François Laruelle ve (Standart Olmayan) İletişim

Year 2018, Volume: 5 Issue: 1 - Philosophy of Communication, 15 - 30, 15.06.2018

Philippe Theophanidis

https://doi.org/10.17572/mj2018.1.1530

Abstract

İletişim ve medya alanlarında François Laruelle’in çalışmasından pek sık söz edilmez. Bu araştırma notları, bu kesişimin üç noktasının ana hatlarını çıkarmayı önerir. İlk olarak, Laruelle’in özellikle iletişim üzerine yazdığı kısa bir deneme ele alınacaktır. Söz konusu denemeye hızlıca bir genel bakışın yanı sıra, felsefe için olmayan-felsefe neyse, iletişim için de –pek çok yazar tarafından dile getirildiği gibi- bir modelin halihazırda varolduğu öne sürülmektedir. Bu model “standart olmayan iletişim” olarak ifade edilmiştir. Bu noktadan sonra çalışma,  standart olmayan iletişimin Laruelle’in olmayan-felsefesi ile kesiştiği, iki ilave yol önerisiyle devam etmektedir. İlk kesişim, standart olmayan iletişimin kendisinin dışında hiçbir şeyle iletişim kurmadığı gerçeğinde yatmaktadır. İkinci kesişimdeyse standart olmayan iletişim, iki fail arasında yer almaktan çok bu failliğin en başta nasıl meydana geldiğiyle ilişkilidir.

Keywords

iletişim, Laruelle, felsefe, ifade edilemezlik, medya, topluluk

François Laruelle and (Non-Standard) Communication

Abstract

The work of François Laruelle is not often mentioned in the fields of communication and media studies. Those research notes propose to outline three points of intersection. The first point is a short essay Laruelle wrote specifically about communication. Alongside a brief overview of this essay, it is suggested that a model already exists –shared by various authors– that could be for communication what non-philosophy is for philosophy. This model is dubbed “non-standard communication”. The notes proceed to offer two additional ways in which this non-standard communication intersects with Laruelle’s non-philosophy. The first intersection is found in the fact that non-standard communication does not communicate anything other than itself. The second intersection has to do with the fact that non-standard communication does not take place between two agents but instead is how agency occurs in the first place.

Keywords

communication, Laruelle, philosophy, incommunicability, media, community

References

• Agamben, G. (1993). The Coming Community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.
• Agamben, G. (2004). The Open: Man and Animal. Translated by Kevin Attell. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Aristotle. (1986). On the Soul. Translated by W.S. Hett. Aristotle in Twenty-Three Volumes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Aristotle. (2006). The “Art” of Rhetoric. Translated by John Henry Freese. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
• Bataille, G. (1988). Inner Experience. Translated by Leslie Anne Boldt. Albany: State University of New York Press.
• Besnier, J.M. (1988). La politique de l’impossible: l’intellectuel entre révolte et engagement. Paris: La Découverte.
• Bizet, F. (2007). Une communication sans échange: Georges Bataille critique de Jean Genet. Genève: Droz.
• Blanchot, M. (2009). The unavowable community. Barrytown, N.Y.: Station Hill, 2009.
• Choukah, S., and T, Philippe. (2016). “Emergence and Ontogenetics: Towards a Communication without Agent.” Social Science Information 55, no. 3 (September 1, 2016): 286–99.
• Collier, P.J. (1975). “Georges Bataille: The Theory and Practice of Communication.” Proefschrift University of London, 1975.
• Craig, R. T. (1999). “Communication Theory as a Field.” Communication Theory 9, no. 2 (May 1, 1999): 119–61.
• Derrida, J. (1994). Given time. I, Counterfeit money. Translated by Peggy Kamuf. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• ECREA Philosophy of Communication. (2015). “Models of Communication: Philosophical and Theoretical Perspectives.” ECREA Philosophy of Communication, 2015. Access March 10, 2018 http://philosophyofcommunication.eu/events/models-of-communication-philosophical-and-theoretical-perspectives/.
• Esposito, R. (2010). Communitas: The Origin and Destiny of Community. Translated by Timothy Campbell. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Galloway, A. R. (2018). “French Theory Today.” Culture and Communication, 2010a. Access March 10, 2018 http://cultureandcommunication.org/galloway/FTT/.
• Galloway, A. R. (2010). “François Laruelle, or The Secret.” In French Theory Today – An Introduction to Possible Futures, Pamphlet No. 5, 3–22. New York: The Public School New York/Erudio Editions.
• Galloway, A. R., E. Thacker, and M. Wark. (2014). Excommunication: Three Inquiries in Media and Mediation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Gratton, P., and M. Morin, (2015). eds. The Nancy Dictionary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Krämer, S. (2015). Medium, Messenger, Transmission: An Approach to Media Philosophy. Translated by Anthony Enns. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
• Laruelle, F. (1978). “Pour Une Linguistique Active (La Notion de Phonèse).” Revue Philosophique de La France et de l’Etranger 168, no. 4 (1978): 419–31. Translated
• Laruelle, F. (1987). “La Vérité Selon Hermès. Théorème Sur Le Secret et La Communication.” Analecta Husserliana XXII (1987): 397–401.
• Laruelle, F. (1999). “A Summary of Non-Philosophy.” PLI, The Warwick Journal of Philosophy 8 (1999): 138–48.
• Laruelle, F. (2009). “Le Spectre de La Non-Philosophie.” Organisation Non-philosophique Internationale, May 17, 2009. Accessed : March 10, 2018 http://web.archive.org/web/20170428115716/http://www.onphi.net/accueil/.
• Laruelle, F. (2010). “The Truth According to Hermes: Theorems on the Secret and Communication.” Translated by Alexander R. Galloway. Parrhesia, no. 9 (2010): 18–22b.
• Laruelle, F. (2010). Philosophies of Difference: A Critical Introduction to Non-Philosophy. Translated by Rocco Gangle. New York: Continuum.
• Laruelle, F. (2013). Dictionary of Non-Philosophy. Translated by Taylor Adkins. Minneapolis: Univocal.
• Laruelle, F. (2013b). “Toward an Active Linguistics (The Notion of Phonesis).” Blog. Translated by Taylor Adkins. Speculative Heresy, September 3, 2013b. Accessed: June 4, 2018 https://speculativeheresy.wordpress.com/2013/09/03/translation-of-f-laruelles-toward-an-active-linguistics/.
• Laruelle, F. (2015). “Les deux sources de l’éthique en régime technologique.” Philosophical Anthropology 1, no. 1 (2015): 18–27.
• Laruelle, F. (2016).Theory of identities. Translated by Alyosha Edlebi. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Laruelle, F. (2017). Principles of Non-Philosophy. Translated by Nicola Rubczak and Anthony Paul Smith. London: Bloomsburry.
• Lasswell, H. D. (1971). “The Structure and Function of Communication in Society.” In The Process and Effects of Mass Communication, edited by Wilbur Lang Schramm and Donald F Roberts, 84–99. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
• Libertson, J. (1982). Proximity, Levinas, Blanchot, Bataille and Communication. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
• Manzini, F. (2010). “Verum index sui et falsi : de Spinoza à Boyle (à Aristote).” Archives de Philosophie Tome 73, no. 4 (December 1, 2010): 741–44.
• Mitchell, A. J, and J. Kemp Winfree, (2009). eds. The Obsessions of Georges Bataille: Community and Communication. Albany: SUNY Press.
• Mullarkey, J., and A. P. Smith, (2012). eds. Laruelle and Non-Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Nancy, J. (1991). The Inoperative Community. Edited by Peter Connor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Nancy, J. (1993). “The Decision of Existence.” In The Birth to Presence, translated by Brian Holmes, 82–109. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.
• Nancy, J. (2000). Being Singular Plural. Translated by Robert D Richardson and Anne Elizabeth O’Byrne. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Nancy, J. (2002). “L’Intrus.” Translated by Susan Hanson. CR: The New Centennial Review 2, no. 3 (December 19, 2002): 1–14.
• Sapienza, Z. S., Narayanan Iyer, and A. S. Veenstra. (2015). “Reading Lasswell’s Model of Communication Backward: Three Scholarly Misconceptions.” Mass Communication and Society 18, no. 5 (September 3, 2015): 599–622.
• Shannon, C. E. (1948). “A Mathematical Theory of Communication.” Bell Systems Technical Journal 27 (1948): 379–423.
• Spinoza, B. de. (1844). Benedicti de Spinoza Opera quae supersunt onmia. Leipzig: Tauchnitz.
• Spinoza, B. de. (1889). The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza: De Intellectus Emendatione. Ethica. Correspondence. (Abridged). Translated by R.H.W. Elwes. London: George Bell And Sons.
• Thacker, E. (2010). “Mystique and Mysticism.” In French Theory Today. An Introduction to Possible Futures, edited by Alexander R Galloway, 24–29. New York: The Public School New York/Erudio Editions.
• Watkin, W. (2014). Agamben and Indifference: A Critical Overview. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Watzlawick, P., J.H. Beavin, and D. D. Jackson. (1967). Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies, and Paradoxes. New York: Norton.