Asi Nehrinin su kalite parametre düzeylerinin belirlenmesi

Year 2020, Volume: 25 Issue: 1, 1 - 9, 06.04.2020

Necat Ağca , Kemal Doğan

https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.585057

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’nin sınır aşan akarsularından
biri olan Asi Nehrinin su kalite parametre düzeylerinin belirlenmesi ve
bunların içme ve sulama suyu kalitesi açısından değerlendirilmesi
amaçlanmıştır.

Yöntem ve Bulgular: Bu çalışmada, Asi Nehrinin
Türkiye kısmında belirlenen 8 noktadan, dört farklı dönemde su örnekleri
alınmıştır. Alınan su örneklerinde pH, elektriksel iletkenlik (EC), eriyebilir
katyon (Na, K, Ca, Mg) ve eriyebilir anyon (Cl^-, SO₄, CO₃^-
ve HCO₃⁼) analizleri yapılmıştır. Ayrıca eriyebilir
katyon ve anyonlardan sodyum adsorpsiyon oranı (SAR), magnezyum oranı (MR),
toplam sertlik (TH) ve kalıcı bikarbonat (RSC) değerleri hesaplanmıştır.
Araştırma konusu su kaynaklarına ait bütün parametrelerin tanımlayıcı
istatistik analizleri (ortalama, en düşük ve en yüksek değerler, standart sapma,
varyasyon katsayısı, vb.) hesaplanmıştır. Su örneklerinin özellikleri
arasındaki ilişkileri araştırmak için korelasyon analizi ve örnekleme dönemleri
ve noktaları arasındaki farklılıkları açıklayabilmek için ise anova ve duncan
testleri yapılmıştır. Asi Nehir suyunda katyonların oransal bolluk
sıralaması çoktan aza doğru Mg>Na>Ca>K şeklinde, anyonların sıralaması
ise SO4>HCO₃>Cl>CO₃ şeklinde belirlenmiştir.
Amerikan tuzluluk laboratuvarı diyagramına göre, Asi Nehir suyunun kalite
sınıfı C₃S₁ olarak belirlenmiştir.

Genel Yorum: Yapılan varyans analiz
sonuçlarına göre; örnekleme noktaları arasında EC değerlerindeki farklılık
istatistiksel açıdan %5 düzeyinde önemli bulunmuştur. Diğer parametrelerdeki
farklılıklar ise istatistiksel açıdan önemli bulunamamıştır. Yine, örnekleme
dönemleri arasında ise pH, HCO₃ ve MR değerleri arasındaki farklılık
%1 düzeyinde önemli bulunmuştur.

Çalışmanın Önemi ve Etkisi: Asi nehir suyunu kullanırken
dikkatli olmak gerekir. Asi nehir suyu tuzluluk açısından çok tuzlu sular sınıfına
girmektedir. Bu su ancak iyi drenaj koşullarında ve tuzluluk kontrolü için özel
yönetim uygulamaları ile sulamada kullanılabilir.

Keywords

Asi nehri, su kalitesi, fiziko-kimyasal özellikler

Supporting Institution

Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırmalar Proje Koordinatörlüğü

Project Number

16580

Thanks

Bu çalışmaya maddi destek sağlayan (Proje No:16580) Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırmalar Proje Koordinatörlüğüne teşekkür ederiz.

Determination of water quality parameters of Asi River

Abstract

Aims:
In this study, it is aimed to determine water quality parameters of Asi River
that is one of the transboundary river of Turkey and to evaluate their quality
related to irrigation water quality.

Methods and Results:
In the research, water samples were
taken from section in Turkey of Asi River in four different periods end eighth
different points. Water samples were analyzed for pH, electrical conductivity
(EC), soluble cations (Na, K, Ca, Mg) and anions (Cl^-, SO₄,
CO₃^- and
HCO₃⁼). In
addition, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), magnesium ratio (MR), total hardness
(TH) and residual sodium carbonate (RSC) values were calculated from soluble
cations and anions. Descriptive statistics were applied for all parameters.
Correlation analyses were made to research relationships between water
properties. Anova and Duncan tests were used to explain differences between
sampling points and times. The order of relative abundance of major cations in
the Asi river water is in order Mg>Na>Ca>K. The order of the anions abundance
is SO₄>HCO₃^->Cl>CO₃ in
this research. According to the US salinity laboratory diagram, water quality
class of Asi river water was determined as C₃S₁.

Conclusions:
According to results of anova test,
the differences in EC values among the sampling point were found to be
statistically significant (p<0.05).
Differences of pH, HCO₃ and MR among the sampling periods values
were found significant at 0.01 level.

Significance and Impact of
the Study: : 
It must be careful when using Asi river water. Because, Asi river water
classified as high salinity water. This water can not be used on soils with
restricted drainage.

Keywords

Asi River, Water quality, physico-chemical properties

Project Number

16580

References

• Ağca N, Ödemiş B, Yalçin M (2009) Spatial and temporal variations of water quality parameters in Orontes river Hatay. Turkey. Fresenius. Envir. Bulletin. 18 (4): 457-460.
• Ağca N, Yalçin M, Ödemiş B (2006) Quality Determination of Some Water Sources in the Amik Plain. Hatay. 18. International Soil Meeting (ISM) on ‘Soil Sustaining Life of Earth. Menaging Soil and Technology’ May 22-26.2006. Şanlıurfa-Turkey Proceedings. Volume I.pp. 320-326.
• Ağca N, Doğan K, Karanlık S (2018) Amik ovasındaki yüzey sularında amonyum, nitrat, fosfor ve ağır metal kirliliğinin belirlenmesi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 23(2):197-203.
• Altunlu E (2002). Potential water resources of Hatay. Published in Has Pipe Company.
• Ayers R S, Westcot D W (1994) Water quality for agriculture. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 29, Rev. 1.
• Bilgin A, Konanç UM (2016) Evaluation of surface water quality and heavy metal pollution of Coruh River Basin (Turkey) by multivariate statistical methods. Environ Earth Sci. 75:1029.
• Chung SY, Venkatramanan S, Park N, Ramkumar T, Sujitha SB, Jonathan MP (2016) Evaluation of physico-chemical parameters in water and total heavy metals in sediments at Nakdong River Basin. Korea. Environ Earth Sci. 75:50.
• Eaton FM (1950) Significance of carbonates in irrigation water. Soil. Sci. 69: 123-133.
• Edet A, Ukpong A, Nganje T (2013) Hydrochemical studies of Cross River Basin (southeastern Nigeria) river systems using cross plots, statistics and water quality index. Environ Earth Sci, 70:3043-3056.
• Food Standards Agency (2003) Safe upper levels for vitamins and minerals Published by Food Standards Agency p 293-299 (ISBN 1-904026-11-7).
• Gupta S, Nayek S, Chakraborty D (2016) Hydrochamical evaluation of Rangit river, Sikkim, India: using Water Quality Index and multivariate statistics. Environ Earth Sci, 75:67.
• Isawi RHK, Almuktar SAAAN, Scholz M (2016) Monitoring and assesment of treated river. Rain. Gully pot and grey waters for irrigation of Capsicum annuum. Envir. Monit. Assess. 288:287.
• Ji X, Dahlgren RA, Zhang M (2016) Comparison of seven water quality assessment methods for the characterization and management of highly impaired river systems. Envir. Monit. Assess. 188-15.
• Jindal R, Sharma C (2011) Studies on water quality of Sutlej River araund Ludhiana with reference to physicochemical parameters. Envir. Monit. Assess. 174:417-425.
• Kumarasamy P, James RA, Dahms HU, Byeon WC, Ramesh R (2014) Multivariate water quality assessment from the Tamiraparani river basin. Soutern India. Envir. Earth. Sci.71:2441-2451.
• Ma G, Wang Y, Bao X, Hu Y, Liu Y, He L, Wang T, Meng F (2015) Nitrogen pollution characteristics and source analysis using the stable isotope tracing method in Ashi River, northeast China. Environ Earth Sci 73:4831-4839.
• Morse NB, Wollheim WM (2014) Climate variability masks the impacts of land use change on nutrient export in a suburbanizing watershed. Biogeochemistry, 121:45-59.
• Murphy J, Riley J P (1962) A modified single solution method for determination of phosphate in natural water. Analytica Chimica Acta, 27: 31–36.Nasrabadi T, Meadeh PA (2004) Groundwater quality assessment in southern parts of Tehran plain. Iran. Environ Earth Sci. 71(5):2077-2086
• Ödemiş B, Sangün MK, Büyüktaş D (2007) Temporal Variations in Quantity and Quality of Orontes River, Turkey. Asian Journal of Chemistry. 19(1):711-723.
• Özdilek HG, Sangün MK (2007) Monitoring Surface Water Quality of an International River (Asi River) During the 2006 Muslim Sacriface Holiday. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 19:701-705.
• Padmalal D, Remya SI, Jyothi SJ, Baijulal B, Babu KN, Baiju RS (2012) Water quality and dissolved inorganic Fluxes of N. P. SO4 and K of a small catchment river in the Coast of India. Envir. Monit. Assess. 184:1541-1557.
• Phung D, Huang C, Rutherford S, Dwirahmadi F, Chu C, Wang X, Nguyen M, Nguyen NH, DO CM, Nguyen TH, Dinh TAD (2015)Temporal and spatial assessment of river surface water quality using multivariate statistical tachniques: atudy in Can Tho City. a Mekong Delta area. Vietnam. Envir. Monit. Assess. 187:229.
• Purandara BK, Varadarajan N, Venkatesh B, Choubey VK (2012) Surface water quality evaluation and modeling of Ghataprabha River, Karnataka, India. Envir. Monit. Assess. 184:1371-1378.
• Rather MI, Rashid I, Shahi N, Murtaza KO, Hassan K, Yousuf AR, Romshoo SA (2016) Massive land system changes impact water quality of the Jhelum River Kashmir Himalaya. Envir. Monit. Assess. 188:185.
• Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. US Dep Agri. Handbook 60:147
• Samarghandi, M.R. Nouri, J., Mesdaghinia, A.R., Mahvi, A.H., Nasseri.S., Vaezi, F. (2007). Efficiency removal of phenol. lead and cadmium by means of UV/TİO2/H2O2 processes. International Journal of Envirmental Science & Teknology. 4(1):19-25.
• Singh P, Chaturvedi RK, Mishra A, Kumari L, Singh R, Pal DB, Giri DD, Singh NL, Tiwary D, Mishra PK (2015) Assessment of ground and surface water quality along river Varuna. Varanasi. India. Envir. Monit. Assess. 187:170.
• Singh KP, Malik A, Mohan D et al. (2004) Multivariate statistical techniques for the Evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality of Gomti River. India Water Research, 38:3980-3992.
• Singh KP, Basant N, Gupta S (2011) Support vector machines in water quality Management. Analytical Chimca Acta, 703:152-162.
• SKKY (2008) Su kirliliği kontrol yönetmeliği, Resmi Gazete No: 26786 (13 Şubat 2008).
• WHO (1997) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, vol 1. World Health Organization, Geneva
• WHO (2004) Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, Vol.1.Recommendation. World Health Organization, Geneva, ISBN 92 4 154638 7.
• Yu Y.J, Guan J, Ma YW, Yu SX, Guo HC, Bao LY (2010) Aquatic environmental quality variation in Lake Dianchi watershed. Procedia. Envir. Sciences, 2:76-81.
• Zeeshan M, Azeez PA (2016) Hydro-chemical characterization and quality assessment of a Western Himalayan river, Munawar Tawi, flowing through Rajouri district, Jammu and Kasmir, India. Environ Monit Assess 188:520.
• Zhang, Y., Sillanpää, M., Li, C., Guo, J., Qu, B., Kang, S. (2015). River water quality across the Himalayan regions: elemental concentrations in headwaters of Yarlung Tsangbo, Indus and Ganges River. Envir Earth Sci, 73: 4151-4163.