BibTex RIS Cite

SAHİPLİK YOĞUNLAŞMASININ FİRMA DEĞERİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: BORSA İSTANBUL’DA BİR UYGULAMA

Year 2015, Volume: 1 Issue: 104, 167 - 181, 19.12.2015

Abstract

References

  • Agrawal, A. and Mandelker, G. N. 1990. Large shareholders and the monito- ring of managers: the case of antitakeover charter amendments. iournal of Financial and quantitative analysis, 25(02), 143-161.
  • Alimehmeti, G. and Paletta, A. 2012. Ownership concentration and effects over firm performance: evidences from Italy. European Scientific Journal,8(22).
  • Arellano, M. and Bond, S. 1991, Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.
  • Arellano, M. and Bover, O. 1995, Another look at the instrumental variable es- timation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51 .
  • Barclay, M.J. and Holderness, CG. 1991 . Negotiated block trades and corpo- rate control. The Journal of Finance. 46 (3), 861—878.
  • Bebchuk, L. A. 1999. A rent-protection theory of corporate ownership and cont- rol (No. w7203). National Bureau of Economic Research
  • Beiner, 3., Drobetz, W, Schmid, M.M. and Zimmermann, H. 2006. An integ- rated framework of corporate governance and firm valuation. European Financial Management. 12(2), 249-283.
  • Berle, A.A. and Means, G.C. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Pro- perty. New York, US: Macmillan.
  • Cho, M.-H. 1998. Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate value: an empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics. 47, 103-121.
  • Claessens, S., Diankov, S., Fan, J.P.H. and Lang, L.H.P. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance. 57(6), 2741-2771.
  • Çıtak, L. 2007. The impact of ownership structure on company performance; a panel data analysis on Istanbul Stock Exchange Listed (ISE-100) compani- es. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics. 9, 231-245.
  • Demsetz, H. 1983. The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. Jour- nal of Law and Economics. 26(2), 375-390.
  • Demsetz, H. and Lehn, K. 1985. The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy. 93(6), 1 155-1 177.
  • Ersoy, E., Bayrakdaroğlu, A. ve Şamiloğlu, F. 201 1. Tijrkiye’de kurumsal yö- netim ve firma performansı (Tobin-Q ve Anormal Getiri) arasındaki ilişkinin analizi. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi. 48(554), 71-84.
  • Ersoy, E., ve Çetenak, E. H. 2015. Sahiplik yoğunlaşmasının temettü dağıtım kararlarına etkisi: Borsa Istanbul'da bir uygulama. Ege Akademik Bakış, 15(4)
  • Gönenç, H. 2006. Ownership concentration and corporate performance: a simultaneous equation framework for Turkish companies. SSRN Accepted Paper Series,
  • http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?a bstract_id=498263
  • Hill, C. W., and Snell, S. A. 1989. Effects of ownership structure and control on corporate productivity. Academy of ManagementJournal, 32(1), 25-46.
  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. The ioumal of finance, 54(2), 471-517.
  • McConnel, J.J. and Servaeas, H. 1990. Additional evidence on equity owners- hip and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics. 27, 595-612.
  • Miguel, A., Pindado, J., and De la Torre, C. 2003. How does ownership struc- ture affect firm value? A comparison using different corporate governance systems.
  • http: / / papers.ssrn.com/ so|3 / Pa pers.cfm?abstract_id=479322
  • Miguel, A., Pindado, J., and De la Torre, C. 2004. Ownership structure and firm value: New evidence from Spain. Strategic Management Journal, 25(12), 1199-1207.
  • Selarka, E. 2005. Ownership Concentration and Firm Value: A study from The Indian corporate sector. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 41 (6), 83- 108.
  • Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. The Journal of Political Economy. 94(3), 461-488.
  • Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. 1997. A Survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance. 52(2), 737-783.
  • Thomsen, S. 2005. Conflicts of interest aligned incentives? Blockholder ow- nership, dividends and firm value in the US and EU. European Business Organization Law Review. 6(2), 201-225.
  • Thomsen, S., Pedersen, T. and Kivst, H.K. 2006. Blockholder ownership: effect on firm value in market and control based governance systems. Journal of Corporate Finance. 12, 246-269.

Sahiplik Yoğunlaşmasının Firma Değeri Üzerine Etkisi: Borsa İstanbul'da Bir Uygulama

Year 2015, Volume: 1 Issue: 104, 167 - 181, 19.12.2015

Abstract

References

  • Agrawal, A. and Mandelker, G. N. 1990. Large shareholders and the monito- ring of managers: the case of antitakeover charter amendments. iournal of Financial and quantitative analysis, 25(02), 143-161.
  • Alimehmeti, G. and Paletta, A. 2012. Ownership concentration and effects over firm performance: evidences from Italy. European Scientific Journal,8(22).
  • Arellano, M. and Bond, S. 1991, Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.
  • Arellano, M. and Bover, O. 1995, Another look at the instrumental variable es- timation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51 .
  • Barclay, M.J. and Holderness, CG. 1991 . Negotiated block trades and corpo- rate control. The Journal of Finance. 46 (3), 861—878.
  • Bebchuk, L. A. 1999. A rent-protection theory of corporate ownership and cont- rol (No. w7203). National Bureau of Economic Research
  • Beiner, 3., Drobetz, W, Schmid, M.M. and Zimmermann, H. 2006. An integ- rated framework of corporate governance and firm valuation. European Financial Management. 12(2), 249-283.
  • Berle, A.A. and Means, G.C. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Pro- perty. New York, US: Macmillan.
  • Cho, M.-H. 1998. Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate value: an empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics. 47, 103-121.
  • Claessens, S., Diankov, S., Fan, J.P.H. and Lang, L.H.P. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance. 57(6), 2741-2771.
  • Çıtak, L. 2007. The impact of ownership structure on company performance; a panel data analysis on Istanbul Stock Exchange Listed (ISE-100) compani- es. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics. 9, 231-245.
  • Demsetz, H. 1983. The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. Jour- nal of Law and Economics. 26(2), 375-390.
  • Demsetz, H. and Lehn, K. 1985. The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy. 93(6), 1 155-1 177.
  • Ersoy, E., Bayrakdaroğlu, A. ve Şamiloğlu, F. 201 1. Tijrkiye’de kurumsal yö- netim ve firma performansı (Tobin-Q ve Anormal Getiri) arasındaki ilişkinin analizi. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi. 48(554), 71-84.
  • Ersoy, E., ve Çetenak, E. H. 2015. Sahiplik yoğunlaşmasının temettü dağıtım kararlarına etkisi: Borsa Istanbul'da bir uygulama. Ege Akademik Bakış, 15(4)
  • Gönenç, H. 2006. Ownership concentration and corporate performance: a simultaneous equation framework for Turkish companies. SSRN Accepted Paper Series,
  • http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?a bstract_id=498263
  • Hill, C. W., and Snell, S. A. 1989. Effects of ownership structure and control on corporate productivity. Academy of ManagementJournal, 32(1), 25-46.
  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. The ioumal of finance, 54(2), 471-517.
  • McConnel, J.J. and Servaeas, H. 1990. Additional evidence on equity owners- hip and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics. 27, 595-612.
  • Miguel, A., Pindado, J., and De la Torre, C. 2003. How does ownership struc- ture affect firm value? A comparison using different corporate governance systems.
  • http: / / papers.ssrn.com/ so|3 / Pa pers.cfm?abstract_id=479322
  • Miguel, A., Pindado, J., and De la Torre, C. 2004. Ownership structure and firm value: New evidence from Spain. Strategic Management Journal, 25(12), 1199-1207.
  • Selarka, E. 2005. Ownership Concentration and Firm Value: A study from The Indian corporate sector. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 41 (6), 83- 108.
  • Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. The Journal of Political Economy. 94(3), 461-488.
  • Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. 1997. A Survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance. 52(2), 737-783.
  • Thomsen, S. 2005. Conflicts of interest aligned incentives? Blockholder ow- nership, dividends and firm value in the US and EU. European Business Organization Law Review. 6(2), 201-225.
  • Thomsen, S., Pedersen, T. and Kivst, H.K. 2006. Blockholder ownership: effect on firm value in market and control based governance systems. Journal of Corporate Finance. 12, 246-269.
There are 28 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Emin Hüseyin Çetenak This is me

Publication Date December 19, 2015
Submission Date December 19, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 1 Issue: 104

Cite

APA Çetenak, E. H. (2015). Sahiplik Yoğunlaşmasının Firma Değeri Üzerine Etkisi: Borsa İstanbul’da Bir Uygulama. Maliye Ve Finans Yazıları, 1(104), 167-181.
  • The journal specializes in especially in all the fields of finance and banking.