Siyah Alaca ineklerde buzağılama sonrası vücut kondisyonu ile süt verim özellikleri arasındaki ilişkiler

Öz

Bu çalışmada, 55 baş Siyah Alaca ırkı inekte buzağılama sonrası vücut kondisyonu ile süt verim özellikleri arasındaki ilişkiler incelenmiştir. İnekler, vücut kondisyon puanlarına göre birinci (VKP<3) ve ikinci grup (VKP≥3) olmak üzere iki gruba ayrılmıştır. Vücut kondisyon puanlamasında 5’lik puan sistemi kullanılmıştır. Birinci ve ikinci inek gruplarında, buzağılama sonrası ilk 1. aydaki vücut kondisyon puanı (BS1: 2.82, 3.36), buzağılama sonrası 5. aydaki vücut kondisyon puanı (BS5: 3.21, 3.57), kuru dönem ile buzağılama sonrası ilk 1. ay arasındaki vücut kondisyon puanındaki düşüş (DÜŞÜŞ: 1.23, 0.80), laktasyonun 1. ve 5. ay arasındaki vücut kondisyon puanındaki artış (ARTIŞ1: 0.39, 0.21), laktasyonun 1. ve 7. ay arasındaki vücut kondisyon puanındaki artış (ARTIŞ2: 0.93, 0.64) ile süt verim özellikleri bakımından gruplar arasındaki farklılıklar istatistiki olarak önemli (p<0.05) bulunmuştur. Günlük süt verimi, laktasyon süt verimi, 305 günlük süt verimi, laktasyon süresi ve kuruda kalma süresi birinci ve ikinci grup inekler için sırasıyla; 22.35, 25.98 kg; 5572.96, 6435.18 kg; 5572.96, 6338.57 kg; 278.15, 306.68 gün; 71.22 ve 60.25 gün olarak tespit edilmiştir. Süt verim özellikleri ile kuru dönem vücut kondisyon puanı (KD), BS1, BS5 ve BS7 arasında negatif yönde, DÜŞÜŞ ve ARTIŞ2 arasında ise pozitif yönde önemli (p<0.05) korelasyonlar belirlenmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları, buzağılama sırasında orta düzeyde vücut kondisyonuna sahip olan ineklerde süt verim düzeylerinin daha iyi durumda olduğunu ve metabolik hastalıkların daha az sıklıkla görüldüğünü ortaya koymuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Süt verim özellikleri
• vücut kondisyonu
• buzağılama sonrası
• Siyah Alaca

The relations between post partum body condition and milk yield traits in Holstein Friesian cows

Abstract

In this study, the relationships between post-calving body condition and milk yield characteristics were investigated in 55 Holstein Friesian cows. Cows were divided into two groups according to their body condition scores as the first (VKP<3) and the second group (VKP≥3). A 5-point scale system was used in body condition scoring. In the first and second cow groups, body condition score at the 1st month after calving (BS1: 2.82, 3.36), the body condition score at the 5th month after calving (BS5: 3.21, 3.57), the decrease in body condition score between the 1st month after calving (DECREASE: 1.23, 0.80), the increase in body condition score between the 1st and 5th months of lactation (INCREASE 1: 0.39, 0.21) and the increase in body condition score between the 1st and 7th months of lactation (INCREASE2: 0.93, 0.64), and milk yield characteristics differences were found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). Daily milk yield, lactation milk yield, 305 days milk yield, lactation period and dry period for the first and second group cows respectively; 22.35, 25.98 kg; 5572.96, 6435.18 kg; 5572.96, 6338.57 kg; 278.15, 306.68 days; 71.22 and 60.25 days were determined. While negatively correlations between milk yield traits and body condition score of dry period (DP), BS1, BS5 and BS7, positively correlations between milk yield traits and DECREASE and INCREASE2 were found significantly (p<0.05). These results show that cows having medium level body condition score in calving have better milk yield and lower incidence of metabolic diseases.

Keywords

• Milk yield traits
• body condition
• post calving
• Holstein Friesian

References

1. Aeberhard, K., Bruckmaier, R.M., Kuepfer, U., & Blum, J.W. (2001). Milk yield and composition, nutrition, body conformation traits, body condition scores, fertility and diseases in high yielding dairy cows. Part 1. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, A. Physiology, Pathology, Clinical Medicine, 48 (2), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0442.2001.00292.x
2. Appuhamy, J.A.D.R.N., Cassell. B.G., & Cole, J.B. (2009). Phenotypic and genetic relationships of common health disorders with milk and fat yield persistencies from producer-recorded health data and test-day yields. Journal of Dairy Science, 92 (4), 1785-1795. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1591
3. Bar-Anan, R., & Ron, M. (1985). Associations among milk yield, yield persistency, conception, and culling of Israeli Holstein dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 68 (2), 382-386. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)80835-3
4. Burke, J.M., De La Sota, R.L., Risco, C.A., Staples, C.R., Schmitt, E.J.P., & Thatcher, W.W. (1996). Evaluation of timed insemination using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 79 (8), 1385-1393. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(96)76496-2
5. Butler, W.R., & Smith, R.D. (1989). Interrelationships between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function. Journal of Dairy Science, 72 (3), 767-783. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79169-4
6. Butler, W.R. (2003). Energy balance relationship between the follicular development, ovulation and fertility in postpartum dairy cows. Livestock Production Science, 83 (2-3), 211-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(03)00112-X
7. Castaneda-Guti´errez, E., Pelton, S.H., Gilbert, R.O., & Butler, W.R. (2009). Effect of peripartum dietary energy supplementation of dairy cows on metabolites, liver function and reproductive variables. Animal Reproduction Science, 112 (3-4), 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.04.028
8. Daşkın, A. (2005). Sığırcılık İşletmelerinde Reprodüksiyon Yönetimi ve Suni Tohumlama. Aydan Yayınları, 280 sf., Ankara, Türkiye.

9. Dobbelaar, P. (1995). Body condition of cows. Veepro Holland, 23, 12-13.
10. Duffield, T.F., Leslie, K.E., Sandals, D., & Lissemore, K. (1999). Effect of prepartum administration of monensin in a controlled release capsule on milk production and milk components in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science, 82 (2), 272-279. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75233-1
11. Edmonson, A.J., Lean, I.J., Weaver, L.D., Farver, T., & Webster, G. (1989). A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 72 (1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79081-0
12. Encinias, A.M., & Lardy, G. (2000). Body condition scoring: managing your cow herd through body condition scoring. https://www.ag.ndsu.edu/pubs/ansci/beef/as1026.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 09.08.2023).
13. Eversole, D.E., Browne, M.F., Hall, J.B., & Dietz, R.E. (2000). Body condition scoring beef cows. https://www.pubs.ext.vt.edu/400/400-795/400-795.html (Erişim Tarihi: 02.08.2023).
14. Ferguson, J.D. (1993). Body condition scoring. Center for Animal Health and Productivity University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine.
15. Ferguson, J.D., Galligan, D.T., & Thomsen, N. (1994). Principal descriptors of body condition score in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 77 (9), 2695-26703. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77212-X
16. Ferguson, J.D. (1996). Implementation of a body condition scoring program in dairy herds. The Penn Annual Conference, USA.
17. Gearhart, M.A., Curtis, C.R., Erb, H.N., Smith, R.D., Sniffen, C.J., Chase, L.E., & Cooper, M.D. (1990). Relationship of chances in condition score to cow health in Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science, 73 (11), 3132-3140. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)79002-9
18. Gillund, P., Reksen, O., Grohn, Y.T., & Karlberg, K. (2001). Body condition related to ketosis and reproductive performance in Norwegian dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 84 (6), 1390-1396. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)70170-1
19. Hady, P.J., Domecq, J.J., & Kaneene, J.B. (1994). Frequency and precision of body condition scoring in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 77 (6), 1543-1547. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77095-8
20. Harder, B., Bennewitz, J., Hinrichs, D., & Kalm, E. (2006). Genetic parameters for health traits and their relationship to different persistency traits in German Holstein dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 89 (8), 3202-3212. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72595-4
21. Heuer, C., Schukken, Y.H., & Dobbelaar, P. (1999). Postpartum body condition score and results from the first test day milk as predictors of disease fertility, yield, and culling in commercial dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science, 82 (2), 295-304. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75236-7
22. Hwa, K., & Gook-Hyun, S. (2003). Effect of the amount of body condition loss from the dry to near calving periods on the subsequent body condition change, occurrence of postpartum diseases, metabolic parameters and reproductive performance in Holstein dairy cows. Theriogenology, 60 (8), 1445-1456. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(03)00135-3
23. Jilek, F., Pytloun, P., Kubešova, M., Štipkova, M., Bouška, J., Volek, J., Frelich, J., & Rajmon, R. (2008). Relationships among body condition score, milk yield and reproduction in Czech Fleckvieh cows. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 53 (9), 357-367.
24. Jones, G.M. (1990). Body condition scores for evaluation of nutritional status. Virginia Cooperative Extension Service, Dairy Guadelines Publication, Virginia.
25. Mangione, D.A. (2001). Scoring cows can improve profits. Ohio State University Extension Fact Shee, Department of Animal Sciences, 2029 Fyffe Road, Columbus, Ohio 43210-1095. https://ohioline.osu.edu/l292/ (Erişim Tarihi: 04.07.2023).
26. Markusfeld, O., Galon, N., & Ezra, E. (1997). Body condition score, health, yield and fertility in dairy cows. Veterinary Record, 141, 67-72. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.141.3.67
27. Meikle, A., Kulcsar, M., Chillard, Y., Febel, H., Delavaud, C., Cavestany, D., & Chilibroste, P. (2004). Effect of parity and body condition at parturition on endocrine and reproductive parameters of the cow. Society for Reproduction and Fertility, ISSN 1470-1626.
28. Montiel, F., & Ahuja, C. (2005). Body condition and suckling as factors influencing the duration of postpartum anestrus in cattle. Animal Reproduction Science, 85, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.11.001
29. Mouffok, C., Madani, T., Smara, L., Baitiche, M., Allouche, L., & Belkasmi, F. (2011). Relationship between body condition score, body weight, some nutritional metabolites changes in blood and reproduction in Algerian Montbeliard cows. Veterinary World, 4 (10), 461-466. https://doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2011.461-466
30. Parker, R. (1994). Using body condition scoring in dairy herd management. https://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/livestock/dairy/facts/94-053.htm (Erişim Tarihi: 19.07.2023).
31. Pedron, O., Chell, F., Senator, E., Baroli, D., & Rizza, R. (1993). Effect of body condition score at calving on performance, some blood parameters and milky fatty acid composition in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 76 (9), 2528-2535. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77588-8
32. Pennington, J.A. (2004). Body condition scoring with dairy cattle. University of Arkansas, United States Department of Agriculture and County Governments Cooperating. https://www.uaex.edu/publications/pdf/FSA-4008.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 19.07.2023).
33. Rastani, R.R., Andrew, S.M., Zinn, S.A., & Sniffen, C.J. (2001). Body composition and estimated tissue energy balance in jersey and Holstein cows during early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science, 84 (5), 1201-1209. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74581-X
34. Ruegg, P.L. (1991). Body condition scoring in dairy cows relationship with production, reproduction, nutrition and health. The Compendiom North American Edition, 13 (8), 1309-1313.
35. Ruegg, P.L., Goodger, W.J., Holmberg, C.A., Weaver, L.D., & Huffman, E.M. (1992). Relation among body condition score, milk production, and serum urea nitrogen and cholesterol concentrations in high-producing Holstein dairy cows in early lactation. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 53 (1), 5-9.
36. Sarar, A., & Tapkı, İ. (2017). Türkiye’de yetiştirilen Holştayn ineklerde süt verim özelliklerine ait fenotipik ve genotipik parametre tahminleri. Türk Tarım-Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 5 (10), 1243-1249. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v5i10.1243-1249.1434
37. Short, R.E., Bellows, R.A., Staigmiller, R.B., Berardinelli, J.G., & Custer, E.E. (1990). Physiological mechanisms controlling anestrus and fertility in postpartum beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 68 (3), 799-816. https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.683799x
38. Staples, C.R., Thatcher, W.W., Garcia, C.M., & Lucy, M. (1992). Nutritional influences on reproductive function in large dairy herd management, pages 382-392. Editors H.H. Van Horn and C.J. Wilcox, American Dairy Science Association, 309 West Clark St., Champaign IL., USA.
39. Şahin, O. (2014). Süt Sığırlarında Tip Sınıflandırması ve Vücut Kondisyonu Değerlendirme. Türkiye Damızlık Sığır Yetiştiricileri Merkez Birliği Yayınları No: 5, Ankara.
40. Şekerden, Ö., & Özkütük, K. (1993). Büyükbaş Hayvan Yetiştirme. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Kitabı No: 122, Adana.
41. Tapkı, İ., Önal, A.G., & Ünalan, A. (2005). Siyah alaca ineklerde kuru dönem vücut kondisyonunun buzağı doğum ağırlığı, üreme özellikleri ile süt verimi ve kompozisyonu üzerine etkisi. 2. Süt Verimi ve Kompozisyonu. MKÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 10 (1-2), 55-62.
42. Treacher, R.J., Reid, I.M., & Roberts, C.J. (1986). Effect of body condition at calving on the health and performance of dairy cows. Journal of Animal Production, 43 (1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100018286
43. Yaylak, E., & Kumlu, S. (2005). Siyah Alaca sığırların 305 günlük süt verimine vücut kondisyon puanı ve bazı çevre faktörlerinin etkisi. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 42 (3), 55-66.
44. Waltner, S.S., McNamara, J.P., & Hillers, J.K. (1993). Relationships of body condition score to production variables in high producing Holstein dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 76, 3410-3419.
45. Wattiaux, M.A. (1996). Reproduction and Genetic Selection. The Babcock Institute University of Wisconsin, 240 Agriculture Hall, 1450 Linden Drive Madison WI 5370-1562. 161, USA.
46. Wattiaux, M.A. (1999). Body condition scores. https://babcock.wisc.edu/node/170 (Erişim Tarihi: 24.06.2023).
47. Wattiaux, M.A. (2008). Managing Reproductıve Efficiency. Babcock Institute for International Dairy Research and Development Dairy Essentials, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA. https://babcock.cals.wisc.edu/downloads/de/13.en.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 24.06.2023).
48. Wright, I.A., & Russel, J.F. (1984). Partition of fat, body composition and body condition score in mature cows. Animal Production, 38, 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100041313