THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC’S ENTRANCE INTO THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION: HISTORICAL PARALLELS WITH STATE FORMATION IN EUROPE AND THE POTENTIAL IMPACT ON ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT

Abstract

Modern geopolitical challenges require the Kyrgyz Republic to concentrate on regional integration in its economic and political development. By the end of the 1990’s, the Kyrgyz Republic realized the need to adjust its development strategy in favor of regionalization, aiming at a partial recovery of economic and political ties that existed in Soviet times. In December 2014, the countries of Eurasian Economic Union (Russian Federation, Kazakhstan, and Belarus) approved the road map on accession of the Kyrgyz Republic, and between April-July 2015 parliaments of member countries ratified accession of the Kyrgyz Republic. This paper examines one of the most pressing questions for the Kyrgyz Republic: how will accession to the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) impact economic and political development in the Kyrgyz Republic? We consider some of the main issues surrounding accession to the EEU by noting some historical parallels with the analysis in H. Spruyt’s (1994) influential work, The Sovereign State and Its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems Change. We argue that accession of the Kyrgyz Republic to the EEU is positive from a current economic standpoint. However, since there are also political risks along with potential long-term economic risks, we argue for a cautious yet balanced position

Keywords

• Kyrgyz Republic, Eurasian Economic Union, Europe, Economic Development

References

1. Balassa, Bela, 2012, The Theory of Economic Integration. Routledge.
2. Castells, Maunuel, 2004. The Power of Identity. Wiley-Blackwell.
3. Cederman, Larc-Eric, 1997. Emergent Actors in World Politics: How States and Nations Develop and Dissolve. Stanford University Press.
4. Cooley, Alexander and Hendrik Spruyt, 2009. Contracting States: Sovereign Transfers in International Relations. Princeton University Press.
5. Gould, Stephen Jay, 1989. A Wonderful Life, W.W. Norton and Company.
6. Hancock, K.J., 2009. Regional Integration: Choosing Plutocracy. Palgrave McMillan.
7. Hobbes, Thomas, 1994. Leviathan. Hackett.
8. Hopkirk, Peter, 1992. The Great Game: The Struggle for Empire in Central Asia. Kodansha International.

9. Keating, Michael, 2000. The New Regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial Restructuring and Political Change. Edward Elgar Publishing.
10. Krasner, Stephen, (Jan. 1984). “Approaches to State.” Comparative Politics Vol. 16, No. 2: 223-246.
11. Kuru, Ahmet, (Summer, 2014). “Authoritarianism and Democracy in Muslim Countries.” Political Science Quarterly 129, 3: 399-427.
12. Lake, David A. and Robert Powel, 1999. Strategic choice and international relations. Princeton University Press.
13. McGlinchey, Eric, 2011. Chaos, Violence, Dynasty: Politics and Islam in Central Asia. Pittsburg University Press.
14. Osiander, Andreas, 2001. “Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth”. International Organization, 55.2 (Spring): 251-287.
15. Rawls, John, 1993. A Theory of Justice, Rev. Ed. Harvard University Press.
16. Spruyt, Hendrick, 1994. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
17. Thucydides, (1993). The Landmark Thucydides: A Comprehensive Guide to the Peloponnesian War. (Ed. R. Crawley, Trans. V.D. Hanson). Free Press.
18. Tilly, Charles 1992. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990-1992. Wiley-Blackwell.
19. Tiulegenov, Medet, 2015. “A Certain Path to an Uncertain Future.” FES International Policy Analysis: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id-moe/11252-20150429.pdf
20. Trilling, David (April 15, 2014). “Tajikistan: Migrant Remittances Now Exceed Half of GDP,” Eurasianet: http://www.eurasianet.org/node/68272.
21. Weber, Max, (2004), “Politics as a Vocation,” in The Vocation Lectures. (Eds. D. Owen and T. Strong. Trans. R. Livingstone). Hackett.
22. The World Bank, (2014): http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GNP.PCAP.CD
23. Ushkalova, Daria (2013), “Formation of CU and Common Economic Space of Russia, Belorussia and Kazakhstan: Problems and Preliminary Results,” Rossiyskaya Akademia Nauk, Institut Ekonomiki (Russian Academy of Science, Institute of Economy).