Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

İç Girişimcilik Eğilimine İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Uygulamalarından Bakış

Year 2017, Issue: Özel Sayı 1, 133 - 154, 01.10.2017

Gaye Özçelik

Abstract

Girişimcilik olgusunun işletmelerin içsel faaliyetlerine yönel mesi, iç girişimcilik kavramını ortaya çıkarmıştır. İç girişimcilik ve yenilikçiliğin desteklenmesi konusunda, yüksek performanslı iş sis temleri (YPİS) içinde ele alınan insan kaynakları yönetimi (İKY) uy gulamaları önemli bir yere sahiptir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, stratejik İKY’nde uyum ve esneklik yaklaşımı çerçevesinde YPİS içinde ele alınan İKY uygulamalarının örgütlerdeki iç girişimcilik eğilimine olası etkilerini kavramsal bir çerçevede incelemektir. Ayrıca, iç girişimcilik ve yenilikçiliği destekleyebileceği düşünülen yüksek performanslı İKY uygulamalarındaki değişimlerden örnekler veril mektedir.

Keywords

Yüksek Performanslı İş Sis temleri (YPİS) İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi (İKY) Stratejik Uyum ve Esneklik iç girişimcilik

References

  • Agca, H.ve U. Ba$. 2016. I9 Girisimcilik, Girisimcilik iginde, ed. Himmet Kara- dal, Istanbul: Beta Yayincilik, 271-282.
  • Agca, V. ve M. Kurt. 2007. I9 Girisimcilik ve Temel Beli rleyicileri: Kavramsal Bir (^er^eve, Erciyes Universitesi iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi, 29: 83-112.
  • Akdogan, A. A. ve A. Cingoz. 2015. Stratejik insan Kaynaklari Yonetiminin I9 Girisimcilik (Girisimsel Performans) Uzerindeki Etkileri: Kayseri Imalat Sana- yinde Bir Arastirma, Marmara Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusii Hakemli Dergisi, 43: 1-25.
  • Alpkan, L., Bulut, Q., Giinday, G., ve K. K1I19. 2010. Organizational support for intrapreneurship and its interaction with human capital to enhance inno¬vative performance, Management Decision, 48(5): 732-755.
  • Angeles M-S, ve D. R. Soriano. 2011. Human resource management and cor¬porate entrepreneurship, International Journal of Manpower, 32(1 ):6-l 3.
  • Antoncic, B. 2000. Intrapreneurship: Construct Refinement and An Integrative Model Development, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Case Western Reserve University.
  • Antoncic, B. ve R. D. Hisrich. 2001. Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation, Journal of Business Venturing, 16: 495-527.
  • Antoncic, B. ve R. D. Hisrich. 2003. Clarfying the intrapreneurship concept, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(1 ):7-24.
  • Appelbaum, E. Ve P. Berg. 2001. High-performance work systems and labor market structures, In I. Berg and A. L. Kalleberg (eds.) Sourcebook of Labor Markets. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 271-294.
  • Ataay, I. D. ve A. C. Acar. 2013. Ucret Yonetimi, Insan Kaynaklari Yonetimi iqnde. Istanbul: Beta Yayincilik, 351-449.
  • Baird, L. ve I. Meshoulam. 1988. Managing two fits of strategic human reso¬urce management", Academy of Management Review, 13(1): 116-128.
  • Basilgan, M. 201 1. Ekonomik Geli$menin Yaratici Yikimi: Schumpeteryan Giri- $imci, Amme Idaresi Dergisi, 44(3):27-56.
  • Becker, B. E. ve B. Gerhart. 1996. The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of Ma¬nagement Journal, 39 (4):779-801.
  • Becker, B. E. ve M. A. 2006. Strategic Human Resources Management: Where Do We Go From Here?, Journal of Management, 32(6): 900- 925.
  • Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bowen, D. ve C. Ostroff. 2004. Understanding HRM-Firm Performance Linka¬ges: The Role of the 'Strength' of the HRM System, Academy of Manage¬ment Review, 29(2): 203-221.
  • Burgers, J. H., Jansen, J.P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J. ve H. W. Volberda. 2009. Structural differentiation and corporate venturing: The modera¬ting role of formal and informal integration mechanisms, Journal of Busi¬ness Venturing, 24(3): 206-220.
  • Carpenter, M. A, Bauer, T. ve B. Erdogan. 2014. Principles of Management, Flat World Knowledge, Inc.
  • Daft, R. L., Murphy, J., ve H. Willmott. 2010. Organization Theory and Design. Singapore. South-Western.
  • Evans, W. R. ve W. D. Davis. 2005. High-performance work systems and or¬ganizational performance: The mediating role of internal social structure. Journal of Management, 31 (5): 758-775.
  • Den Hartog, Deanne N. ve R. M. Verburg, 2004. High performance work systems, organizational culture and perceived organizational effectiveness. Human Resource Management Journal, 14(1): 55-78.
  • Guthrie, J. P. 2001. High-Involvement Work Practices, Turnover, and Pro¬ductivity: Evidence from New Zealand. The Academy of Management, 44(1): 180-190.
  • Elmas-Atay Sevgi, Ger^ek, M. ve C. B. Uyargil. 2017. Yuksek Performansh is Sistemlerinin Orgute Baglihk Uzerindeki Etkisine ili§kin Bir Ara$tirma, Su¬leyman Demirel Universitesi iktisadi ve idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi, 22: 253-266.
  • European Commission Directorate-General for Enterprise 2004. Innovation Management and The Knowledge Driven Economy, Brussels-Luxembourg, 5-30.
  • Hayton, J. C. 2005. Competing in the new economy: the effect of intellectu¬al capital on corporate entrepreneurship in high-technology new ventures. R&D Management, 35: 137-155.
  • Hisrich, R.D. ve M. P. Peters. 1992. Entrepreneurship Starting, Developing and Managing A New Enterprise, Irwin, Boston.
  • Hitt, Michael A., Keats, B. W., ve S. M. DeMarie. 1998. Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advan¬tage in the 21st century. The Academy of Management Executive 12(4): 22-42.
  • Holm, A. 2012. E-recruitment: Towards an Ubiquitous Recruitment Process and Candidate Relationship Management, Zeitschrift fur Personalforschung, 26(3): 241-259.
  • Huselid, M. A. 1995. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3): 635-672.
  • Hutchinson, L. 2003. ABC of learning and teaching: Educational environment. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 326.7393: 810.
  • Jackson, S. 2013. Behavioral Perspective of Strategic Human Resource Ma¬nagement, In Kessler, E. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Management Theory. Thou¬sand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Jackson, S. R. ve R. E. Schuler. 1995. Understanding human resource manage¬ment in the context of their organizations and environment, Annual Review of Psyschology, 46: 237-264.
  • Jiang, J. Y., ve C-W Liu. 2015. High performance work systems and orga¬nizational effectiveness: The mediating role of social capital. Human Resource Management Review 25(1): 1 26-137.
  • Kanter, R. M. 1985. Supporting innovation and venture development in es¬tablished companies, Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1): 47-60.
  • Kaya, N. 2006. The impact of human resource management practices and corporate entrepreneurship on firm performance: evidence from Tur¬kish firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(12): 2074-2090.
  • Kaygin, E. 2012. Surdurulebilir Bir Rekabet Avantaji Saglamamn Yolu: I9 Gi¬risimcilik Anlayi$i, Sosyal ve Be$eri Bilimler Dergisi, 4(1), (2012): 93-103.
  • Denton, K. 2006. High performance work systems: the sum really is greater than its parts", Measuring Business Excellence, 10(4): 4-7.
  • Kert, S. B. 2016. E-Ogrenme Projelerinde Yer Alan Tasarim ve Geli$tirme Uz- manlari Uzerine Bir Alanyazin £ah$masi, YILDIZ Journal of Educational Research, 1 (1): 100-124.
  • Khan, B. H. 2005. ed. Managing e-learning: Design, delivery, implementation, and evaluation. IGI Global.
  • Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby J. S. ve M. G. Goldsby. 2004. Sustaining corporate entrepreneurship: modelling perceived implementation and outcome com¬parisons at organizational and individual levels. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 5(2): 77-89.
  • Kuvaas, B., ve A. Dysvik. 2009. Perceived investment in permanent employee development and social and economic exchange perceptions among tem¬porary employees. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(10): 2499- 2524.-
  • Lumpkin, G. Tom ve G. G. 1996. Dess. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orien¬tation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1): 135-172.
  • Messersmith, J. G. ve W. J. Wales. 2013. Entrepreneurial orientation and per¬formance in young firms: The role of human resource management. Interna¬tional Small Business Journal, 31 (2): 115-136.
  • Miller, D., 1983. The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms, Management Science, 29(7): 770-791.
  • Montoro-Sanchez, A., Soriano, D. R. 2011. Human resource management and corporate entrepreneurship, International Journal of Manpower, 32(1): 6-13.
  • Morris, M., ve F. F. Jones. 1993. Human resource management practices and corporate entrepreneurship: an empirical assessment from the USA, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 4.4 (1993): 873- 896.
  • Naktiyok, A., ve S. B. Kok. 2006. (^evresel Faktorlerin I9 Girisimcilik Uzerine Etkileri, Afyon Kocatepe Uni. i.I.B.F. Dergisi, 8(2): 77-96.
  • Organ, D. W. 1988. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.
  • Pinchot III, G. 1985. Intrapreneuring: Why you don't have to leave the corpo¬ration to become an entrepreneur. New York: Perennial Library.
  • Sanchez, R. 1995. Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic Ma¬nagement Journal, 16(1): 135-159.
  • Schmelter, R., Mauer R., Borsch, C., ve Brettel, M. 2010. Boosting corpo¬rate entrepreneurship through HRM practices: Evidence from German SMEs. Human Resource Management. 49(4): 715-741.
  • Schuler, R. S. 1986. Fostering and facilitating entrepreneurship in organi¬zations: Implications for organization structure and human resource ma¬nagement practices. Human Resource Management, 25(4): 607-629.
  • Schuler, R. S., ve S. E. Jackson. 1987. Linking competitive strategies with human resource management practices. The Academy of Management Executive, 1(3): 207-219.
  • Truss, C., ve L. Gratton. 1994. Strategic human resource management: A conceptual approach. The International Journal of Human Resource Ma¬nagement, 5(3): 663-686.
  • Uyargil, C., L. Tuzuner, F. Aydinh-Kulak, ve S. Elmas-Atay. 2017. Ulusal Yone- tim Ve Organizasyon Kongresi Insan Kaynaklari Yonetimi (IKY) Bildirilerinin 1994-2016 Yillari Arasindaki Degi$im Ve Geli$imi: £e$itli IKY Yakla§imlari Aqsindan Bir Inceleme, 25-27 Mayis 2017, 25. Ulusal Yonetim ve Organi- zasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabi, Ankara, 1279-1288.
  • Uittenbogaard, B., L. Broens, ve A. J. Groen. 2005. Towards a guideline for design of a corporate entrepreneurship function for business development in medium-sized technology-based companies. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(3): 258-271.
  • Wang, Z., Z. Zang, 2005. Strategic Human Resources, Innovation and Ent¬repreneurship Fit", International Journal of Manpower, 26(6): 544-559.
  • Way, S. A. 2002. High performance work systems and intermediate indicators of firm performance within the US small business sector. Journal of Mana¬gement, 28(6): 765-785.
  • Wright, P. M., ve W. R. Boswell. 2002. Desegregating HRM: A review and synthesis of micro and macro human resource management research. Jour¬nal of Management, 28(3): 247-276.
  • Wright, P. M., ve S. A. Snell. 1998. Toward a unifying framework for explo¬ring fit and flexibility in strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 756-772.
  • Wood, S. 1999. Getting the measure of the transformed high-performance organization. British Journal of Industrial Relations 37(3): 391-417.

Intrapreneurship Orientation in Consideration With Human Resources Management Practices

Year 2017, Issue: Özel Sayı 1, 133 - 154, 01.10.2017

Gaye Özçelik

Abstract

Intrapreneurship refers to carrying out entrepreneurial activities in an existing enterprise. Some HR practices which have been found to enable high performance-labeled as high performance work systems (HPWS) - are considered in literature as important dimensions for supporting intrapreneurship and innovation. This study aims at theoretically addressing some potential influences of HPWS on intrapreneurial activities on the basis of fit and flexibility approach in strategic HRM with some examples of changes in HPWS regarding HRM practices.

Keywords

Intrapreneurship High Performance Work Systems (HPWS) Human Resource Management (HRM) Strategic Fit and Flexibility.

References

  • Agca, H.ve U. Ba$. 2016. I9 Girisimcilik, Girisimcilik iginde, ed. Himmet Kara- dal, Istanbul: Beta Yayincilik, 271-282.
  • Agca, V. ve M. Kurt. 2007. I9 Girisimcilik ve Temel Beli rleyicileri: Kavramsal Bir (^er^eve, Erciyes Universitesi iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi, 29: 83-112.
  • Akdogan, A. A. ve A. Cingoz. 2015. Stratejik insan Kaynaklari Yonetiminin I9 Girisimcilik (Girisimsel Performans) Uzerindeki Etkileri: Kayseri Imalat Sana- yinde Bir Arastirma, Marmara Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusii Hakemli Dergisi, 43: 1-25.
  • Alpkan, L., Bulut, Q., Giinday, G., ve K. K1I19. 2010. Organizational support for intrapreneurship and its interaction with human capital to enhance inno¬vative performance, Management Decision, 48(5): 732-755.
  • Angeles M-S, ve D. R. Soriano. 2011. Human resource management and cor¬porate entrepreneurship, International Journal of Manpower, 32(1 ):6-l 3.
  • Antoncic, B. 2000. Intrapreneurship: Construct Refinement and An Integrative Model Development, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Case Western Reserve University.
  • Antoncic, B. ve R. D. Hisrich. 2001. Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation, Journal of Business Venturing, 16: 495-527.
  • Antoncic, B. ve R. D. Hisrich. 2003. Clarfying the intrapreneurship concept, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(1 ):7-24.
  • Appelbaum, E. Ve P. Berg. 2001. High-performance work systems and labor market structures, In I. Berg and A. L. Kalleberg (eds.) Sourcebook of Labor Markets. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 271-294.
  • Ataay, I. D. ve A. C. Acar. 2013. Ucret Yonetimi, Insan Kaynaklari Yonetimi iqnde. Istanbul: Beta Yayincilik, 351-449.
  • Baird, L. ve I. Meshoulam. 1988. Managing two fits of strategic human reso¬urce management", Academy of Management Review, 13(1): 116-128.
  • Basilgan, M. 201 1. Ekonomik Geli$menin Yaratici Yikimi: Schumpeteryan Giri- $imci, Amme Idaresi Dergisi, 44(3):27-56.
  • Becker, B. E. ve B. Gerhart. 1996. The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of Ma¬nagement Journal, 39 (4):779-801.
  • Becker, B. E. ve M. A. 2006. Strategic Human Resources Management: Where Do We Go From Here?, Journal of Management, 32(6): 900- 925.
  • Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bowen, D. ve C. Ostroff. 2004. Understanding HRM-Firm Performance Linka¬ges: The Role of the 'Strength' of the HRM System, Academy of Manage¬ment Review, 29(2): 203-221.
  • Burgers, J. H., Jansen, J.P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J. ve H. W. Volberda. 2009. Structural differentiation and corporate venturing: The modera¬ting role of formal and informal integration mechanisms, Journal of Busi¬ness Venturing, 24(3): 206-220.
  • Carpenter, M. A, Bauer, T. ve B. Erdogan. 2014. Principles of Management, Flat World Knowledge, Inc.
  • Daft, R. L., Murphy, J., ve H. Willmott. 2010. Organization Theory and Design. Singapore. South-Western.
  • Evans, W. R. ve W. D. Davis. 2005. High-performance work systems and or¬ganizational performance: The mediating role of internal social structure. Journal of Management, 31 (5): 758-775.
  • Den Hartog, Deanne N. ve R. M. Verburg, 2004. High performance work systems, organizational culture and perceived organizational effectiveness. Human Resource Management Journal, 14(1): 55-78.
  • Guthrie, J. P. 2001. High-Involvement Work Practices, Turnover, and Pro¬ductivity: Evidence from New Zealand. The Academy of Management, 44(1): 180-190.
  • Elmas-Atay Sevgi, Ger^ek, M. ve C. B. Uyargil. 2017. Yuksek Performansh is Sistemlerinin Orgute Baglihk Uzerindeki Etkisine ili§kin Bir Ara$tirma, Su¬leyman Demirel Universitesi iktisadi ve idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi, 22: 253-266.
  • European Commission Directorate-General for Enterprise 2004. Innovation Management and The Knowledge Driven Economy, Brussels-Luxembourg, 5-30.
  • Hayton, J. C. 2005. Competing in the new economy: the effect of intellectu¬al capital on corporate entrepreneurship in high-technology new ventures. R&D Management, 35: 137-155.
  • Hisrich, R.D. ve M. P. Peters. 1992. Entrepreneurship Starting, Developing and Managing A New Enterprise, Irwin, Boston.
  • Hitt, Michael A., Keats, B. W., ve S. M. DeMarie. 1998. Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advan¬tage in the 21st century. The Academy of Management Executive 12(4): 22-42.
  • Holm, A. 2012. E-recruitment: Towards an Ubiquitous Recruitment Process and Candidate Relationship Management, Zeitschrift fur Personalforschung, 26(3): 241-259.
  • Huselid, M. A. 1995. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3): 635-672.
  • Hutchinson, L. 2003. ABC of learning and teaching: Educational environment. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 326.7393: 810.
  • Jackson, S. 2013. Behavioral Perspective of Strategic Human Resource Ma¬nagement, In Kessler, E. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Management Theory. Thou¬sand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Jackson, S. R. ve R. E. Schuler. 1995. Understanding human resource manage¬ment in the context of their organizations and environment, Annual Review of Psyschology, 46: 237-264.
  • Jiang, J. Y., ve C-W Liu. 2015. High performance work systems and orga¬nizational effectiveness: The mediating role of social capital. Human Resource Management Review 25(1): 1 26-137.
  • Kanter, R. M. 1985. Supporting innovation and venture development in es¬tablished companies, Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1): 47-60.
  • Kaya, N. 2006. The impact of human resource management practices and corporate entrepreneurship on firm performance: evidence from Tur¬kish firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(12): 2074-2090.
  • Kaygin, E. 2012. Surdurulebilir Bir Rekabet Avantaji Saglamamn Yolu: I9 Gi¬risimcilik Anlayi$i, Sosyal ve Be$eri Bilimler Dergisi, 4(1), (2012): 93-103.
  • Denton, K. 2006. High performance work systems: the sum really is greater than its parts", Measuring Business Excellence, 10(4): 4-7.
  • Kert, S. B. 2016. E-Ogrenme Projelerinde Yer Alan Tasarim ve Geli$tirme Uz- manlari Uzerine Bir Alanyazin £ah$masi, YILDIZ Journal of Educational Research, 1 (1): 100-124.
  • Khan, B. H. 2005. ed. Managing e-learning: Design, delivery, implementation, and evaluation. IGI Global.
  • Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby J. S. ve M. G. Goldsby. 2004. Sustaining corporate entrepreneurship: modelling perceived implementation and outcome com¬parisons at organizational and individual levels. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 5(2): 77-89.
  • Kuvaas, B., ve A. Dysvik. 2009. Perceived investment in permanent employee development and social and economic exchange perceptions among tem¬porary employees. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(10): 2499- 2524.-
  • Lumpkin, G. Tom ve G. G. 1996. Dess. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orien¬tation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1): 135-172.
  • Messersmith, J. G. ve W. J. Wales. 2013. Entrepreneurial orientation and per¬formance in young firms: The role of human resource management. Interna¬tional Small Business Journal, 31 (2): 115-136.
  • Miller, D., 1983. The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms, Management Science, 29(7): 770-791.
  • Montoro-Sanchez, A., Soriano, D. R. 2011. Human resource management and corporate entrepreneurship, International Journal of Manpower, 32(1): 6-13.
  • Morris, M., ve F. F. Jones. 1993. Human resource management practices and corporate entrepreneurship: an empirical assessment from the USA, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 4.4 (1993): 873- 896.
  • Naktiyok, A., ve S. B. Kok. 2006. (^evresel Faktorlerin I9 Girisimcilik Uzerine Etkileri, Afyon Kocatepe Uni. i.I.B.F. Dergisi, 8(2): 77-96.
  • Organ, D. W. 1988. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.
  • Pinchot III, G. 1985. Intrapreneuring: Why you don't have to leave the corpo¬ration to become an entrepreneur. New York: Perennial Library.
  • Sanchez, R. 1995. Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic Ma¬nagement Journal, 16(1): 135-159.
  • Schmelter, R., Mauer R., Borsch, C., ve Brettel, M. 2010. Boosting corpo¬rate entrepreneurship through HRM practices: Evidence from German SMEs. Human Resource Management. 49(4): 715-741.
  • Schuler, R. S. 1986. Fostering and facilitating entrepreneurship in organi¬zations: Implications for organization structure and human resource ma¬nagement practices. Human Resource Management, 25(4): 607-629.
  • Schuler, R. S., ve S. E. Jackson. 1987. Linking competitive strategies with human resource management practices. The Academy of Management Executive, 1(3): 207-219.
  • Truss, C., ve L. Gratton. 1994. Strategic human resource management: A conceptual approach. The International Journal of Human Resource Ma¬nagement, 5(3): 663-686.
  • Uyargil, C., L. Tuzuner, F. Aydinh-Kulak, ve S. Elmas-Atay. 2017. Ulusal Yone- tim Ve Organizasyon Kongresi Insan Kaynaklari Yonetimi (IKY) Bildirilerinin 1994-2016 Yillari Arasindaki Degi$im Ve Geli$imi: £e$itli IKY Yakla§imlari Aqsindan Bir Inceleme, 25-27 Mayis 2017, 25. Ulusal Yonetim ve Organi- zasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabi, Ankara, 1279-1288.
  • Uittenbogaard, B., L. Broens, ve A. J. Groen. 2005. Towards a guideline for design of a corporate entrepreneurship function for business development in medium-sized technology-based companies. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(3): 258-271.
  • Wang, Z., Z. Zang, 2005. Strategic Human Resources, Innovation and Ent¬repreneurship Fit", International Journal of Manpower, 26(6): 544-559.
  • Way, S. A. 2002. High performance work systems and intermediate indicators of firm performance within the US small business sector. Journal of Mana¬gement, 28(6): 765-785.
  • Wright, P. M., ve W. R. Boswell. 2002. Desegregating HRM: A review and synthesis of micro and macro human resource management research. Jour¬nal of Management, 28(3): 247-276.
  • Wright, P. M., ve S. A. Snell. 1998. Toward a unifying framework for explo¬ring fit and flexibility in strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 756-772.
  • Wood, S. 1999. Getting the measure of the transformed high-performance organization. British Journal of Industrial Relations 37(3): 391-417.
There are 61 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Growth
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Gaye Özçelik This is me

Publication Date October 1, 2017
Submission Date August 30, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Issue: Özel Sayı 1

Cite

APA Özçelik, G. (2017). İç Girişimcilik Eğilimine İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Uygulamalarından Bakış. Maliye Ve Finans Yazıları(Özel Sayı 1), 133-154.
AMA Özçelik G. İç Girişimcilik Eğilimine İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Uygulamalarından Bakış. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları. October 2017;(Özel Sayı 1):133-154.
Chicago Özçelik, Gaye. “İç Girişimcilik Eğilimine İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Uygulamalarından Bakış”. Maliye Ve Finans Yazıları, no. Özel Sayı 1 (October 2017): 133-54.
EndNote Özçelik G (October 1, 2017) İç Girişimcilik Eğilimine İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Uygulamalarından Bakış. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları Özel Sayı 1 133–154.
IEEE G. Özçelik, “İç Girişimcilik Eğilimine İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Uygulamalarından Bakış”, Maliye ve Finans Yazıları, no. Özel Sayı 1, pp. 133–154, October 2017.
ISNAD Özçelik, Gaye. “İç Girişimcilik Eğilimine İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Uygulamalarından Bakış”. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları Özel Sayı 1 (October 2017), 133-154.
JAMA Özçelik G. İç Girişimcilik Eğilimine İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Uygulamalarından Bakış. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları. 2017;:133–154.
MLA Özçelik, Gaye. “İç Girişimcilik Eğilimine İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Uygulamalarından Bakış”. Maliye Ve Finans Yazıları, no. Özel Sayı 1, 2017, pp. 133-54.
Vancouver Özçelik G. İç Girişimcilik Eğilimine İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Uygulamalarından Bakış. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları. 2017(Özel Sayı 1):133-54.
 Download Cover Image

The scope of the Journal of Finance Letters consists of studies in the fields of economics, public finance, finance, and banking.