AVRASYA BÖLGESİNDE ÇOK TARAFLILIK VE BÖLGESELCİLİK TARTIŞMALARI: KIRGIZİSTAN TERCİHİNİN KURAMSAL NEDENLERİ

Volume: 1 Number: 4 December 1, 2012
  • Zamirbek Manasov
EN TR

AVRASYA BÖLGESİNDE ÇOK TARAFLILIK VE BÖLGESELCİLİK TARTIŞMALARI: KIRGIZİSTAN TERCİHİNİN KURAMSAL NEDENLERİ

Abstract

In this paper whether Kyrgyzstan should stay in the World Trade Organization or should take part in the newly established Customs Union among Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia would be analyzed in the framework of theoretical literature. From the start of the foundation of the new Customs Union there have been deep discussions among the proponents and opponents of organization. This issue attracted extra attention and interest because the new Customs Union includes non-members of the World Trade Organization such as Belarus, and Kazakhstan. Kyrgyzstan is already a member country of WTO and is going to join the new Customs Union. How will this membership work for Kyrgyzstan in short and long-term period? Will the new Customs Union be substitutive or complementary to the WTO in the development of international trade of Kyrgyzstan? Which side would be more beneficial for Kyrgyzstan: membership to a regional Customs Union or to a multilateral WTO? This paper hopes to analyze these main questions through the lens of theory. It would be argued that new Custom Union like previous ones, tend to be instrument of to keep contemporary policy rather than to solve the long-term problems of international trade in the region

Keywords

References

  1. Aslund, Anders., 2010, “Why Doesn’t Russia Join the WTO?”, Center for Strategic and International Studies, The Washington Quarterly, No 33:2 pp. 49-63.
  2. Bagwell, Kyle, and Robert W. Staiger,1999, Regionalism and Multilateral Tariff Cooperation, in International Trade Policy and the Pacific Rim, ed.by John Piggott and Alan Woodland, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  3. Bhagwati, Jagdish, and Arvind Panagariya, 1999, Preferential Trading Areas and Multilateralism: Strangers, Friends or Foes?” in Regionalism in Trade Policy: Essays on Preferential Trading, ed. by Arvind Panagariya, River Edge, N.J. and London: World Scientific.
  4. Bohr, Annette., 2004, “Regionalism in Central Asia: New Geopolitics, Old Regional Order”, International Affairs, Volume 80, Issue 3, pages 485–502.
  5. Broadman, H.G., 2005, From Disintegration to Reintegration, Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union in International Trade, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and The World Bank, Washington DC 20433.
  6. Crawford, Jo-Ann., Laird, Sam., 2000, “Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO”, Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade, University of Nottingham, No. 00/3.
  7. Davey, W.J., 2010, The WTO Dispute Settlement System: How Have Developing Countries Fared? in Is the World Trade Organization Attractive Enough for Emerging Economies? Critical Essays on the Multilateral Trading System, ed. by Zdenek Drabek. Palgrave Macmilan.
  8. Drabek, Z., Bacchetta, M., 2010, Effects of WTO Accession on Policymaking in Sovereign States: Lessons from Transition Countries, in Is the World Trade Organization Attractive Enough for Emerging Economies? Critical Essays on the Multilateral Trading System, ed. by Zdenek Drabek. Palgrave Macmilan.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Zamirbek Manasov This is me

Publication Date

December 1, 2012

Submission Date

December 1, 2012

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2012 Volume: 1 Number: 4

APA
Manasov, Z. (2012). MULTILATERALISM VERSUS REGIONALISM IN EURASIA: THEORETICAL REASONS OF CHOOSING SIDE FOR KYRGYZSTAN. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(4), 37-59. https://izlik.org/JA33SE29SB
AMA
1.Manasov Z. MULTILATERALISM VERSUS REGIONALISM IN EURASIA: THEORETICAL REASONS OF CHOOSING SIDE FOR KYRGYZSTAN. MJSS. 2012;1(4):37-59. https://izlik.org/JA33SE29SB
Chicago
Manasov, Zamirbek. 2012. “MULTILATERALISM VERSUS REGIONALISM IN EURASIA: THEORETICAL REASONS OF CHOOSING SIDE FOR KYRGYZSTAN”. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 1 (4): 37-59. https://izlik.org/JA33SE29SB.
EndNote
Manasov Z (December 1, 2012) MULTILATERALISM VERSUS REGIONALISM IN EURASIA: THEORETICAL REASONS OF CHOOSING SIDE FOR KYRGYZSTAN. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 1 4 37–59.
IEEE
[1]Z. Manasov, “MULTILATERALISM VERSUS REGIONALISM IN EURASIA: THEORETICAL REASONS OF CHOOSING SIDE FOR KYRGYZSTAN”, MJSS, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 37–59, Dec. 2012, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA33SE29SB
ISNAD
Manasov, Zamirbek. “MULTILATERALISM VERSUS REGIONALISM IN EURASIA: THEORETICAL REASONS OF CHOOSING SIDE FOR KYRGYZSTAN”. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 1/4 (December 1, 2012): 37-59. https://izlik.org/JA33SE29SB.
JAMA
1.Manasov Z. MULTILATERALISM VERSUS REGIONALISM IN EURASIA: THEORETICAL REASONS OF CHOOSING SIDE FOR KYRGYZSTAN. MJSS. 2012;1:37–59.
MLA
Manasov, Zamirbek. “MULTILATERALISM VERSUS REGIONALISM IN EURASIA: THEORETICAL REASONS OF CHOOSING SIDE FOR KYRGYZSTAN”. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, vol. 1, no. 4, Dec. 2012, pp. 37-59, https://izlik.org/JA33SE29SB.
Vancouver
1.Zamirbek Manasov. MULTILATERALISM VERSUS REGIONALISM IN EURASIA: THEORETICAL REASONS OF CHOOSING SIDE FOR KYRGYZSTAN. MJSS [Internet]. 2012 Dec. 1;1(4):37-59. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA33SE29SB

MANAS Journal of Social Studies
 

Published issues, issue files, and article files are licensed under the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.

The content on our website is licensed under the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC 4.0 license.