Trends in Planetarium Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract

Keywords

• Planetaryum
• bibliyometrik analiz
• içerik analizi

Planetaryum Araştırmalarının Eğilimleri: Bir Bibliyometrik Analiz

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, planetaryum konusuna yönelik bilimsel yayınların profilini ortaya çıkarmaktır. Bu amaçla Web of Science Core Collection’da indekslenen planetaryum konusundaki makaleler bibliyometrik ve içerik analizi yoluyla incelenmiştir. Web of Science veri tabanından bibliyometrik analiz için 49 yayın seçilmiş iken içerik analizi için 26 yayına yer verilmiştir. Planetaryum araştırmalarının entelektüel yapısını haritalamak amacıyla bibliyometrik analiz yöntemlerinden konu haritalama, atıf ve ortak atıf analizinden faydalanılmıştır. Çalışmalarda kullanılan metodolojik eğilimler ise içerik analizi ile incelenmiştir. Çalışmadan elde edilen sonuçlara göre en etkili ülkeler ABD ve Türkiye’dir. ‘‘Planetaryum’’, ‘‘astronomi’’ ve ‘‘astronomi eğitimi’’ en çok kullanılan anahtar kelimelerdir. Trundle, K.C. ve Bell, R.L. 'nin en etkili araştırmacılar olduğu bulunmuştur. En çok atıf yapılan dergi Journal of Research in Science Teaching’dir. Makale metodolojilerinin analiz sonuçlarına göre, en çok tercih edilen araştırma yöntemi nicel araştırma yöntemidir. En çok tercih edilen örneklem grupları ilkokul ve ortaokul öğrencileridir. İncelenen makalelerde, anketlerin ve görüşmelerin kullanımına yönelik bir eğilim gözlemlenmiştir. Veri analiz yöntemi olarak en fazla içerik analizinin kullanıldığı tespit edilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın, araştırmacıların konu ile ilgili mevcut eğilimleri anlamalarına, olası araştırma boşluklarını belirlemelerine, bilimsel iş birliği ve iletişim kurmalarına yardımcı olması beklenmektedir.

Keywords

• Planetaryum
• bibliyometrik analiz
• içerik analizi

References

1. Aktoprak, A. ve Hursen, C. (2022). A bibliometric and content analysis of critical thinking in primary education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 101029.
2. Amoozegar, A., Khodabandelou, R. ve Ale Ebrahim, N. (2018). Major trends in distance education research: a combination of bibliometric and thematic analyze. International Journal of Information Research and Review, 5(2), 5352-5359.
3. Arici, F., Yildirim, P., Caliklar, Ş. ve Yilmaz, R. M. (2019). Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Computers & Education, 142, 103647.
4. Ateş, A. (2009). Planetariums. NTV Science, September, 106-115.
5. Bodur, Z., ve Yıldırım, M. (2018). The Effect of outdoor activities on academic achievement and scientific process skills of 7th students in secondary school. Journal of Educational Sciences, 47(47), 125-140.
6. Bozdoğan, A. E. ve Ustaoğlu, F. (2016). Pre-service science teachers’ views about instructional potential of planetariums. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(1), 38-49.
7. Bozdoğan, K. (2020). A Bibliometric Analysis of Educational Studies About “Museum Education. Participatory Educational Research, 7(3), 161-179.
8. Bozdoğan, A. E. (2020a). A bibliometric evaluation of published educational research papers on “planetariums” based on Web of Science Database. OPUS-International Journal of Society Researches, 16(27), 150-173. Doi: 10.26466/opus.672517

9. Bozdoğan, A. E. (2020b). A bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science Database: Articles published on science centres / museums related to educational researches. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Research, 14(31), 174-194. doi: 10.29329/mjer.2020.234.9
10. Bozdoğan, A. E., Demir, A. ve Şahinpınar, D. (2021). Bibliometric Assessment Based on Web of Science Database: Educational Research Articles on Botanic Gardens, National
11. Parks, and Natural Monuments. Participatory Educational Research, 9(1), 303-323.
12. Chen, X., Yu, G., Cheng, G. ve Hao, T. (2019). Research topics, author profiles, and collaboration networks in the top-ranked journal on educational technology over the past 40 years: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Computers in Education, 6(4), 563- 585.
13. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E. ve Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146–166.
14. Comarú, M. W., Lopes, R. M., Braga, L. A. M., Batista Mota, F. ve Galvão, C. (2021). A bibliometric and descriptive analysis of inclusive education in science education. Studies in Science Education, 57(2), 241-263.
15. Castriotta, M., Loi, M., Marku, E. ve Naitana, L. (2019). What’s in a name? Exploring the conceptual structure of emerging organizations. Scientometrics, 118(2), 407-437.
16. Creswell, J. W. ve Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
17. Calik, M. ve Sözbilir, M. (2014). Parameters of content analysis. Education and Science, 39(174).
18. Çalışkan, H. ve Çerkez, S. (2012). An Evaluation of Education with Museum Practices in Social Studies Classes Based on Student Views. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 162-173.
19. Demir, A. ve Bozdoğan, A. E. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of educational researches published on zoo and aquarium, out of school educational environments. Gazi Journal Education Sciences, 7(3), 313-333.
20. Deveci, İ. (2022). Review of entrepreneurship education literature in educational contexts: Bibliometric analysis. Participatory Educational Research, 9(1), 214-232.
21. Doğru, M., Güzeller, C. ve Çelik, M. (2019). A Bibliometric analysis in the field of sustainable development and education from past to present. Adıyaman University Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(1), 42-68.
22. Gerber, B.L., Cavallo, A.M.L. ve Marek, E.A. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 535- 549.
23. Göksu, I. (2021). Bibliometric mapping of mobile learning. Telematics and Informatics, 56, 101491.
24. Gülen, S. (2018). Determination of the effect of the planetarium activities on the students. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(2), 48-65.
25. Gülmez, D., Özteke, İ. ve Gümüş, S. (2020). Overview of educational research from turkey published in ınternational journals: A bibliometric analysis. Education and Science, 46(206).
26. Evren -Yapıcıoğlu, A. (2021). Investigation of the bibliometric features of the articles on socioscientific issues. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 17(36), 2402-2428.
27. Julia, J., Afrianti, N., Soomro, K. A., Supriyadi, T., Dolifah, D., Isrokatun, I., Erhamwilda, E. ve Ningrum, D. (2020). Flipped classroom educational model (2010-2019): A bibliometric study. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1377-1392.
28. Karasar, N. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
29. Kelly, J. (2000). Rethinking the elementary science methods course: A case for content, pedagogy, and informal science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 755-777.
30. Lee, H. Y., Chung, C. Y. ve Wei, G. (2022). Research on technological pedagogical and Content Knowledge: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2011 to 2020. In Frontiers in education, 7, 765233.
31. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı. Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
32. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2018). 2023 Eğitim vizyonu. Erişim Adresi: 11 Ekim 2022 tarihinde http://2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr/doc/2023_EGITIM_VI ZYONU.pdfadresinden erişildi.
33. Metin, M. ve Bozdoğan, A. E. (2020). The Effect of a trip organized ın planetarium on science course on academic success, ınterest and motivation of 7th year students. Gazi Journal of Education Sciences, 6(2), 240-260.
34. Petrie, K. B. (2013). Early childhood learning in preschool planetarium programs. (Unpublished Master Thesis), University of Washington, ABD.
35. Pires, F. A. L. (2008). The role of the planetarium during IYA2009, the Portuguese context. Communicating Astronomy with the Public, 498.
36. Rojas-Lamorena, Á. J., Del Barrio-García, S. ve Alcántara-Pilar, J. M. (2022). A review of three decades of academic research on brand equity: A bibliometric approach using co-word analysis and bibliographic coupling. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1067-1083.
37. Saraç, H. (2017). Researches related to outdoor learning environments in turkey: Content analysis study. Journal of Education Theory and Practical Research, 3(2), 60-81.
38. Sumners, C., Reiff, P. ve Weber, W. (2008). Learning in an immersive digital theatre. Advances in Space Research, 42(11), 1848–1854.
39. Şentürk, E. (2019). Planetaryumlar. İn A.İ. Şen (Eds.), Okul Dışı Öğrenme Ortamları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
40. Tosun, C. (2022). Bibliometric and Content Analyses of Articles Related to Science Education for Special Education Students. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69(1), 352-369.
41. Türk, C. ve Kalkan, H. (2015). The effect of planetariums on teaching specific astronomy concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24, 1-15. DOI 10.1007/s10956-014-9516-6.
42. Van Eck, N. J. ve Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053-1070.
43. Van Eck, N. J. ve Waltman, L. (2020). VOSviewer manual. https://www.vosviewer.com/getting-started
44. Van Eck, N. J. ve Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.
45. Van Nunen, K., Li, J., Reniers, G. ve Ponnet, K. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of safety culture research. Safety Science, 108, 248–258.
46. Vogel, R. ve Masal, D. (2015). Public leadership: A review of the literature and framework for future research. Public Management Review, 17(8), 1165–1189.
47. Yu, K. C., Sahami, K., Denn, G., Sahami, V. ve Sessions, L. C. (2016). Immersive planetarium visualizations for teaching solar system moon concepts to undergraduates. Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education (JAESE), 3(2), 93-110.
48. Zan, B. U. (2019). Evolution of research subjects based on direct citation, cocitation and bibliographical coupling approaches. Social Sciences Research Journal, 14(2), 501–516.
49. Zhang, B. (2017). Research on the development and change of Chinese sports science based on bibliometric analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(10), 6407-6414.
50. Zupic, I. ve Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429-472.