Pedagojik Liderlik: Bir Ölçek Uyarlama Çalışması

Year 2023, , 2643 - 2662, 01.11.2023

Rıza Akkaya , Uğur Özalp

https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1179932

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Grosin (2004) tarafından geliştirilen, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması Hellström ve Hagquist (2021) tarafından yapılan Pedagojik Liderlik Ölçeği (PLÖ)’nin Türkçeye uyarlaması yapılmıştır. Ölçeğin dilsel eşdeğerliğini sağlamak amacıyla orijinal İsveççe halinden ve çeşitli araştırmalarda yer verilen İngilizce hallerinden birbirinden bağımsız dil uzmanlarına çeviriler yaptırılmış ve karşılaştırılmıştır. Elde edilen nihai ölçek formu 2021-2022 eğitim-öğretim yılında Türkiye’nin çeşitli şehirlerinde görev yapmakta olan 304 öğretmene uygulanmıştır. Toplanan veriler üzerinden ölçeğin yapısını doğrulamak üzere WLSMV kestirim yöntemi kullanılarak doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır. Elde edilen uyum indeks değerleri ölçeğin 16 maddeden oluşan 2 boyutlu yapısını doğrulanmıştır. PLÖ’nün 2 faktörlü yapısına ilişkin iç güvenirliği test etmek amacıyla Cronbach Alfa (α), Tabakalı Alfa (αt) ve Bileşik Güvenirlik (cR) katsayıları hesaplanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular ölçeğin oldukça yüksek düzeyde iç güvenirliğe sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Ölçekte yer alan maddelerin ayırt ediciliğini sınamak için madde toplam korelasyon katsayısı (rit) ve düzeltilmiş madde korelasyon katsayısı (rir) hesaplanmıştır. Ayrıca istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark olup olmadığını belirlemek için üst ve alt %27 puan grupları arasında bağımsız gruplar t-testi yapılmıştır. Ulaşılan sonuçlar, ölçeğin ayırt edici maddelerden oluştuğunu göstermiştir.

Keywords

pedagojik liderlik, pedagoji, liderlik, okul etkililiği, okul gelişimi, ölçek uyarlama

References

• Abel, M. (2016). Why pedagogical leadership. McCormick Center for Early Childhood Leadership.
• Awang, Z. (2012). Structural equation modeling using AMOS graphic. Universiti Teknologi MARA Publication Centre (UPENA).
• Bagheri, A. ve Saadati, M. (2021). Generalized structural equations approach in the of elderly self-rated health. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1863(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1863/1/012041
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Erkan Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2020). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi. https://doi.org/10.14527/9789944919289
• Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
• Cheah, K., & Lim, A. (2022). Successful Pedagogical Leadership: Bibliometric Analysis from the Web of Science database (2017-2021). International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 140-167. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.8847
• Contreras, T. S. (2016). Pedagogical Leadership, Teaching Leadership and their Role in School Improvement: A Theoretical Approach. Propositos Y Representaciones, 4(2), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2016.v4n2.123
• Day, C., Sammons, P. ve Gorgen, K. (2020). Successful school leadership. Education Development Trust.
• Day, C., Sammons, P., Leithwood, K., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Gu, Q. and Brown, E. (2010), Ten Strong Claims about Successful School Leadership, The National College for School Leadership, Nottingham.
• DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage.
• Doll, W. J., Xia, W. ve Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MS Quarterly, 18(4), 453–461.
• ECU BLOG (2019). What does it mean to be a pedagogical leader? https://studyonline.ecu.edu.au/blog/what-does-it-mean-be-pedagogical-leader.
• Fletcher, T. D. (2022). QuantPsyc: Quantitative Psychology Tools. R package version 1.6, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=QuantPsyc
• Forza, C. ve Filippini, R. (1998). TQM impact on quality conformance and customer satisfaction: A causal model. International Journal of Production Economics, 55(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00007-3
• Greenspoon, P. J. ve Saklofske, D. H. (1998). Confirmatory factor analysis of the multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(5), 965–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00115-9
• Grosin, L. (2004). Skolklimat, prestation och anpassning i 21 mellan- och 20 högstadieskolor (Research report No. 71). Stockholm: Pedagogiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. ve Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate data analysis. Cengage.
• Hellström, L. ve Hagquist, C. (2021). School effectiveness in Sweden: psychometric properties of an instrument to measure pedagogical and social climate (PESOC) focusing on pedagogical leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 24(6), 855-875. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1623921
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. ve Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.21427/D79B73
• Hu, L. T. ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• Hultin, H., Ferrer-Wreder, L., Eichas, K., Karlberg, M., Grosin, L., & Galanti, M. R. (2016). Psychometric properties of an instrument to measure social and pedagogical school climate among teachers (PESOC). Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62, 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258661
• International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second edition). https://www.InTestCom.org
• Jacobson, S. (2011), "Leadership effects on student achievement and sustained school success", International Journal of Educational Management, 25(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541111100107
• Jorgensen, T. D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A. M. ve Rosseel, Y. (2022). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package version 0.5-6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
• Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practices of structural equation modelling. The Guilford Press. Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C. ve Morgan, G. A. (2015). IBM SPSS intermediate statistics. Routledge.
• Leithwood, K., Harris, A. ve Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School leadership & management, 40(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430701800060
• Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
• Male, T., & Palaiologou, I. (2015). Pedagogical leadership in the 21st century: Evidence from the field. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(2), 214-231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213494889
• Martinková, P. ve Drabinová, A. (2018). ShinyItemAnalysis for teaching psychometrics and to enforce routine analysis of educational tests. The R Journal, 10(2), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-074
• Miller, P. W. (2018). The nature of school leadership. Springer International Publishing.
• Mythili, N., Gulati, A., Kaur H., Luthra, S., Verma, S., Sing, C. ve Jerath, S.(2021). Pedagogical leadership: A handbook for leading learning in schools. National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration, New Delhi.
• Öztürk, N. B., Eroğlu, M. G. ve Kelecioğlu, H. (2015). Eğitim alanında yapılan ölçek uyarlama makalelerinin incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 40(178), 123-132.
• Preston, C., Goldring, E., Guthrie, J. E., Ramsey, R., & Huff, J. (2017). Conceptualizing essential components of effective high schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 16(4), 525-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2016.1205198
• R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
• Robinson, V. M., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635-674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
• Robitzsch, A. (2022). sirt: Supplementary item response theory models. R package version 3.12-66. https://cran.r-project.org/package=sirt
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
• RStudio Team. (2022). RStudio: Integrated development for R. RStudio. https://www.rstudio.com/
• Sanchez, J. E., Paul, J. M., & Thornton, B. W. (2020). Relationships among teachers’ perceptions of principal leadership and teachers’ perceptions of school climate in the high school setting. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1708471
• Sammons, P., Thomas, S. M., & Mortimore, P. (1997). Forging links: Effective schools and effective departments. Paul Chapman. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. ve Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74.
• Schumacker, R. E. ve Lomax, R. G. (2016). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Routledge.
• Segars, A. H. ve Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 17(4), 517–525. https://doi.org/10.2307/249590
• Sergiovanni, T. J. (1998). Leadership as pedagogy, capital development and school effectiveness. International Journal of Leadership in Education Theory and Practice, 1(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360312980010104
• Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017
• Suna, H. E., Tanberkan, H., Bekir, G. Ü. R., Matjaz, P. E. R. C., & Mahmut, Ö. Z. E. R. (2020). Socioeconomic status and school type as predictors of academic achievement. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, (61), 41-64. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2020-0034
• Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Clark, K., & Walpole, S. (2000). Effective schools and accomplished teachers: Lessons about primary-grade reading instruction in low-income schools. The elementary school journal, 101(2), 121-165. https://doi.org/10.1086/499662 The Swedish School Inspectorate. (2012). Principal leadership: With responsibility for pedagogical activities (No. 2012:1). Stockholm: Author.
• Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L. ve Müller, K. (2020). dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. https://cran.r-project.org/package=dplyr