Hibrit Öğrenme Modeli Üzerine Bir Meta Sentez Çalışması: Uluslararası Örnekler

Şule Göksel; Abdullah Adıgüzel

doi:10.37669/milliegitim.1252931

Hibrit Öğrenme Modeli Üzerine Bir Meta Sentez Çalışması: Uluslararası Örnekler

Abstract

Bu çalışma yüz yüze eğitim ve uzaktan eğitimin birleştirilmesi anlamına gelen hibrit öğrenme modeli ile ilgili uluslararası düzeyde yapılmış ve yayınlanmış araştırmaları meta sentez yöntemi ile derinlemesine incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu meta sentez çalışmasında, çalışma alanı hibrit öğrenme modeli olarak belirlenmiştir. Daha sonra, içerik analizi yapılacak olan makalelerin araştırmaya dâhil olma ölçütleri belirlenmiştir. İncelenen makalelerin belirlenen ölçütleri yerine getirip getirmediğine araştırmacılar tarafından karar verilmiştir. Bunun sonucunda hibrit öğrenme modeli ile ilgili 2020-2022 yılları arasında “Scopus”, “Google Scholar”, “Ebscho” ve “ERIC” veri tabanlarında yayınlanmış 46 makale çalışmaya dâhil edilmiştir. Makaleler çalışmanın yayınlandığı veri tabanı, gerçekleştiği ülke ve tarih, yöntemi, amaçları ve sonuçları açısından incelenmiştir. Hibrit öğrenme modeli hakkında yazılmış makalelerin sonuçları etkileşim, motivasyon, 21. yy. becerileri, pedagojik fırsatlar, ihtiyaçlar, olumsuz yanlar ve öneriler başlıkları altında incelenmiştir. İçerik analizi sonuçlarına göre, hibrit öğrenme modelinin öğrencilere sunulan etkileşim fırsatlarını arttırdığı ve öğrencileri motive ettiği ortaya çıkmıştır. Özellikle bağımsız çalışma becerileri ve öz düzenleme olmak üzere, 21. yy. becerilerine olumlu etkileri olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Ayrıca öğrencilerin akademik çıktılarında başarılarının artması, sağladığı esneklik ve materyallere kolay erişim hibrit öğrenme modelinin sunduğu pedagojik fırsatlar başlığında öne çıkmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, hibrit öğrenme modelinin öğrenciler arasındaki sosyal etkileşimi azaltması ve teknolojide meydana gelen aksaklıklar yüzünden stres seviyesinin artması ise hibrit öğrenme modelinin olumsuz yanları olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Ayrıca, hibrit öğrenme modeline yönelik eğitim kurumları, öğrenci ve öğretmenlerin bazı ihtiyaçları olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Son olarak hibrit öğrenme modelinin olumsuz yanlarının ve ihtiyaçlarının giderilmesine yönelik makalelerde yer alan öneriler bir tema altında toplanmıştır.

Keywords

References

Adnan, M. ve Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: students' perspectives. Online Submission, 2(1), 45–51.
Akpınar, A.M. (2023). Hibrit eğitim sistemi özelinde sınıf öğretmenlerinin değişime hazır olma durumlarının incelenmesi. [Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Ordu Üniversitesi: Ordu.
Amaral, I., Santos, S. ve Simoes, R. B. (2020). Transmedia literacy and teaching strategies in the digital environment during the Covid-19 pandemic. Proceedings of ICERI, 9(10), 7077-7083
Anderson, L. and Krathwohl, D. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. Longman.
Agarwal, A. A. and Dewan, J. (2020). An analysis of effectiveness of online learning in colleges of Uttar Pradesh during the COVID-19 lockdown. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 12(5), 2957- 2963.
Aspfors, J. and Fransson, G. (2015). Research on mentor education for mentors of newly qualified teachers: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 75-86.
Bahri, A. (2018). Beyond effective teaching: enhancing students’ metacognitive skill through guided inquiry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 954(1), 1-5.
Balaman, F. (2010). Hibrit Öğrenme Modelinin Öğrencilerin Fen ve Teknoloji Dersindeki Başarılarına, Tutumlarına ve Motivasyonlarına Etkisinin İncelenmesi, [Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi], Hatay: Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Üniversitesi.

Betts, K., Hartman, K. and Oxholm, J.D. (2010). Re-examining and repositioning higher education: twenty economic and demographic factors driving online and blended program enrollments. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(1), 3-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i4.1645
Berry, G. R. (2018). Learning from the learners: student perception of the online classroom. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 19(3), 39-56.
Boelens, R., Voet, M., and Wever, B. D. (2018). The design on blended learning in respond to student diversity in higher education: Instructors’ views and use of differentiated instruction in blended learning. Computer & Education, 120, 197-212.
Boyarsky, K. (2020). What is hybrid learning? Here’s everything you need to know. Available: https://resources.owllabs.com/blog/hybrid-learning. Erişim Tarihi: 11.02.2023
Bulut, İ. (2022). Hibrit eğitim modelinin harmanlanmış eğitimle yanyana incelenmesi ve çevrimiçi eğitimdeki yeri. [Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi: Ankara.
Butz, N. T. and Stupnisky, R. H. (2016). A mixed methods study of graduate students’ self-determined motivation in synchronous hybrid learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.003.
Coffman, T. (2009). Engaging students through inquiry-oriented learning and technology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
Coll, S. D. and Coll, R. K. (2017). Using blended learning and out-of-school visits: Pedagogies for effective science teaching in the twenty-first century. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(2), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1393658
Çetin, A. ve Özdemir, Ö. F. (2018). Harmanlanmış ve yüz-yüze öğrenme ortamlarında kullanılan öğretim yöntemlerinin internete yönelik tutuma etkisi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18 (3), 1378-1403.
Çiğdemoğlu, C., Arslan, H., and Akay, H. (2011). A phenomenological study of instructors’ experiences on an open-source learning management system. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 790-795. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.144.
Çolak, Y. (2023). Hibrit öz düzenlemeli öğrenme modelinin yedinci sınıf öğrencilerinin cebir başarısına ve öz düzenleme becerilerine etkisi. [Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Atatürk Üniversitesi: Erzurum.
Daradkeh, Y. I. and Kukharenko, V. (2016). Open online course for prepare world teachers. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 4(5), 59-62.
Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E. and Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332 (6034), 862–864.
Dewitt-Brink, D. and Rhodes, S. C. (1992). Listening instruction: A qualitative meta-analysis of twenty- four selected studies. Clearinghouse.
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online Learning: A panacea in the Time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hype. E-Learning, 54.
Dzubian, C., Hartman, J. and Mahaffy, G. L. (2014). Blending it all together. In A.G. Picciano, C. D. Dziuban ve Graham, C. R. (Eds.). Blended learning: Research perspective (pp. 325-337). Routledge.
Eija, N., Sari, P,S., Kristina, M., Tiina, T., Jonna, J. and Heli-Maria, K. (2024). The experiences of health sciences students with hybrid learning in health sciences education-A qualitative study. Nurse Educ Today. 132. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106017.
Eitrich, T., Frings, W., and Lang, B. (2006). HyParSVM: A New Hybrid Parallel Software for Support Vector Machine Learning on SMP Clusters. European Conference on Parallel Processing, 4128, 350-359.
Er, B. G. (2023). Evaluation of a foreign languages school hybrid program in Turkey through Stake’s responsive evaluation model: A mixed method study. [Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi]. Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi: Ankara.
Essa, E. K. (2023). The effectiveness of hybrid learning in enhancing academic mindfulness and deeper learning of university students. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 9(1), 188-202. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3081.
Erdoğan, M. (2023). Fen Bilimleri dersi madde döngüleri ve çevre sorunları konusunun öğretiminde kullanılan hibrit öğrenme uygulamalarının bazı değişkenler üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi. [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Yedi Aralık Üniversitesi: Kilis.
Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A Framework for research and practice. Routledge.
Garrison, D.R. and Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Garrison, D.R. and Vaughan, N.D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.
Gonzales, A.L., McCrory C, J. and Lynch, T. (2018). Technology problems and student achievement gaps: A validation and extension of the technology maintenance construct. Communication Research, 47(5), 750-770.
Graham, C. (2004). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In Bonk, C. J. ve Graham, C. R. (Eds.). Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs (pp.3-21). Pfeiffer Publishing.
Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. Handbook of Distance Education, 3, 333–350.
Hughes, G. (2007). Using blended learning to increase learner support and improve retention. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 349-363. 10.1080/13562510701278690.
Jamison, A., Kolmos, A. and Holgaard, J. E. (2014). Hybrid learning: An integrative approach to engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 253-273.
Johnson, E., Morwane, R., Dada, S., Pretorius, G. and Lotriet, M. (2018). Adult learners’ perspectives on their engagement in a hybrid learning postgraduate Programme. The Journal of Continuing High Education, 66(2), 88-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2018.1469071
Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23,1-13. 10.3402/rlt.v23.26507
Kitsantas, A. (2013). Fostering college students' self-regulated learning with learning technologies. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 10, 235-252.
Kurthen, H. and Smith, G. G. (2006). Hybrid online face-to-face teaching: When is it an efficient learning tool? The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review, 12(5), 237–246.
Kürtüncü, M. ve Kurt, A. (2020). Covid-19 pandemisi döneminde hemşirelik öğrencilerinin uzaktan eğitim konusunda yaşadıkları sorunlar. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(5), 66-77.
Li, K.C., Wong, B.T.M., Kwan, R., Chan, H.T., Wu, M.M.F. and Cheung, S.K.S. (2023). Evaluation of Hybrid Learning and Teaching Practices: The Perspective of Academics. Sustainability, 15, 6780. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su15086780
Luo, T., Sickel, J. and Cheng, L. (2017). PSTs’ participation and perceptions of twitter live chats as personal learning networks. TechTrends, 61, 226–235.
Maity, C. and Mukherjee, M. (2021). Hybrid model of learning: A flexible combination of in-person and remote environment. Education Matters, 24-29.
Margulieux, L. E., McCracken, W. M. and Catrambone, R. (2015). Mixing in- class and online learning: Content meta-analysis of outcomes for hybrid, blended, and flipped courses. In O. Lindwall, P. Hakkinen, T. Koschmann, P. Tchounikine, ve S. Ludvigsen (Eds.), Exploring the material conditions of learning: The computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 220-227).The International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Marinoni, G., Van’t Land, H. and Jensen, T. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on higher education around the world. IAU Global Survey Report, 23, 1-17. Murray, M., Pérez, J., Geist, D. and Hedrick, A. (2012). Student interaction with online course content: Build it and they might come. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11, 125-140.
Musawi, A. S. A. (2011). Blended learning. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8(2), 3-8.
Nagaeva, I. A. (2016). Blended learning in the modern educational process: The need and opportunities. Domestic and Foreign Pedagogy, 6, 56–67.
Nørgård, R. T. (2021). Theorising hybrid lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology.
O'Byrne, W. I. and Pytash, K. E. (2015). Hybrid and blended learning: Modifying pedagogy across path, pace, time, and place. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 59(2), 137-140.
Ocak, M.A. (2011). Why are faculty members not teaching blended courses? Insights from faculty members. Computers & Education, 56, 689-699.
O’ Shea, S., Stone, C. and Delahunty, J. (2015). I ‘feel’ like I am at university even though I am online. Exploring how students narrate their engagement with higher education institutions in an online learning environment. Distance Education, 36(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1019970
Pandey, H. and Pande, P. (2014). Video conferencing: An efficient e-learning tool for distance education. International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research, 10(2), 308-314.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme Yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi.
PennState. (2020). What Is Hybrid Learning? Available: https://sites.psu.edu/hybridlearning/what-is- hybrid/. Erişim tarihi: 12.02.2023 Polat, S. ve Ay, O. (2016). Meta-sentez: Kavramsal bir çözümleme. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(1), 52-64.
Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I. and Depaepe, F. (2020). A Systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: Gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23(3), 269-290.
Rahardjanto, A. (2019). Hybrid-PjBL: Learning outcomes, creative thinking skills, and learning motivation of preservice teacher. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 179-192.
Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. McGraw- Hill-Professional. Salmon, G. (2011). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (Üçüncü Basım). Routledge.
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S. and Zvacek, S. (2015). Teaching and learning at a distance. Foundations of distance education (Altıncı Basım). Information Age Publishing.
Shea, P. and Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster epistemic engagement and cognitive presence in online education. Computers and Education, 52(3), 543–553.
Smaldino, E, S., Lowther, D, L., Mims, C. and Russel, J, D. (2015). Instructional technology and media for learning (Onbirinci Basım). Pearson.
Smith, L. C., Lastraand, S. and Robins, J. (2001). Teaching online: Changing models of teaching and learning in LEEP. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 42(4), 348- 363.
Snart, J. A. (2010). Hybrid Learning: The Perils and Promise of Blending Online and Face-to-Face Instruction in Higher Education. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger.
Song, L., Singleton, E.S., Hill. J.R. and Koh, M.H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet Higher Education, 7, 59-70.
Stewart, M., Stott, T. and Nuttall, A. M. (2011). Student engagement patterns over the duration of level 1 and level 3 geography modules: Influences on student attendance, performance and use of online resources. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(1), 47-65.
Suwantarathip, O. (2019). Predictors of students’ satisfaction with a hybrid English course. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), 115-130. https://doi:10.17718/tojde. 522427
Thomas, J. and Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(45), 1-10.
Uşun, S. (2006). Uzaktan eğitim. (1.Baskı). Nobel Yayınları.
Var, D. (2023). Milli Savunma Üniversitesinde hibrit eğitim sistemine geçiş için yeni nesil öğrenme teknolojileri ile tasarlanmış sınıf modeli. [Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. Milli Savunma Üniversitesi: İstanbul.
Voytovich, K. (2013). Hybrid education while teaching foreign languages at university. Herald of Vyatka State University, 2(3), 76-79.
Walsh, D. and Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A Literature review. Methodological Issues in Nursing Research, 50(2), 204-211. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2648.2005.03380.x.
Waseem, M. (2021). An analytical study of hybrid learning experiences of secondary schools students of southern Punjab during COVID-19. [Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi]. Punjab University: India.
Yates, A., Strakey, L., Egerton, B. ve Flueggen, F. (2020). High school student experience of online learning during Covid-19: The influence of technology and pedagogy, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 59-73. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2020.1854337
Yeh, Y. (2010). Integrating collaborative PBL with blended learning to explore preservice teachers’ development of online learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1630– 1640.
Yoon, C., Thomas, M. O. and Dreyfus, T. (2011). Gestures and insight in advanced mathematical thinking. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(7), 891-901.
Yu,Y. T. ,Choy, M. Y., Chan, E. Y. K. and Lo, Y. T.(2008). A hybrid learning course on software development: Requirements validation of tool support. International Conference on Hybrid Learning and Education, 5169, 316-327.
Zhang, J. H., Zou, L., Miao, J., Zhang, Y-X., Hwang, G-J. and Zhu, Y. (2019). An individualized intervention approach to improving university students’ learning performance and interactive behaviors in a blended learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(2) 231- 245. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636078
Meta Sentezde Kullanılan Makaleler Kaynakça
Amin, S., Sumarmi, Bachri, S., Susilo, S. and Bashith, A. (2020). The effect of problem-based hybrid learning (PBHL) models on spatial thinking ability and geography learning outcomes. iJET, 15(19), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i19.15729
Aristika, A. and Juandi, D. (2021). The effectiveness of hybrid learning in improving of teacher-student relationship in terms of learning motivation. Emerging Science Journal, 5(4), 443-456.
Ayhan, D. and Seki, Ö. H. (2021). Effect of assertiveness training on the nursing students' assertiveness and self-esteem levels: Application of hybrid education in COVID-19 pandemic. Nurs Forum, 56(4), 807-815. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12610.
Baker, D. M. A., Unni, R., Kerr-Sims, S. and Marquis, G. (2020). Understanding factors that influence attitude and preference for hybrid course formats. e-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching,14(1), 174-188.
Carlson, C., Keiper, M., White, A. and Lupinek, J. (2020). Student perceptions on the benefits of Flipgrid in a HyFlex learning environment. The Journal of Education for Business, 96(6), 343-351. 10.1080/08832323.2020.1832431.
Cheng, H., Esmonde-White, C., Kassay, A. D., Wunder, M. L. and Martin, C. (2021). Developing a hybrid four-prong approach to anatomical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Medical Science Educator, 31(4), 1529-1535.
Chowdhury, M., Demir, I., Jiang, J., and Shahzad, N. (2021). Will high school students after the pandemic want a system of education to be a hybrid of remote learning and in person learning?. Across The Spectrum of Socioeconomics, 4(252), 1-21.
Elkhatat, A. M. and Al-Muhtaseb, S. A. (2021). Hybrid online-flipped learning pedagogy for teaching laboratory courses to mitigate the pandemic COVID-19 confinement and enable effective sustainable delivery: investigation of attaining course learning outcome. SN Social Sciences, 1(5), 113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00117-6
Elmasarawy, E. (2022). Female students’ attitudes at faculty of physical education towards the use of hybrid learning to study the gymnastics course under Covid-19 pandemic. The International Scientific Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 10(1), 47-61. doi:10.21608/isjpes.2021.96338.1066
Fawns, T., Markauskaite, L., Carvalho, L. ve Goodyear, P. (2021). H2m pedagogy: designing for hybrid learning in medical education. In E. Gil, Y. Mor, Y. Dimitriadis, ve C. Köppe (Eds). Hybrid learning spaces. Cham: Springer.
Fithriani, R. and Alharbi, M. A. (2021). The adoption of Edmodo in a hybrid EFL writing class: What do Indonesian students and lecturers say? Asian EFL Journal Research Articles, 28(2), 38-60.
Fitriyana, N., Wiyarsi, A., Sugiyarto, K. H. and Ikhsan, J. (2021). The influences of hybrid learning with video conference and “chemondro-game” on students’ self-efficacy, self-regulated learning, and achievement toward chemistry. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(2), 233-248. DOI no: 10.36681/tused.2021.62
Green, J.K. (2022). Designing hybrid spaces for learning in higher education health contexts. Postdigit Sci Educ 4, 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00268-y
Gupta, R. (2020). Hybrid-Flipped class room approach for fashion design students: Mitigating impacts to learning activities due to emergence of COVID-19. In 1th International Conference on Computing, Communicaiton and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT). IEEE.
Handayani, Y. S. and Sulastri, A. (2022). Teacher resilience facing technostress in the implementation of synchronous hybrid learning in elementary school. In Interdisciplinary Conference of Psychology, Health, and Social Science (ICPHS 2021) (pp. 170-181). Atlantis Press.
Haslam, A., Love, C., Taniguchi, T., Williams, M. B., Wetherill, M. S., Sisson, S., Weedn, A. E., Jacob, T. and Blue Bird Jernigan, V. (2022). Development and implementation of a hybrid online and in-person food sovereignty and nutrition education curriculum for native American parents: The FRESH study. Health Education & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981211067168
Heiman, A. (2021). Increasing reading comprehension and student engagement in hybrid learning Environments. [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Catholic Universtiy of America, the USA.
Karim, M. A. (2021). Hybrid and online synchronous delivery of environmental engineering during COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative study on perception, attitude, and assessment. European Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 05. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/9688
Klonowska, K., Chen, E. Z., Kjellstrand, I., Kallstörm, L. and Siljeklint, P. (2020, 1-2 Temmuz). Students engagement in hybrid taught large introduction courses during COVID-19 (Sözlü Bildiri). Future of Education Conference, Kristianstad University, Sweden.
Kolova, S. M. and Belkina, O. V. (2021). Hybrid Project-based learning in Engineering education. In 2021 International Conference on Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies (IT&QM&IS) (pp. 803-807). IEEE.
Li, Q., Li, Z. and Han, J. (2021). A hybrid learning pedagogy for surmounting the challenges of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the performing arts education. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 7635–7655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10612-1
Ma’Ruf, M., Handayani, Y., Marisda, D. H. and Riskawati, R. (2020). The needs analysis of basic physics learning devices based on hybrid learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1422 (1), 12-29.
Maesaroh, S. and Masyitoh, I. S. (2021). Hybrid learning in civic education during pandemic Covid 19 in international schools. Education and humanities research, 636, 434-440.
Mumford, S. and Dikilitaş, K. (2020). Pre-service language teachers’ reflection development through online interaction in a hybrid learning course. Computers & Education, 144, 1-13.
Munguía, M. F., Novo, O. A. and Castro, J. F. (2021). Hybrid learning: Just a previous step to go back to ordinary face-to-face sessions or an opportunity to go further on education by a hybrid pedagogical model. 13th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (Sözlü Bildiri). Universidad Panamericana, Mexico. DOI: 10.21125/edulearn.2021.1711
Nadjamuddin, L., Amus, S., Jamaludin, J., Usman, S., Rore, A. I., Tadeko, N. and Zaky, M. (2022). Development of hybrid discovery learning (HDL) model for integrated social studies learning. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 28, 253-262.
Naseer, S., Zulfikar, I., Zaheer, F., Butt, F., Sagheer, S. and Kazım, E. (2021). Perception of MBBS students on hybrid teaching in Covid-19 era: A survey of public sector medical university. Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 15(12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs2115123154
Nasution, E., Rhamyanti, Y., Lubis, R., Harahap, D., Harahap, A., Sara, Y. and Sikumbang, R. (2022). The influence of the hybrid learning model using the schoology application in basic physics lectures to improve process skills in the industrial 4.0 period. In The 1st International Conference Science Physics and Education 2021 (ICSPE 2021). IOP Publishing. 10.1088/1742-6596/2165/1/012005.
Natto, Z., & Alsharif, A., Alsharif, B., Alsharif, L., & Althagafi, N. and Kassim, S. (2021). Effectiveness of WhatsApp as a part of a hybrid learning environment: An opportunity for post-COVID-19 pandemic pedagogy. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 21, 1331-1336. 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2978.
Potra,S., Pugna,A., Pop, M. D., Negrea, R. and Dungan, L. (2021). Facing COVID-19 Challenges: 1st-year students’ experience with the Romanian hybrid higher educational system. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18(6), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph 18063058
Purahong, B., Sithiyopasakul, S., Sithiyopasakul, P., Anuwongpinit, T. Archevapanich, T. and Vichaiya, P. (2021). Hybrid learning during the COVID-19 pandemic of engineering students at KMITL, Thailand. In International STEM Education Conference (iSTEM-Ed) (pp. 1-4). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ISTEM-ED52129.2021.9625090
Raes, A. (2022). Exploring student and teacher experineces in hybrid learning environments: Does presence matter?. Postdigit Sci Educ, 4, 138-159. https://dio.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00274-0
Rodrigo, R. and Platon, L. (2022). Hybrid learning for the digital natives: Impacts on academic performance and learning approaches. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. 43(1), 201-208. 10.34044/j.kjss.2022.43.1.27.
Romero-Hall, E. and Ripine, C. (2021). Hybrid flexible instruction: Exploring faculty preparedness. Online Learning, 25(3), 289-312. doi: 10.24059/olj.v25i3.2426
Rukayah, R., Andayani, A. and Syawaludin, A. (2022). Learner’s needs of interactive multimedia based on hybrid learning for TISOL program. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(1), 619-632. Doi: 10.52462/jlls.207
Sanpanich, N. (2021). Investigating factors affecting students’ attitudes toward hybrid learning. Reflections, 28(2), 208-227.
Santos, S., Amaral, I. and Siomes, R. B. (2021). Not one thing nor the other: Evaluating a hybrid model in higher education classes in Portugal during Covid-19 (Sözlü Bildiri). Proceedings Of INTED2021 Conference, University Coumbria, Portugal.
Shimkovich, E. D., Makhmutova, G. F., Ivanova,D. A. and Urunova, R. D. (2021). Advantages and disadvantages of hybrid learning for international students. Proceedings IFTE, 1533-1544. doi:10.3897/ap.5.e1533
Suematsu, M., Okumura, K., Hida, T., Takahshi, N., Okazaki, K., Fuchita, E., Abe, K., KAmei, H. and Hanya, M. (2021). Students' perception of a hybrid interprofessional education course in a clinical diabetes setting: a qualitative study. International Journal of Medical Education, 12, 195-204. DOI: 10.5116/ijme.6165.59e0
Sukiman, S. H. and Puspo, R. (2022). The pattern of hybrid learning to maintain learning effectiveness at the higher education level post-COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.243
Sumandiyar, A., Husain, M.N., Sumule G, M., Nada, I. and Fachruddin, S. (2021). The effectiveness of hybrid learning as instructional media amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 5(3), 651-664. doi: 10.25139/jsk.v5i3.3850
Tian, T. (2021). Hybrid teaching of introductory programming during the COVID- 19 pandemic – A case study. Inter. J. Acad. Res. Educ. Rev, 9(7), 297-303
Thamrin, T., Saidun, H., Aditia, R. and Putri, F. R. (2022). The effectiveness of the hybrid learning materials with the application of problem-based learning model (Hybrid-PBL) to improve learning outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 3(1), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v3i1.178
Tusino, Sukarni, S. and Rokhayati, T. (2021). Hybrid synchronous and asynchronous language learning in writing class : The learners’ psychosocial perspectives in Indonesia. The educational review. DOI: 10.15804/tner.2021.65.3.15
Yang, Z. and Spitzer, L. (2020). A case for hybrid learning: Using a hybrid model to teach advanced academic reading. ORTESOL Journal, 37, 11-22.
Zahra, R. and Sheshasaayee, A. (2021). Challenges identified for the efficient implementation of the hybrid e-learning model during COVID-19 (Sözlü Bildiri). IEEE International Conference on Mobile Networks and Wireless Communications. DOI: 10.1109/ICMNWC52512.2021.9688533

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Instructional Technologies

Journal Section

Review

Authors

Şule Göksel ^*
0000-0003-4673-9356
Türkiye

Abdullah Adıgüzel
0000-0001-7184-3644
Türkiye

Publication Date

August 1, 2024

Submission Date

February 18, 2023

Acceptance Date

May 30, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 53 Number: 243

DOI

https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1252931

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA65UD84ZD

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Göksel, Ş., & Adıgüzel, A. (2024). Hibrit Öğrenme Modeli Üzerine Bir Meta Sentez Çalışması: Uluslararası Örnekler. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 53(243), 1655-1698. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1252931

AMA

1.Göksel Ş, Adıgüzel A. Hibrit Öğrenme Modeli Üzerine Bir Meta Sentez Çalışması: Uluslararası Örnekler. Milli Eğitim Dergisi. 2024;53(243):1655-1698. doi:10.37669/milliegitim.1252931

Chicago

Göksel, Şule, and Abdullah Adıgüzel. 2024. “Hibrit Öğrenme Modeli Üzerine Bir Meta Sentez Çalışması: Uluslararası Örnekler”. Milli Eğitim Dergisi 53 (243): 1655-98. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1252931.

EndNote

Göksel Ş, Adıgüzel A (August 1, 2024) Hibrit Öğrenme Modeli Üzerine Bir Meta Sentez Çalışması: Uluslararası Örnekler. Milli Eğitim Dergisi 53 243 1655–1698.

IEEE

[1]Ş. Göksel and A. Adıgüzel, “Hibrit Öğrenme Modeli Üzerine Bir Meta Sentez Çalışması: Uluslararası Örnekler”, Milli Eğitim Dergisi, vol. 53, no. 243, pp. 1655–1698, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.37669/milliegitim.1252931.

ISNAD

Göksel, Şule - Adıgüzel, Abdullah. “Hibrit Öğrenme Modeli Üzerine Bir Meta Sentez Çalışması: Uluslararası Örnekler”. Milli Eğitim Dergisi 53/243 (August 1, 2024): 1655-1698. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1252931.

JAMA

1.Göksel Ş, Adıgüzel A. Hibrit Öğrenme Modeli Üzerine Bir Meta Sentez Çalışması: Uluslararası Örnekler. Milli Eğitim Dergisi. 2024;53:1655–1698.

MLA

Göksel, Şule, and Abdullah Adıgüzel. “Hibrit Öğrenme Modeli Üzerine Bir Meta Sentez Çalışması: Uluslararası Örnekler”. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, vol. 53, no. 243, Aug. 2024, pp. 1655-98, doi:10.37669/milliegitim.1252931.

Vancouver

1.Şule Göksel, Abdullah Adıgüzel. Hibrit Öğrenme Modeli Üzerine Bir Meta Sentez Çalışması: Uluslararası Örnekler. Milli Eğitim Dergisi. 2024 Aug. 1;53(243):1655-98. doi:10.37669/milliegitim.1252931

Cited By

Öğretmenlerin Hibrit Tabanlı Öğrenme Algısı Ölçeği

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1528721

Determining the Role of Artificial Intelligence-Supported Applications in Reliability of Measurement Activities: Awareness and Precautions

Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.1565847