Approaches To Interdisciplinary Ontological Evolution Of Dimensions Of Global Governance Theory/ Küresel Yönetişim Teorisinin Disiplinlerarasi Ontolojik Boyutlarina Yönelik Yaklaşimlar

Year 2010, Volume: 7 Issue: 13, 78 - 97, 10.03.2014

Hakan Altıntaş Tan Baykal

Abstract

Abstract

This article systematizes the ontology of Global governance or world governance and the processes of their inclusion in policy decision process. Global governance or world governance is the political interaction of transnational actors aimed at solving problems that affect more than one state or region when there is no power of enforcing compliance.

First, We provide an interdisciplinary ontological evolution of dimensions of governance theory and Incentives, Means of enforcement and Planning. Secondly, We focus on three different governance forms. Lastly, We examine on patients with global governance of the organizational structure of the Turkish exporters and importers of textile firms to analyze the effect of transformation will be attempted.

Key Words: Global Governance, Textile Sector, Uni-lateral Learning and Bilateral Learning

KÜRESEL YÖNETİŞİM TEORİSİNİN DİSİPLİNLERARASI ONTOLOJİK BOYUTLARINA YÖNELİK YAKLAŞIMLAR

Özet

Bu çalışma, Küresel yönetişim veya dünya hükümeti kavramının kamu siyasası üretim sürecindeki etkileri ontolojik bir sistematik bağlamında ele alınmıştır. Küresel yönetişim veya dünya hükümeti, ulus-üstü aktörlerin etkileşimi içerisinde ülkelerin veya bölgesel yönetimleri etkileyen sorunların devletler arası resmi işbirliği çerçevesinde çözecebileceğini belirtir. Çalışmada ilk olarak, Küresel yönetişimi teşvik edici unsurlar, planlama ve uygulamaya yönelik araçlara ilişkin açıklamalarda bulunulmuştur. İkincil olarak, üç ayri yönetişim biçimine odaklanılmıştır, Son bölümde ise küresel yönetişim olgusunun Türk ihracatçı ve ithalatçı tekstil firmalarının örgütsel yapılarının dönüşümüne olan etkileri analiz edilmeye çalışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Küresel Yönetişim, Tekstil Sektörü, Tek Yönlü Öğrenme, Çok Yönlü Öğrenme

Keywords

Küresel Yönetişim, Tekstil Sektörü, Tek Yönlü Öğrenme, Çok

References

• References
• Achrol, R.,L. Scheer and L.Stern.(1990). Designing successful transorganizational marketing alliances. Marketing Science Institut. Cambridge, MA, Report no. 90-118.
• Axelrod, R., 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
• Bagozzi, R.P. and Yi, T., 1988. “On the evaluation of structural equation models”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16: 74-94.
• Bello, D., and Gilliland, D., 1997. “The Effect of Output Controls, Process Controls, and Flexibility on Export Channel Performance”. Journal of Marketing, 61: 22-38.
• Bollen, K.A., 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.
• Boris, B. and Jemison, D.B., 1989. “Hybrid Arrangements as Strategic Alliances: Theoretical Issues in Organizational Combinations”. Academy of Management Review, 14: 234-249.
• Chetty, S., and Eriksson, K., 1998. Mutual Commitment and Experiential Knowledge in International Business Relationships. WP. Department of Business Studies, Uppsala University.
• Churchill, G.A., 1979. “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs”. Journal of Marketing Research, XVI:64-73.
• Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T., 1979. Quasi-Experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston: Houghton Niffin Company.
• Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G., 1963. A Behaviour Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Dyer, J.H., and Singh, H., 1998. “The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganisational Competitive Advantage”. Academy of Management Review, 23: 660-679.
• Etgar, M., 1976. “Effects of Administrative Control on Efficiency of Vertical Marketing Systems”. Journal of Marketing Research, 13: 12-24.
• Gadde, L.E., and HÃ¥kansson, H., 1993. Professional Purchasing. Routledge: London Gerbing, D.W. and Anderson, J.C., 1988. An updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and its Assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25: 186-192.
• Ghosh, M., and John, G., 1999. “Governance Value Analysis and Marketing Strategy”. Journal of Marketing, 63:131-145.
• Grandori, A. and Soda, G., 1995. “Inter-Firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms”. Organization Studies, 16: 183-214.
• Gulati, R., and Singh, H., 1998. “The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 781-814.
• Handsfield, R.B., Krause, D.R., Scannell, T.V. and Monczka, R.M., 2000. “Avoid the Pitfalls in Supplier Development”. Sloan Management Review, Winter, 37-49.
• Hayes, R., and Abarnathy, W., 1980. “Managing Our Way to Economic Decline”. Harvard Business Review, July-August, 67-77.
• Heide, J., 1994. “Interorganizational Governance in Marketing Channels”. Journal of Marketing, 58: 71-85.
• Krause, D.R., 1997. “Supplier Development: Current Practices and Outcomes.” International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 33: 12-19.
• McDougall, P. and R. Robinson, Jr., 1990. “New Venture Strategies. An empirical Identification of eight ”archetypes” of competitive strategies for entry”. Strategic Management Journal, 11: 447-467.
• McGrath, J. E., 1982. “Dilemmatics: The Study of Research Choices and Dilemmas.” In J. E. McGrath (Ed.), Judgement Calls in Research: 69-102. Beverly Hill: Sage.
• Mitchell, T.R., 1985. “An evaluation of the validity of correlational research conducted in organisations”. Academy of Management Review, 10: 192-205.
• Palay, T., 1984. “Comparative Institutional Economics: The Governance of Rail Freight Contracting”, Journal of Legal Studies,13: 265-288.
• Phillips, L.W., 1981. “Assessing Measurement Error in Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in Marketing”. Journal of Marketing Research, 18: 395-415.
• Poppo, L., and Zenger, T., 2000. “Substitutes or Complements? Exploring the Relationship between Formal Contracts and Relational Governance. Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection:” http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf? abstract_id=223518.
• Porter, M.E., 1980. Competitive Strategy. New York: The Free Press.
• Raia, E., 1991. “Taking Time Out of Product Design”. Purchasing, 4: 36-39.
• Rubin, D.B., 1976. “Inference and missing data”. Biometrika, 63: 581-592.
• Schafer, J. L., 1997. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. Chapman&Hall,UK.
• Shipley, D. D., 1984. “Selection and Motivation of Distribution Intermediaries”. Industrial Marketing Management, 13: 249-256.
• Shipley, D.Cook, D., Barnett, E. 1990. European Journal of Marketing, 23: 79-93.
• Sivadas, E., and Dwyer, F.R., 2000. “An Examination of Organizational Factors Influencing New Product Success in Internal and Alliance-Based Processes”. Journal of Marketing, 64: 31-49.
• Spekman, R. and K. Grønhaug, 1986. “Methodological Issues in buying center research”. European Journal of Marketing, 20: 50-63.
• Thompson, J. D., 1967. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw Hill.
• Tuite, M., 1972. “Toward a Theory of Joint Decision Making. In M., Chisholm”, R. and Radnor, M. (Eds.), Interorganizational Decision, Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.
• Von Hippel, E., 1988. The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford Uni.Press.
• Walker, G., and Weber, D., 1984. “A Transaction Cost Approach to Make-or-buy Decisions”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 373-391.
• Watts, C. and Hahn, C., 1993. “Supplier Development Programs: An Empirical Analysis”. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, (Spring), 11-17.