Biyostimulant uygulamalarının fasulyede fosforun yarayışlılığı ve verim üzerinde etkisi

Öz

Bu çalışmada farklı formda fosfor içeren gübrelerle birlikte uygulanan biyostimulantların fasulyede bitki gelişimi ve verimi üzerindeki etkileri araştırılmıştır. Çalışmada 6 farklı kombinasyondan oluşan uygulamalar [B1: Diamoyum fosfat (DAP), B2: DAP+humik asit (HA)+bakteri, enzim hormon (BEH), B3: kaya fosfat (KF), B4: KF+HA+BEH, B5: DAP+HA+BEH+salisilik asit (SA)+fulvik asit (FA) ve B6: KF+HA+BEH+SA+FA] bitki kök bölgesine topraktan uygulanmıştır. Uygulamaların bitki boyu, gövde çapı, yaprak alanı, bitki başına bakla sayısı, bitki başına bakla ağırlığı, bitki yaş ağırlığı, kök yaş ağırlığı, bitki kuru ağırlığı, kök kuru ağırlığı, klorofil içeriği ile yaprak mineral madde içeriği üzerine etkileri incelenmiştir. Ayrıca toprak mineral madde içeriği, pH, EC, kireç ve organik madde içerikleri de değerlendirilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre uygulamalar arasında istatistiksel olarak önemli farklılıkların olduğu, farklı formda fosfor içeren gübrelerle birlikte uygulanan biyostimulantların bitkilerde kontrol bitkilerine göre bitki boyu, gövde çapı, yaprak alanı, bitki ve kök gelişimi, klorofil içeriği, bakla verimi, bakla sayısı ve bakla ağırlığı üzerinde olumlu yönde etkiler yaptığı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca bitki ve toprak mineral içeriğinde de uygulamaların iyileştirici etkisi belirgin olmuştur. Özellikle farklı kaynaklardan oluşturulan biyostimulant formülasyonlarının fosfor gübresi ile birlikte kullanımının fasulye bitkisinde bitki büyümesi, verim ve kalite yönünden olumlu etkiler sağlamasının yanı sıra gübre kullanım etkinliğini artırması ve sürdürülebilir tarımda uygulanabilmesi açısından faydalı olabileceği düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Biyostimulant
• Fosfor
• Fasulye
• bitki gelişimi
• verim

Effect of biostimulant applications on phosphorus availability and yield in beans

Abstract

In this study, the effects of biostimulants applied together with different forms of phosphorus-containing fertilizers on plant growth and yield in bean were investigated. In the study, applications consisting of 6 different combinations (B1: Diammonium phosphate (DAP), B2: DAP+humic acid (HA)+bacteria, enzyme hormone (BEH), B3: rock phosphate (KF), B4: KF+HA+BEH, B5: DAP+HA+BEH+salicylic acid (SA)+fulvic acid (FA) and B6: KF+HA+BEH+SA+FA) were applied to the plant root zone through the soil. The effects of the applications on plant height, stem diameter, leaf area, number of pods per plant, pod weight per plant, plant fresh weight, root fresh weight, plant dry weight, root dry weight, chlorophyll content and leaf mineral content were investigated. Additionally, soil mineral content, pH, EC, lime and organic matter contents were also evaluated. According to the results obtained, it was determined that there were statistically significant differences between the applications and that biostimulants applied together with fertilizers containing different forms of phosphorus had positive effects on plant height, stem diameter, leaf area, plant and root development, chlorophyll content, pod yield, pod number and pod weight in plants compared to control plants. In addition, the amendatory effect of the applications on plant and soil mineral content has been evident. It is thought that the use of biostimulant formulations, especially those produced from different sources, together with phosphorus fertilizer will provide positive effects on bean plants in terms of plant growth, yield and quality, as well as increasing fertilizer use efficiency and being applicable in sustainable agriculture.

Keywords

• Biostimulant
• Phosphorus
• Bean
• plant growth
• yield

References

1. Aydoğan, M.N., Algur, Ö.F., & Özdemir, M. (2013). Trikalsiyum fosfat çözebilen bazı bakteri ve mikrofungusların izolasyonu ve karakterizasyonu. Adyutayam Dergisi, 1(1), 11-20.
2. Bindraban, P.S., Dimkpa, C.O., & Pandey, R. (2020). Exploring phosphorus fertilizers and fertilization strategies for improved human and environmental health. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 56(3), 299-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-019-01430-2
3. Bremner JM. 1996. Nitrogen-total. Methods of soil analysis part 3 chemical methods. SSSA Book Series 5. Madison (WI): Soil Science Society of America.
4. Calvo, P., Nelson, L., & Kloepper, J.W. (2014). Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant and Soil, 383, 3-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8
5. Canellas, L.P., & Olivares, F.L. (2014). Physiological responses to humic substances as plant growth promoter. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 1, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-5641-1-3
6. Canellas, L. P., Olivares, F. L., Aguiar, N. O., Jones, D. L., Nebbioso, A., Mazzei, P., & Piccolo, A. (2015). Humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants in horticulture. Scientia Horticulturae, 196, 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.013
7. Chen, C. &Roberson EB. (1996). Diffusion of glucose in microbial extracellular polysaccharide as affected by water potential. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 28: 877–884.
8. Dikr, W., & Abayechaw, D. (2022). Effects of phosphorus fertilizer on agronomic, grain yield and other physiological traits of some selected legume crops. J. Biol. Agric. Healthc, 12, 1-13.

9. Du, Z. Y., Qing-Hua, W. A. N. G., Fang-Chun, L. I. U., Hai-Lin, M. A., Bing-Yao, M. A., & SS, M. (2013). Movement of phosphorus in a calcareous soil as affected by humic acid. Pedosphere, 23(2), 229-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(13)60011-9
10. El-Bassiony, A.M., Fawzy, Z.F., Abd El-Baky, M.M. H., & Mahmoud, A. R. (2010). Response of snap bean plants to mineral fertilizers and humic acid application. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci, 6(2), 169-175.
11. El Sheikha, A.F., Allam, A.Y., Taha, M., & Varzakas, T. (2022). How does the addition of biostimulants affect the growth, yield, and quality parameters of the snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)? How is this reflected in its nutritional value?. Applied Sciences, 12(2), 776. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020776
12. Gabre, V. V., Venancio, W. S., Moraes, B. A., Furmam, F. D. G., Galvão, C. W., Gonçalves, D. R. P., & Etto, R. M. (2020). Multiple effect of different plant growth promoting microorganisms on beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crop. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 63(spe), e20190493. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-solo-2020190493
13. Halpern, M., Bar-Tal, A., Ofek, M., Minz, D., Muller, T., & Yermiyahu, U. (2015). The use of biostimulants for enhancing nutrient uptake. Advances in Agronomy, 130, 141-174.
14. Jahan, M. S., Hasan, M. M., & Rahman, M. A. (2024). Hormones and biostimulants in plants: physiological and molecular insights on plant stress responses. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, 1413659.
15. Kaçar, B. (2013). Bitki Besleme ve Toprak Verimliliği. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, Ankara.
16. Khaled, H., & Fawy, H. A. (2011). Effect of different levels of humic acids on the nutrient content, plant growth, and soil properties under conditions of salinity. Soil and Water Research, 6(1), 21. DOI:10.17221/4/2010-SWR
17. Kocira, A., Lamorska, J., Kornas, R., Nowosad, N., Tomaszewska, M., Leszczyńska, D., Kozłowicz, K., & Tabor, S. (2020). Changes in biochemistry and yield in response to biostimulants applied in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agronomy, 10(2), 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020189
18. Külahtaş, B. & Çokuysal B., 2016, Biyostimulantların sınıflandırılması ve Türkiye’deki durumu. Çukurova Tarım Gıda Bil. Der. 31(3): 185-200, 2016 (Özel Sayı)
19. Lichtenthaler, H. K., & Wellburn, A. R. (1983) Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. 603rd Meetıng, Lıverpool, 591-592.
20. Lynch, J., Läuchli, A., & Epstein, E. (1991). Vegetative growth of the common bean in response to phosphorus nutrition. Crop Science, 31(2), 380-387.
21. McLean EO. (1982). Soil pH and lime requirement. In: Page AL, editor. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. 2nd ed. Madison (WI): Wiley; p. 199–224.
22. Mertens D. (2005a). AOAC official method 922.02. Plants preparation of laboratory sample. In: Horwitz W, Latimer GW, editors. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed. Gaitherburg (MD): AOAC; p. 1–2.
23. Mertens D. (2005b). AOAC official method 975.03. In: Horwitz W, Latimer GW, editors. Metal in plants and pet foods. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed. Gaitherburg (MD): AOAC; p. 3–4.
24. Ndakidemi, P. A., Dakora, F. D., Nkonya, E. M., Ringo, D., & Mansoor, H. (2006). Yield and economic benefits of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and soybean (Glycine max) inoculation in northern Tanzania. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 46(4), 571-577.
25. Nelson, D.W., & Sommers E. (1982). Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeny DR, editor. Methods of soil analysis part 2. Agronomy monographs 9. Madison (WI): ASA and SSSA; p. 539–579.
26. Pal, K.K., Tilak, K.V.B.R., Saxena, A.K., Dey, R., & Singh, C.S., (2000). Antifungal characteristics of a fluorescent Pseudomonas strains involved in the biological control of Rhizoctonia solani. Microbiol Research, 155: 233-242.
27. Rawat, P., Das, S., Shankhdhar, D., & Shankhdhar, S. C. (2021). Phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms: mechanism and their role in phosphate solubilization and uptake. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 21(1), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00342-7
28. Rhoades JD. (1986). Soluble Salts. In: Klute A, editor. Soluble salts. Methods of soil analysis-part II. Agronomy Monograph No: 9. Madison (WI): ASA and SSSA; p. 167–179.
29. Romerio, R. S. (2000). Preliminary results on PGPR research at the Universidade federal de viçosa, Brazil. Fifth International PGPR Workshop, 29 October - 3 November, 2000, Cordoba-Argentina.
30. Shen, J., Yuan, L., Zhang, J., Li, H., Bai, Z., Chen, X., Zhang, W., & Zhang, F. (2011). Phosphorus dynamics: from soil to plant. Plant Physiology, 156(3), 997-1005.
31. Sinha, D., & Tandon, P. K. (2020). An overview of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium: Key players of nutrition process in plants. Sustainable Solutions for Elemental Deficiency and Excess in Crop Plants, 85-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8636-1_5
32. SPSS (2010) SPSS Inc. 18.0 base user’s guide. Chicago (IL), Prentice Hall.
33. Turuko, M., & Mohammed, A. (2014). Effect of different phosphorus fertilizer rates on growth, dry matter yield and yield components of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). World Journal of Agricultural Research, 2(3), 88-92. DOI:10.12691/wjar-2-3-1
34. Vikram, N., Sagar, A., Gangwar, C., Husain, R., & Kewat, R.N. (2022). Properties of humic acid substances and their effect in soil quality and plant health. In Humus and humic substances-recent advances. IntechOpen. . DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.105803
35. Wang, Y., Chen, Y.F., & Wu, W.H. (2021). Potassium and phosphorus transport and signaling in plants. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 63(1), 34-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13053
36. Wellburn, A. R., (1994) The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. Journal of Plant Physiology, 144(3), 307-313.
37. Xiong, L., Wang, P., Hunter, M. N., & Kopittke, P. M. (2018). Bioavailability and movement of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (HA-NPs) applied as a phosphorus fertiliser in soils. Environmental Science: Nano, 5(12), 2888-2898. DOI: 10.1039/C8EN00751A
38. Yahaya, S. M., Mahmud, A. A., Abdullahi, M., & Haruna, A. (2023). Recent advances in the chemistry of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium as fertilizers in soil: A review. Pedosphere, 33(3), 385-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedsph.2022.07.012
39. Zafar, M., Abbasi, M.K., Rahim, N., Khaliq, A., Shaheen, A., Jamil, M., & Shahid, M. (2011). Influence of integrated phosphorus supply and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on growth, nodulation, yield and nutrient uptake in Phaseolus vulgaris. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(74), 16781-16792.
40. Zewdie, T., & Hassen, E. (2021). Review on effects of phosphorus fertilizer rates on growth, yield components and yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Current Research in Food Science, 2(1), 34-39.