Terasem Trans-Religion as an Example of Religious Transhumanism

Yıl 2022, , 555 - 574, 31.12.2022

Büşra Yeşilyurt , Muhammet Yeşilyurt

https://doi.org/10.47502/mizan.1184892

Öz

Terasem is a religious transhumanist movement that progresses in different ways to the goals and ideals of Transhumanism, a techno-religious movement whose name has begun to be heard in recent years, and evaluates this progress from ethical, legal and especially religious perspectives. Terasem, who sees vitality as consisting of brain activities, argues that immortality can be achieved by copying brain functions and experiences into a new human-machine combination that can function similarly to the brain or by copying them completely into a machine. Terasem, who ignores the soul by seeing man as consisting of the worldly experiences of the mind and the mind, cannot provide a satisfactory explanation as to the extent to which the delusion that a machine loaded with the experience, experience and even feelings of a human being immortalizes him by continuing to keep that person alive can be considered as life, but he aims to support his goals and ideals with his own religious movement, which he defines as Trans-religion. Defining the word trans not as a transition or transformation, but as transcendence, Terasem claims to transcend, not exclude, those who believe in God. Terasem draws a profile of a conciliatory or syncretic religious movement by offering its followers the freedom to believe and practice another religion. This study is to consider and evaluate the Terasem Movement from the perspective of the History of Religions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Transhumanism, Techno-religion, Terasem Movement, Terasem Trans-Religion, Mind files

Dini Transhümanizmin Bir Örneği Olarak "Terasem Trans-Dini"

Öz

Terasem, transhümanizmin insanı dönüştürme ideallerine etik, hukuki ve dini bağlamında yaklaşan hem tekno-fütürist hem de dini transhümanist bir harekettir. İnsan olmayı dünyevi tecrübeler ve anılardan ibaret gören Terasem, ölümsüzlüğün bu deneyim ve bilgilerin kaydedilmesi ve beyinle benzer bir şekilde işlenebilmesi ile mümkün olacağını iddia etmektedir. Ruhu yok sayarak bir insana ait yaşanmışlıkların ve dünyevi tecrübelerin dijital bir kopyasının makineler veya biyo-mekanik varlıklara yüklenmesinin insanı yaşatmaya devam edeceği ve onu ölümsüzleştirdiği düşüncesi başlı başına bir tartışma konusudur. Bununla birlikte Terasem, mevcut dinleri kendi amaç ve ideallerinin gerçekleştirilebilmesini sağlayacak bilimsel çalışmaların önünde önemli bir engel olarak görmektedir. Bu bağlamda dini bir hareket olarak Terasem Trans-din Hareketi kurulmuştur. Söz konusu grup, transhümanizm ile ulaşılacak trans-human’ın yani aşkın insanın aşkın dini olarak sunulmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, tüm dinler ile uzlaşmacı ve kapsayıcı bir aşkın din olarak sunulan Terasem Trans-dini Dinler Tarihi perspektifinden ele alınmış ve değerlendirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Transhümanizm, Tekno-din, Terasem Hareketi, Terasem Trans-dini, Hafıza dosyaları

Kaynakça

• Anastasia, Kriman. “Comparative Analysis of Transhumanism and Posthumanism in the Context of the Idea of Posthuman”. 6th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on SOCIAL SCIENCES and ARTS Proceedings, Ancience Science. 95–101. STEF92 Technology, 2019.
• Bainbridge, William Sims. “Identity Expansion and Transcendence”. Journal of Philosophical Studies 7/26 (2014), 117–140. https://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/118
• Bainbridge, William Sims (ed.). Dynamic Secularization. Springer, Cham, 2017.
• Bernstein, Anya. The Future of Immortality: Remaking Life and Death in Contemporary Russia. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kxp/detail.action?docID=5741862
• Bernstein, Anya. “Freeze, die, come to life : the many paths to immortality in post-Soviet Russia”. American ethnologist (2015).
• Bouzenita, Anke İman. ““The Most Dangerous Idea?” Islamic Deliberations on Transhumanism”. darulfunun ilahiyat 29/2 (2018), 201–228. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/darulfunun/issue/40844/505720
• Burtsev, Mikhail. Evolution, Cybernetics and Philosophical Theory of Knowledge: Summer University Complex Systems course 2001. Central European University, Budapest. Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, 2007. https://www.keldysh.ru/pages/mrbur-web/philosophy/ecp.htm
• Campa, Riccardo. “Nietzsche and Transhumanism: A Meta-Analytical Perspective”. Studia Humana 8/4 (2019), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2019-0027
• Dağ, Ahmet. “Yaratılışa Müdahale ve Yeni Bir Evrimci Neo-Darwinist bir Yaklaşım Olarak Transhümanizm”. FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 27 (2019), 153–168. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/flsf/issue/45340/521563
• Dağ, Ahmet. “Nietzsche ve Transhümanizm Bağlantısı Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme”. FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 25 (2018), 207–224. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/flsf/issue/48633/618069
• Dydrov, Artur. “Coexistence Between Human and Posthuman in Transhumanism: The Basic Scenarios”. 5th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on SOCIAL SCIENCES and ARTS SGEM2018, Ancience Science. 457–463. STEF92 Technology, 2018.
• Eriksen, Annelin. “The Human Version 2.0: AI, Humanoids, and Immortality”. Social Analysis 65/1 (2021), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2021.650104
• Greene, Shelleen. “Bina 48: Race, Gender, and Queer Artificial Life”. Ada:, A Journal of Gender, New Media and Technology 9 (2016) (Erişim 14 Kasım 2021).
• Gültekin, Abdurrazak. “Transhümanizm Bağlamında Yapay Zekâ Tanrıya Bir Başkaldırı Mıdır?”. Iğdır Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 28 (2021), 1–16. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/igdirsosbilder/issue/65608/946540
• Halden, Grace. “2B or Not to Be … A Review of 2B: The Era of Flesh is Over (2009)”. Trespassing Journal: an Online Journal of Trespassing Art, Science, and Philosophy Fall/4 (2014) (Erişim 14 Kasım 2021). http://trespassingjournal.org/Issue4/TPJ_I4__Halden_FilmReview.pdf
• Kavner, Lucas. “'You, Robot': Personal Robots For The Masses”. HuffPost (2012). https://www.huffpost.com/entry/you-robot-personal-robots_n_1660362
• Kurzweil, Ray. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. East Rutherford: Penguin Publishing Group, 2005. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gbv/detail.action?docID=6099737
• More, Max. “The Philosophy of Transhumanism”. The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future. ed. Max More – Natasha Vita-More. 3–17. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.
• NewReligionWiki. “Terasem”. Erişim 11 Kasım 2021. https://nrm.fandom.com/wiki/Terasem
• Quer, Matías. “Fear of Death as the Foundation of Modern Political Philosophy and Its Overcoming by Transhumanism”. Postmodern Openings 11/4 (2020), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.4/238
• Ranisch, Robert. Post- and transhumanism: An introduction / Robert Ranisch, Stefan Lorenz Sorgner (eds.). New York: Peter Lang, 1. Basım, 2014.
• Rothblatt, Martine. “Are we Transbemans yet?”. Journal of Evolution and Technology 18/1 (2008), 94–107 (Erişim 15 Kasım 2021). https://jetpress.org/v18/rothblatt.htm
• Rothblatt, Martine. “The Legal Status Of Multiple Revived Versions Of A Person”. Journal of Personal Cyberconsciousness 07/01 (2012), 37–42 (Erişim 14 Kasım 2021). https://www.terasemjournals.org/PCJournal/PC0701/Papers/Rothblatt.pdf
• Roy, Jessica. “Rapture of the Nerds”. The Culture 183/24 (2014), 54–55. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asn&AN=96442000&lang=tr&site=ehost-live
• Schussler, Aura-Elena. “Transhumanism As A New Techno-Religion And Personal Development: In The Framework Of A Future Technological Spirituality”. Journal for the Study of Religions & Ideologies 18/53 (2019), 92–106. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=obo&AN=137298608&lang=tr&site=ehost-live
• Smith, Wesley J. “New-Time Religion”. First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life 248 (2014), 19–21. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asn&AN=99416598&lang=tr&site=ehost-live
• Stein, Andrew. “Can Machines Feel? A Reporter Discusses Life, Politics and God with an Android”. Math Horizons 19/4 (2012), 10–13 (Erişim 14 Kasım 2021). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.4169/mathhorizons.19.4.10
• Terasem Movement Foundation. “Terasem Hypotheses”. Erişim 11 Kasım 2021. https://terasemmovementfoundation.com/board-of-directors
• TerasemCentral.org. “Terasem Movement, Inc”. Erişim 1 Aralık 2021. https://terasemcentral.org/archive.html
• TerasemCentral.org. “Terasem Movement, Inc”. Erişim 11 Kasım 2021. https://terasemcentral.org/scitech.html
• TerasemFaith.net. “Rituals”. Erişim 11 Kasım 2021. https://terasemfaith.net/rituals/
• TerasemFaith.net. “Terasem Faith”. Erişim 1 Aralık 2021. https://terasemfaith.net
• TerasemFaith.net. “Beliefs of Terasem”. Erişim 13 Ekim 2021. https://terasemfaith.net/beliefs/
• TerasemWeb.org. “Terasem Movement Transreligion”. Erişim 24 Eylül 2021. http://www.terasemweb.org
• Winyard Sr., David C. “Transhumanism: Christian Destiny or Distraction?”. Perspectives on Science & Christian Faith 72/2 (2020), 67–82. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asn&AN=143607625&lang=tr&site=ehost-live
• Yeşilyurt, Muhammet. “Hıristiyan Transhümanizmi: Hıristiyanlığın Tekno-Eskatolojik Yeni Yorumu”. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi 21/2 (2021), 815–845. https://doi.org/10.33415/daad.938435
• Yeşilyurt, Muhammet. “Hıristiyanlığın “Imago Dei” Öğretisinin Transhümanizmle Uzlaştırılmasının İmkânı”. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi 9/5 (2020), 3624–3650 (Erişim 12 Nisan 2021). http://www.itobiad.com/tr/download/article-file/1428528
• Young, Simon. Designer evolution: A transhumanist manifesto. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2006.