OKUL GELİŞİMİ BAĞLAMINDA DENETİM UYGULAMALARI: OFSTED ÖRNEĞİ

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, İngiltere’de bağımsız bir hükümet kurumu olan ve eğitim alanında Avrupa’da en önemli ve etkili denetim organizasyonlarından biri olan Ofsted’in (The Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills) denetim uygulamaları ile bu uygulamaların okul gelişimini nasıl etkilediği incelenmiştir. Çalışmada nitel araştırma yaklaşımına uygun olarak doküman inceleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bu kapsamda, elde edilen bulgular iki ana başlıkta sunulmuştur. Bunlar; (i) Ofsted’in kurumsal yapısı, temel denetim uygulamaları ve süreçleri, (ii) Ofsted denetimlerinin okul gelişimine etkileridir. Çalışmada elde edilen bulgular doğrultusunda; Ofsted’in iyi örnek teşkil edecek denetim uygulamalarına sahip olduğu, bağımsız statüsü ve kurumsal yapısıyla okul değerlendirme süreçlerinde gücünü ve etkisini koruduğu; Ofsted denetimlerinin ulusal stratejiler ve standartlara erişime yardımcı olabildiği, öğretmenlerin sınıf içi uygulamalarını, yöntem ve tekniklerini değiştirmesinde etkili olabildiği ve öğrencilerin başarılarının artışına katkı sağlayabildiği; buna karşın okullar üzerindeki stres ve baskıyı artırabileceği ve uzun vadede okul gelişimi bağlamında olumlu etkilerine ilişkin yeterli kanıtların bulunmadığı görülmüştür.

Keywords

• Ofsted,okul denetimi,okul gelişimi

References

1. AĞAOĞLU, E. (2010). Okul Yöneticilerinin Denetim ve Değerlendirme Rolü. Servet Özdemir (Ed.), Türk Eğitim Sistemi ve Okul Yönetimi içinde (s. 193-207). Ankara: Pegem Yayınevi.
2. AINSCOW, M., BERESFORD, J., HARRIS, A., HOPKINS; D., SOUTHWORTH, G. ve WEST, M. (2000). Creating the Conditions for School Improvement. David Fulton Publishers: London.
3. ALLEN, R. ve BURGESS, S. (2012). How Should We Treat Under-Performing Schools? A Regression Discontinuity Analysis of School Inspections in England. Bristol: CMPO. AVAM KAMARASI EĞİTİM VE İSTİHDAM KOMİTESİ (House Of Commons Select Committee On Education And Employment). (1999). The Work of Ofsted. London: House of Commons.
4. AYDIN, İ. (2013). Öğretimde Denetim: Durum Saptama Değerlendirme ve Geliştirme. Ankara: PEGEM Akademi.
5. BELFIELD, C. ve SIBIETA, L. (2016). Long-run trends in school spending in England. (Rapor No:R115). IFS Report, London.
6. BROWN, M., RUTHERFORD, D. ve BOYLE, B. (2000). Leadership for School Improvement: The Role of The Head of Department in UK Secondary Schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(2), 237–258.
7. BUYRUK, H. (2018). Eğitimde Kamu-Özel Ortaklığı: İngiltere’de Akademi Okulları Örneği. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt 51, Sayı 1, 101-131. CERI-Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. (1995). Schools Under Scrutiny. Paris: OECD.
8. CHAPMAN, C. (2000). Improvement, Inspection and Self-Review. Improving Schools, 3(2), 57-63

9. CHAPMAN, C. (2001). Changing Classrooms Through Inspection. School Leadership and Management, 21(1), 59–73.
10. CHAPMAN, C. (2002). Ofsted and School Improvement: Teachers’ Perceptions of The Inspection Process in Schools Facing Challenging Circumstances. School Leadership & Management, 22(3), 257-272.
11. CUCKLE, P. ve BROADHEAD, P. (1999). Effects of OFSTED Inspection on School Development and Staff Morale. Cullingford, C. (Ed), An Inspector Calls-OfSTED and Its Effect on School Standarts içinde. London: Kogan Page.
12. EHREN, M.C.M., ALTRICHTER, H., MCNAMARA, G. ve O’HARA, J. (2013). Impact of School Inspections on Improvement of Schools-Describing Assumptions on Okul Gelişimi Bağlamında Denetim Uygulamaları: Ofsted Örneği Causal Mechanisms in Six European Countries. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 25(1), 3-43.
13. EHREN, M.C.M. ve VISSCHER, A. J. (2006). Towards a Theory on the Impact of School Inspections. British Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 54, No.1, 51–72.
14. EHREN, M.C.M. ve VISSCHER, A. J. (2008). The Relationship Between School Inspections, School Characteristics and School Improvement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(2), 205–227.
15. ELMORE, R. F. ve FUHRMAN, S. H. (2001). Research Finds The False Assumption of Accountability. The Education Digest, 67(4), 9–14.
16. EURYDICE-Avrupa Eğitim Bilgi Ağı- (2007). The Information Database on Education System in Europe: Finland. Brussels: European Commission.
17. FITZ-GIBBON, C.T. (1996) Monitoring Education: Indicators, Quality and Effectiveness. London: Cassell.
18. FULLAN, M. (1992). Successful School Improvement. Buckingham: Open University Press.
19. GRAY, J. ve WILCOX, B. (1995). Good School, Bad School: Evaluating Performance and Encouraging Improvement. Buckingham: Open University Press.
20. GRAY, C. ve GARDNER, J. (1999). The Impact of School Inspections. Oxford Review of Education, 25(4), 455–469.
21. HARRIS, A. (2000). What Works in School İmprovement? Lessons From The Field and Future Directions. Educational Research, 42(1), 1-11.
22. HARRIS, A. (2013). School Improvement: What’s in it for Schools?. London:Routledge.
23. HOPKINS, D. (1996). Towards A Theory For School Improvement. J. Gray, D. Reynolds, C. Fitz-Gibbon (Eds), Merging Traditions: The Future of Research on School Effectiveness and School Improvement içinde (s. 30-50). London: Cassell.
24. HOPKINS, D. ve HARRIS, A. (1997). Improving the Quality of Education For All. Support for Learning, 12(4), 147–51.
25. HUTCHINSON, J. (2016). School Inspection in England: Is There Room To Improve?. London: Education Policy Institute.
26. JONES, K. ve TYMMS, P. (2014). Ofsted’s Role in Promoting School Improvement:The Mechanisms of The School Inspection System in England. Oxford Review of Education, 40(3), 315-330.
27. KLERKS, M. (2012). The effect of school inspections: a systematic review. http://janbri.nl/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/ORD-paper-2012-Review-Effect-School-Inspections-MKLERKS.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 14.01.2019).
28. KOGAN, M. and MADEN, M. (1999) An Evaluation of Evaluators: The OFSTED System of School Inspection. C. Cullıngford (Ed.) An Inspector Calls; Ofsted and its Effect on School Standards içinde (s.9-32). London: Kogan Page).
29. LANDWEHR, N. (2011). Thesen zur Wirkung und Wirksamkeit der externen Schulevaluation [Theses on The Impact and Effectiveness of The External Evaluation of Schools]. C. Quesel, V. Husfeldt, N. Landwehr, ve N. Steiner (Eds.), Wirkungen und Wirksamkeit der externen Schulevaluation içinde (s. 35–70). Bern: Switzerland.
30. LONSDALE, P. ve PARSONS, C. (1998). Inspection and The School Improvement Hoax. Earley, P (ed.), School Improvement After Inspection içinde (s.110). London: Sage.
31. LOWE, G. C. (2003). Inspection, School İmprovement, Development and Change. (Doktora Tezi). Sheffield Hallam University.
32. MATTHEWS, P. ve SAMMONS, P. (2004). Improvement through inspection: an evaluation of the impact of Ofsted’s work. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/4969/3/3696.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 10.04.2019).
33. MATTHEWS, P. ve SMITH, G. (1995). OFSTED: Inspecting Schools and Improvement Through Inspection. Cambridge Journal of Education, 25(1), 23-34.
34. NAO-National Audit Office. (2018). Ofsted’s inspection of schools (Rapor No: HC 1004). London: National Audit Office. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Ofsteds-inspection-of-schools.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 04.02.2019).
35. NICHOLS, S. L., GLASS, G. V. ve BERLINER, D. C. (2006). High-Stakes Testing And Student Achievement: Does Accountability Pressure Increase Student Learning? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(1) 1-172.
36. OFSTED. (1993). The annual report of her majesty’s chief ınspector for schools. London: HMSO.
37. OFSTED. (1994). A Focus on Quality. London: OFSTED.
38. OFSTED. (2014). How Ofsted inspects maintained schools and academies. https://www. gov.uk/guidance/being-inspected-as-a-maintained-school-or-academy (Erişim tarihi: 08.02.2019).
39. OFSTED. (2017a). Ofsted strategy 2017-22. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/ government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/648212/Ofsted_strategy_2017-22.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 03.02.2019).
40. OFSTED. (2017b). Ofsted’s corporate governance framework. https://assets.publishing. service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ file/581553/Ofsteds_corporate_governance_framework.pdf (Erişim tarihi:03.02.2019). OFSTED. (2019a). The education inspection framework. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ file/801429/Education_inspection_framework.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 06.02.2020).
41. OFSTED. (2019b). School inspections a guide for parents. https://assets.publishing. service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ file/828451/School_inspections_-_a_guide_for_parents.pdf (Erişim tarihi:n08.02.2020).
42. OFSTED. (2019c). School inspection handbook. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/ government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843108/School_inspection_handbook_-_section_5.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 08.02.2020).
43. OFSTED. (2020). Her majesty’s inspector job specification. http://www.ofstedhmi.co.uk/ media/4046/hmi-schools-job-specification.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 08.02.2020).
44. OFSTED. (t.y.). About us. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted/ about (Erişim tarihi: 10.02.2020).
45. OFSTED. (t.y.). Complaints procedure. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted/about/complaints-procedure (Erişim tarihi: 10.02.2020).
46. ROBERTS, N. (2018). School inspections in England: Ofsted (Rapor No: 07091). London: House of Commons Library. http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN07091/SN07091.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 04.02.2019).
47. ROSENTHAL, L. (2004). Do School Inspections Improve School Quality? Ofsted Inspections and School Examination Results in The UK. Economics of Education Review, 23(2), 143–151.
48. SHAW, I., NEWTON, D. P., AITKIN, M. ve DARNELL, R. (2003). Do Ofsted Inspections of Secondary Schools Make A Difference To GCSE Results?. British Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 63-75.
49. SICI-Standing International Conference of Inspectorates (2009). The inspectorate of England. http://www.sici-inspectorates.eu/getattachment/a8732d7f-cb1e-489ab501-f5a85ad66743 (Erişim tarihi: 04.02.2019).
50. SNELLING, G. (2002). OFSTED Inspections: Do They Promote Improvement in Teaching Quality? (Doktora Tezi). University of Leicester.
51. ŞAHİN, İ. (2013). İlköğretim Okul Müdürlerinin Okul Geliştirme Stratejileri ve Uygulamalarına İlişkin Görüşleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(1), 229- 250.
52. TEDDLIE, C. ve REYNOLDS, R. (2000). The International Handbook of School Effectiveness Research, London: Falmer.
53. TURAN, S. (2007). Gelişen Ağ Toplumunda Eğitim Yöneticilerinin Teknolojik Liderliği. Eğitime Bakış Dergisi, 3(9), 5-8.
54. WIEBES, F. (1998) Van Buiten naar binnen; waardevolle ideeën van buitenstaanders. [From outside to inside; valuable ideas of outsiders] (The Hague, Delwel Uitgeverij B.V.).
55. VAN VELZEN, W.G., MILES, M.B., EKHOLM, M., HAMAYER, U. ve ROBIN, D.(1985). Making school improvement work: a conceptual guide to practice. ACCO Pub. Belgium.
56. YURDAKUL, A. ve TOK, T.N. (2017). Maarif Müfettişlerinin Görev Alanlarına İlişkin Görüşleri. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(2), 5008-5019.
57. ZEPEDA, S. J. (2013). Instructional leadership for school improvement. Routledge.