bir Uygulama
Abstract
Keywords
References
- Agrawal, A. and Mandelker, G. N. 1990. Large shareholders and the monito- ring of managers: the case of antitakeover charter amendments. iournal of Financial and quantitative analysis, 25(02), 143-161.
- Alimehmeti, G. and Paletta, A. 2012. Ownership concentration and effects over firm performance: evidences from Italy. European Scientific Journal,8(22).
- Arellano, M. and Bond, S. 1991, Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.
- Arellano, M. and Bover, O. 1995, Another look at the instrumental variable es- timation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51 .
- Barclay, M.J. and Holderness, CG. 1991 . Negotiated block trades and corpo- rate control. The Journal of Finance. 46 (3), 861—878.
- Bebchuk, L. A. 1999. A rent-protection theory of corporate ownership and cont- rol (No. w7203). National Bureau of Economic Research
- Beiner, 3., Drobetz, W, Schmid, M.M. and Zimmermann, H. 2006. An integ- rated framework of corporate governance and firm valuation. European Financial Management. 12(2), 249-283.
- Berle, A.A. and Means, G.C. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Pro- perty. New York, US: Macmillan.
- Cho, M.-H. 1998. Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate value: an empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics. 47, 103-121.
- Claessens, S., Diankov, S., Fan, J.P.H. and Lang, L.H.P. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance. 57(6), 2741-2771.