Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

‘Sacred Space: A Phenomenological Approach

Year 2017, Volume: 14 Issue: 2, 8 - 22, 28.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.17131/milel.377607

Abstract

Relationship between spaces and human beings is shaped in terms of

passages between perspectives and not in terms of spatial (geometric and

geographic) differences or divisibility. Accordingly, the distinctive aspect

of ‘sacred space’ is the existence of representation which paves a way to a

consciousness of sacred as ‘the nearest and most distant’ at the same time.

Hence sacred space reveals itself as an experience of temporality of passages

between virtually limitless perspectives of this event of representation

References

  • Bürge, S. R.. “Angels, Ritual and Sacred Space in Islam”, Comparative Islamic Studies, 221-245 https://is.muni.cz/el/1423/podzim2014/SAN215/um/43687364/Burge_2009.pdf (08.11.2017).
  • Heidegger, Martin. “Letter on Humanism”, trans. Frank A. Capuzzi, http://pacificinstitute.org/pdf/Letter_on_%20Humanism.pdf
  • Houlgate, Stephen. “Hegel’s Critique of Kant”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume LXXXIX, s. 21-39, http://onlinelibrary.
  • wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2015.00242.x/epdf (09.12.2017)
  • Kaern, Michael (trans.). “The Bridge and The Door By Georg Simmel”, Qualitative Sociology, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1994, ss. 407-412. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02393338.pdf (08.11.2017).
  • Lang, Uwe Michael. “What Makes Architecture “Sacred”?” Logos 17:4 Fall 2014, ss. 45-49.
  • Nicholson, Graeme. “The Ontological Difference” American Philosophical Quarterly,, Vol. 33/4, 1996,ss. 357-374, https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20009875.pdf (09.12.2017)
  • Rots, Aike P. “The “Rediscovery of “Sacred Space” in Contemporary Japan: Intrinsic Quality or Discursive Strategy?” http://publications.nichibun.ac.jp/region/d/NSH/series/symp/2014-03-31/s001/s010/pdf/article.pdf (08.11.2017).
  • Tarizzo, Davide. “The Door”, ss. 131-145, https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofskivestnik/article/.../4227 (09.12.2017).

‘Kutsal Mekan’: Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz

Year 2017, Volume: 14 Issue: 2, 8 - 22, 28.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.17131/milel.377607

Abstract

İnsanlarla mekanlar arasındaki ilişki alansal (geometrik ve coğrafi) ayrımlar

değil, perspektifler arasındaki geçişlilik şeklinde tezahür etmektedir.

Kutsal mekan diye anlaşılan yerin ayırt edici vasfı, kutsalın aynı anda hem

çok yakın hem çok uzak oluşuna dair bilince yol açan bir temsilin varlığı

ve bu temsili oluşturan sonsuz denebilecek perspektifler arasındaki pasaj

durumudur.

References

  • Bürge, S. R.. “Angels, Ritual and Sacred Space in Islam”, Comparative Islamic Studies, 221-245 https://is.muni.cz/el/1423/podzim2014/SAN215/um/43687364/Burge_2009.pdf (08.11.2017).
  • Heidegger, Martin. “Letter on Humanism”, trans. Frank A. Capuzzi, http://pacificinstitute.org/pdf/Letter_on_%20Humanism.pdf
  • Houlgate, Stephen. “Hegel’s Critique of Kant”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume LXXXIX, s. 21-39, http://onlinelibrary.
  • wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2015.00242.x/epdf (09.12.2017)
  • Kaern, Michael (trans.). “The Bridge and The Door By Georg Simmel”, Qualitative Sociology, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1994, ss. 407-412. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02393338.pdf (08.11.2017).
  • Lang, Uwe Michael. “What Makes Architecture “Sacred”?” Logos 17:4 Fall 2014, ss. 45-49.
  • Nicholson, Graeme. “The Ontological Difference” American Philosophical Quarterly,, Vol. 33/4, 1996,ss. 357-374, https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20009875.pdf (09.12.2017)
  • Rots, Aike P. “The “Rediscovery of “Sacred Space” in Contemporary Japan: Intrinsic Quality or Discursive Strategy?” http://publications.nichibun.ac.jp/region/d/NSH/series/symp/2014-03-31/s001/s010/pdf/article.pdf (08.11.2017).
  • Tarizzo, Davide. “The Door”, ss. 131-145, https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofskivestnik/article/.../4227 (09.12.2017).
There are 9 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Burhanetti Tatar

Publication Date December 28, 2017
Submission Date September 13, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 14 Issue: 2

Cite

ISNAD Tatar, Burhanetti. “‘Kutsal Mekan’: Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz”. Milel ve Nihal 14/2 (December 2017), 8-22. https://doi.org/10.17131/milel.377607.