Cost analysis in peanut bagging (human labor & prototype bagging machine)

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to economically compare the method that could semi-mechanized bagging and the method that uses human labor.

Methods and Results: For this reason, a Prototype Pneumatic Peanut Bagging Machine powered by tractor PTO shaft was designed, manufactured and used, which conveys peanut pods from the ground using aspirated air and fill the product into the bags. As a result of the cost analysis made within the scope of the study, the cost of bagging using human labor costs 7.2 $ t^-1, and the prototype bagging machine costs 9.6 $ t^-1. It was determined that an average of 2.5% loss occurs due to crushing while the bags were filled with human labor. In a day of work, 15 tons of products were generally bagged and loaded on a truck. In this case, approximately 375 kg of product was lost. The shelled peanut price was approximately 1.6 $ kg^-1 in 2019. The approximate monetary value of the 375 kg lost product was $600. This loss should be taken into account when evaluating both bagging methods in terms of costs.

Conclusions: It has been found that bagging with a prototype machine is more profitable and more humane in terms of conditions than bagging using human labor.

Significance and Impact of the Study: In terms of mechanization in the cultivation and harvesting of peanuts was no problem but some post-harvest processes (especially bagging) still require a large amount of human labor and has such as some basic problems with peanut bagging. Due to lean working and dusty environment, there was a difficult and tiring working situation in terms of occupational health. Thus was getting more and more difficult to find workers for this heavy work conditions. In addition, the shovel or canister used in bagging breaks the peanut shells and causes losses.

Keywords

• Cost analysis
• peanut
• bagging
• human labor
• bagging machine

Yerfıstığı çuvallama işinde maliyet analizi (insan işgücü & prototip çuvallama makinesi)

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Maliyet analizi
• yerfıstığı
• çuvallama
• insan işgücü
• çuvallama makinesi

References

1. Anonymous (2018) Research on determination of the shelf life and quality of osmaniye peanuts project final report, 76 s. http://www.tuksiad.org/uploads/yuklemeler/TUKSIAD-yer-fistigi-kitabi2.pdf Date of access 15.02.2019 (in Turkish)
2. Aşık FF, Arıoğlu H (2018) The effects of bacteria (Rhizobium sp.) and nitrogen fertilizer applications on some agricultural and quality characteristics in peanut cultivation. Ç.Ü Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. Year 2018 Vol: 36-2. (in Turkish)
3. Butts CL, Sorensen RB, Lamb MC (2018) Unloading farmers’ stock warehouses with a peanut vacuum. Peanut Science (2018) 45:87–94.
4. Deligönül F (1986) Transport and conveying technique. C.U. Faculty of Agriculture Lecture Notes. Publication No.:3 Adana. (in Turkish)
5. Ergür HS, Yörü Y, Üreyen İ (2005) Investigation of problems encountered in pneumatic conveying and solutions. Chamber of Mechanical Engineers IV. National Hydraulic Pneumatic Congress. December 01-04 İzmir. pp 115-134. (in Turkish)
6. FAO (2019) The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (Date of access: 10.06.2021)
7. Güner M (2007) Pneumatic conveying characteristics of some agricultural seeds. Journal of Food Engineering. 80 (2007) 904–913.
8. Hardin RG (2014) Pneumatic conveying of seed cotton: minimum velocity and pressure drop. Transactions of the ASABE. 57(2):391-400. (DOI: 10.13031/trans.57.10437)

9. Jones MG, Williams KC (2008) Predicting the mode of flow in pneumatic conveying systems-A review. Particuology 6 (2008) 289–300
10. Kadiroğlu A, Baydar H, Kocatürk M (2011) The effect of gypsum application on yield and quality characteristics of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). West Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute, Journal of Derim, 2011, 28 (2):42-54. (in Turkish)
11. Pan R, Wypych PW (1997) Pressure drop and slug velocity in low-velocity pneumatic conveying of bulk solids. Powder Technology 94 123- 132.
12. Topçu Y (2009) Logistic analysis of factors affecting the efficiency of peanut farms. T.R. Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology. Journal of Verimlilik. 2009(29), 83–97. (in Turkish)
13. Uğurluay S, İnce A, Sessiz A, Kayişoğlu B, Güzel E, Özcan MT (2010) Harvest threshing machines and principles. Nobel Bookstore. ISBN: 978-605-397-111-5. (in Turkish)
14. Wypych PW, Yi J (2002) Minimum transport boundary for horizontal dense-phase pneumatic conveying of granular materials. Powder Technology 129 (2003) 111–121.