Response of okra to water stress

Year 2019, Special Issue: 1st Int. Congress on Biosystems Engineering 2019, 313 - 319, 27.12.2019

Ali Unlukara Bilal Cemek

Abstract

Aims: The purpose of this study was to determine sensitivity of okra against water stress, and also examined plant growth, yield components, water consumption and water use efficiency under water stress conditions.
Methods and results: Different water amounts were applied to determine response of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Akköy 41) to water stress in a study conducted in Tokat/Turkey. The irrigation treatments consisted of the applications of 100%, 75% and 50% of depleted water from root zone of okra. The experiment was designed according to randomized block with three replications. Soil moisture along okra growing season was monitored by gravimetric method. Water consumption and fresh fruit production were found 664 mm and 28690 kg/ha, 596 mm and 24691 kg/ha and 506 mm and 20554 kg/ha for I100, I75 and I50 treatments, respectively. Fresh fruit yield and total dry biomass above ground were significantly affected from water stress but fruit numbers and fruit yield per plant, mean fruit weight, dry fruit yield, harvest index, irrigation water use efficiency and water use efficiency were not affected significantly.
Conclusions: Okra was found sensitive against water stress for fresh fruit yield with yield response factor of 1.22 while it was found tolerant for dry fruit yield with yield response factor of 0.71. Dry matter ratio of fruit increased from 15.1% for I100 to 18.0% for I50 treatment. It can be concluded from the results that okra under water stress promoted fruit yield against vegetative growth because of its increasing harvest index.
Significance and impact of the study: When okra grown under full irrigation conditions it should be marked as fresh to obtain higher profits. When okra exposed to water stress it should be marked after drying to prevent profit lost.

Keywords

Yield response factor, , abelmoschus esculentus, water regime

References

• Abd El-Kader AA, Shaaban SM, Abd El-Fattah MS (2010). Effect of irrigationlevels and organic compost on okra plants (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) grown insandy calcareous soil. Agric. Biol. J. North Am. 1 (3), 225–231.
• Abubaker BMA, Ahadi M, Shuang-En Y, Guang-Cheng S (2014). Different Irrigation Methods for Okra Crop Production under Semi-arid Conditions. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 3 (4): 787-794.
• Adekiya AO, Agbede TM, Aboyeji CM, Dunsin O (2017). Response of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) and soil properties to different mulch materials in different cropping seasons. Scientia Horticulturae, 217: 209-216.
• Çalişir S, Özcan M, Haciseferogullari H, Yildiz MU (2005). A study on some physicochemical properties of Turkey okra Hibiscus esculenta L. seeds. J. Food. Eng., 68, 73–78. Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (1986). Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33, Rome. pp 193.
• Düzyaman E (2005). Phenotypic diversity within a collection of distinct okra Abelmoschus esculentus cultivars derived from Turkish land races. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 52, 1019–1030.
• Echo (2003). Plant Information Sheet. N.F.T Meyers, USA. Retrieved August 23, 2019, from, http://echonet.org/.
• FAO (2019). Crop production statistics. Retrieved August 23, 2019, from, www.fao.org. Gopalan C, Rama Sastri BV, Balasubramanian SC (1989). Nutritive value of Indian foods. National Institute of Nutrition. ICMR, Hyderabad, India.
• İnan Y (1996). “Breeding report on the Denizli okra cultivar.” Rep. No.113, Atatürk Central Horticultural Research Institute, Yalova, Turkey.
• Martin FW, Rhodes A M, Ortiz M, Diaz F (1981). Variation in okra. Euphytica, 30, 697–705. MGM, 2019. Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü. Retrieved August 15, 2019, from, https://www.mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?k=A&m=TOKAT
• Oppong Danso E, Abenney-Mickson S, Sabi EB, Plauborg F, Abekoe M, Kugblenu YO, Jensen CR, Andersen MN (2015). Effect of different fertilization and irrigation methods on nitrogen uptake, intercepted radiation and yield of okra (Abelmoschus esculentum L.) grown in the Keta Sand Spit of Southeast Ghana. Agricultural Water Management, 147: 34-32.
• Panigrahi P, Sahu NN (2013). Evapotranspiration and yield of okra as affected by partial root-zone furrow irrigation. International Journal of Plant Production, 7 (1): 33-54.
• Siyal AA, Mashari AS, Bristow KL, van Genuchten MTh (2016). Altenative furrow irrigation can radically improve water productivity. Agricultural Water Management, 173: 55-60.
• Vural H, Eşiyok D, Duman İ (2000). Kültür Sebzeleri (Sebze Yetiştirme). Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Bahçe Bitkileri Bölümü, İzmir/Turkiye. 440 s.
• Ünlükara A, Kurunç A, Kesmez GD, Yurtseven E (2008). Growth and evapotranspiration of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) as influenced by salinity of irrigation water. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering-ASCE, 134 (2): 160-166.