TR
EN
Behavioral response of Rhyzopertha dominica adults to wheat kernels treated with Beauveria bassiana conidia and mortality rate
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the reaction of Rhyzopertha dominica adults to treated-wheat kernels with Beauveria bassiana spores considering pest movement and mortality. The pest’s reaction to inactivated B. bassiana spores was also tested. Each experimental unit had two equal-sized of compartments without restriction of R. dominica adult movements to both sites. By filling each compartment with wheat kernels treated or untreated, different layouts were created using two compartments. Treatments included either active or inactivated B. bassiana conidia. In setup of two experiments, R. dominica adults were released in either one or both compartments. The distribution of insects and mortalities were recorded at the end of the experiments. R. dominica adults exhibited a marked avoidance behavior towards the presence of B. bassiana spores, reducing the total mortality from 95.00% to 68.75%. R. dominica adults showed the same response to inactivated B. bassiana spores, and could not differentiate between active and inactive spores. The effect of this behavior on the success of B. bassiana treatments depends on the application strategy: while non-homogeneous distribution may lead to reduced efficacy due to insects aggregating in untreated areas, the fungus's inherent repellency offers a strategic advantage for preventing initial infestations.
Keywords
References
- Abdel-Raheem, M. A., Ismail, I. A., Abdel Rahman, R. S., Farag, N. A., & Abdel Rahman, I. E. (2015). Entomopathogenic fungi, *Beauveria bassiana* (Bals.) and *Metarhizium anisopliae* (Metsch.) as biological control agents on some stored product insects. *Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 3*(6), 316–320.
- Athanassiou, C. G., & Palyvos, N. E. (2006). Laboratory evaluation of two diatomaceous earth formulations against *Blattisocius keegani* Fox (Mesostigmata, Ascidae) and *Cheyletus malaccensis* Oudemans (Prostigmata: Cheyletidae). *Biological Control, 38*, 350–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.04.007
- Barış, C. (2026). Investigation of mass production performance and virulence of some entomopathogenic fungal isolates and their single-spore strains against *Rhyzopertha dominica*. *Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 13*(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1713146
- Barış, C., & Er, M. K. (2025). Mortality effect of wettable powder formulations containing entomopathogenic fungal spores against some stored-product pests. *Turkish Journal of Entomology, 49*(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.16970/entoted.1599102
- Baverstock, J., Alderson, P. G., & Pell, J. K. (2005). *Pandora neoaphidis* transmission and aphid foraging behaviour. *Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 90*(1), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2005.05.009
- Baverstock, J., Roy, H. E., & Pell, J. K. (2010). Entomopathogenic fungi and insect behaviour: From unsuspecting hosts to targeted vectors. *BioControl, 55*(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-009-9238-5
- Bruetsch, T., Felden, A., Reber, A., & Chapuisat, M. (2014). Ant queens (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) are attracted to fungal pathogens during the initial stage of colony founding. *Myrmecological News, 20*, 71–76. https://iris.unil.ch/handle/iris/46136
- Cotes, B., Thöming, G., Amaya-Gómez, C. V., Novák, O., & Nansen, C. (2020). Root-associated entomopathogenic fungi manipulate host plants to attract herbivorous insects. *Scientific Reports, 10*(1), Article 22424. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80123-5
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Plant Protection (Other)
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
September 8, 2026
Submission Date
February 17, 2026
Acceptance Date
May 25, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 31 Number: 3
APA
İncir Öz, M., & Er, M. K. (2026). Behavioral response of Rhyzopertha dominica adults to wheat kernels treated with Beauveria bassiana conidia and mortality rate. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 31(3), 724-733. https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1891466
AMA
1.İncir Öz M, Er MK. Behavioral response of Rhyzopertha dominica adults to wheat kernels treated with Beauveria bassiana conidia and mortality rate. MKU. J. Agric. Sci. 2026;31(3):724-733. doi:10.37908/mkutbd.1891466
Chicago
İncir Öz, Merve, and Mehmet Kubilay Er. 2026. “Behavioral Response of Rhyzopertha Dominica Adults to Wheat Kernels Treated With Beauveria Bassiana Conidia and Mortality Rate”. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 31 (3): 724-33. https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1891466.
EndNote
İncir Öz M, Er MK (September 1, 2026) Behavioral response of Rhyzopertha dominica adults to wheat kernels treated with Beauveria bassiana conidia and mortality rate. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 31 3 724–733.
IEEE
[1]M. İncir Öz and M. K. Er, “Behavioral response of Rhyzopertha dominica adults to wheat kernels treated with Beauveria bassiana conidia and mortality rate”, MKU. J. Agric. Sci., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 724–733, Sept. 2026, doi: 10.37908/mkutbd.1891466.
ISNAD
İncir Öz, Merve - Er, Mehmet Kubilay. “Behavioral Response of Rhyzopertha Dominica Adults to Wheat Kernels Treated With Beauveria Bassiana Conidia and Mortality Rate”. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 31/3 (September 1, 2026): 724-733. https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1891466.
JAMA
1.İncir Öz M, Er MK. Behavioral response of Rhyzopertha dominica adults to wheat kernels treated with Beauveria bassiana conidia and mortality rate. MKU. J. Agric. Sci. 2026;31:724–733.
MLA
İncir Öz, Merve, and Mehmet Kubilay Er. “Behavioral Response of Rhyzopertha Dominica Adults to Wheat Kernels Treated With Beauveria Bassiana Conidia and Mortality Rate”. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 31, no. 3, Sept. 2026, pp. 724-33, doi:10.37908/mkutbd.1891466.
Vancouver
1.Merve İncir Öz, Mehmet Kubilay Er. Behavioral response of Rhyzopertha dominica adults to wheat kernels treated with Beauveria bassiana conidia and mortality rate. MKU. J. Agric. Sci. 2026 Sep. 1;31(3):724-33. doi:10.37908/mkutbd.1891466