The Comparison of Two Different Election Campaign Films in Terms of Their Approaches towards National History and Development

Year 2020, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 301 - 312, 27.01.2020

Yusuf Devran , Fahad Shahzad

https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.545712

Abstract

In this
article the 1988 presidential election campaign film of French Socialist Party “La France Unie” and 2016 presidential election campaign film of
Turkish AK Party “Anka Kuşu” were analyzed in terms of their
approaches to history and development. The films were analyzed by taking
semiotic, discourse and rhetorical analysis methods into consideration. The
focus has been kept on text and the message given by both parties in the films.
The comparison clearly points out the differences regarding the approach of the
both parties towards history and development.

Keywords

Political Communication, Turkish Politics, Election Campaigns

References

• Ackerman, B., & Ayres, L. (2002). Voting with dollars: A new paradigm for campaign finance. Virginia: R. R. Donnelley and Sons, Harrisonburg.
• Alterman, E. (2004). When presidents lie: A history of official deception and its consequences. New York: Penguin Group.
• Ascher, W. & Hirschfelder-Ascher, B. (2005). Revitalizing the political psychology. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
• Duymaz, A. (1998). Anadolu ve Balkan Türklerinin halk anlatmalarında mitolojik bir kuş: Zümrüdüanka. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(2), 91-97.
• Eskier, U. (2019). Zümrüdü Anka (Simurg) Efsanesi. https://www.makaleler.com/zumrudu-anka-simurg-efsanesi, Retrieved on Mar. 3, 2019
• Esser, F., & Pfetsch, B. (2004). Comparing political communication: theories, cases and challenges. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Gurevitch, M. & Blumler, J. G. (2004). State of the art of the comparative political communication research: Poised by maturity? Comparing Political communication: Theories, Cases and Challenges. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Hovland, C. I. (1959). Reconciling conflicting results derived from experimental and survey studies of attitude change. American Psychologist, 14(1), 8-17.
• Halper, S., & Clarke, J. (2004). America alone: The neo-conservatives and the global affair. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Johnson, D. W. (2001). No place for amateurs: How political consultants are reshaping American democracy. London: Routledge.
• Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How voters decide: Information processing during election campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• McNair, B. (2003). An introduction to political communication. New York: Routledge Press.
• Motta, M. P., & Fowler, E. F. (2016). The content and effect of political advertising in US campaigns. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Retrieved on Mar. 13, 2019, http://oxfordre.com
• Maarek, P. J. (2005). Political communication in new era. New York: Routledge Press
• Norris, P. (2016). Global political communication: Good governance, human development and mass communication. Comparing political communication: Theories, cases and challenges. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Simurg Zümrüdü Anka Kuşu Türk Mitolojisi, https://www.dogaustu.net/mitoloji-tarih/simurg-zumrudu-anka-kusu-turk-mitolojisi.html, Retrieved on Mar. 19, 2019
• Stout, L. W. (2006). Time for a change: Ideal leadership series. Shippensburg: Destiny Image Publishers, Inc.
• Tenpas, K. D. (2003). Presidents as candidates: Inside the whitehouse for the presidential campaign. London: Routledge Press.
• Tansü, Y.E. & Güvenç, B. (2017). Mitolojik Kuşlar Üzerine Düşünceler (Phoenix, Garuda, Simurg, Karakuş, Anka), Doç. Dr. Numan Durak Aksoy Anısına (ed. Y.E. Tansü, M.Biçici), Gaziantep, Gaziantep University, pp. 783-806