ULUSAL GÜVENLİK VE SOSYAL MEDYA: FIRSATLAR VE TEHDİTLER

Abstract

Akıllı telefonun icat edilmesinden sonra kişisel verilerin paylaşılmasıyla sanal ortamda üretilen veri çok büyük boyutlara ulaşmıştır. Twitter, Facebook ve Youtube gibi uygulamalar aracıları ortadan kaldırarak vatandaşların seslerini daha kolay duyurmasına yardımcı olmakta ve kitlelerin hareketlendirilmesini sağlayarak siyasal katılımı artırmaktadır. Ayrıca bu uygulamalar kriz durumlarına acil müdahalede, kamu politikası süreçlerinde taleplerin duyurulmasında ve kurumların kamuoyu gözündeki imajlarının iyileştirmelerinde kullanılmaktadırlar.  Buna karşın sosyal medya üzerinden yapılan bilgi savaşları ulusal güvenliği ve istikrarı etkileyecek son derece önemli sonuçlara yol açmaktadır. Sosyal medya uygulamalarının kamu yönetimine faydaları ve tehditleri gün geçtikçe artmaktadır.   Kamu bürokrasisinin geleneksel dikey yapılanmasıyla çelişkili de olsa resmî kurumların sosyal medya stratejisine sahip olması fırsatları değerlendirmek ve tehditlerin farkına varıp onlardan kaçınmak için önemlidir.  

Bu çalışmada öncelikle kamu yönetiminde büyük veri madenciliği, öğrenen makineler ve sosyal medyayla ilgili temel kavramlar açıklanmıştır. Kamu yönetiminde sosyal medya araçlarının ve bu platformlar üzerinden üretilen verinin kullanımına ilişkin tehditler, bu araçların ve verinin getirdiği fırsatlar incelenmiştir. Bu amaçla Emniyet Genel Müdürlüğü’ne ait resmi Twitter hesabı incelenmiştir. Veriler Twitter Public API üzerinden R programlama dili kullanılarak derlenmiştir. Verilerin çözümlenmesinde R programlama dilinden yararlanılmıştır. Çözümlemeler sonucunda ulusal güvenliğin ve istikrarın sağlanması için alınabilecek önlemler hakkında önerilerde bulunulmuştur

Keywords

• Sosyal Medya,Güvenlik,Twitter,Sosyal Ağ

References

1. Adrews, E. (2018). The Science Behind Cambridge Analytica: Does Psychological Profiling Work? Geliş tarihi 13 Nisan 2019, gönderen Stanford Graduate School of Business website: https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/science-behind-cambridge-analytica-does-psychological-profiling-work
2. Askonas, J. (2019). How Tech Utopia Fostered Tyranny. The New Atlantis, 3-13.
3. Bakan, S., & Şahin, S. (2018). ULUSLARARASI GÜVENLİK YAKLAŞIMLARININ TARİHSEL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ VE YENİ TEHDİTLER. 18.
4. Bashyakarla, V. (2018). France: Data Violations in Recent Elections - Our Data Our Selves. Geliş tarihi 27 Mart 2019, gönderen Tactical Technology Collective website: https://ourdataourselves.tacticaltech.org/posts/overview-france/
5. Benoit, K. (2019). quanteda: Quantitative Analysis of Textual Data (Versiyon 0.99.22) [R]. Geliş tarihi gönderen http://quanteda.io
6. Beres, D. (2019, Şubat 20). How Spotify manipulates your emotions and sells your data. Geliş tarihi 15 Nisan 2019, gönderen Big Think website: https://bigthink.com/technology-innovation/is-spotify-spying-on-you
7. Cadwalladr, C. (2017, Temmuz 5). The great British Brexit robbery: how our democracy was hijacked | Technology | The Guardian. The Guardian. Geliş tarihi gönderen https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy
8. Chen, X., Wang, Y., Agichtein, E., & Wang, F. (2015). A Comparative Study of Demographic Attribute Inference in Twitter. 4.

9. Christian, B. (2012, Nisan 26). The A/B Test: Inside the Technology That’s Changing the Rules of Business. Wired, 20(5). Geliş tarihi gönderen https://www.wired.com/2012/04/ff-abtesting/
10. Christl, W. (2017). Corporate Surveillance in Everyday Life. 93.
11. Condliffe, J. (2017). Fake news is everywhere. Why? Because it’s unbelievably cheap. Geliş tarihi 27 Şubat 2019, gönderen MIT Technology Review website: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/608105/fake-news-is-unbelievably-cheap/
12. Cookie Central. (t.y.). What Went Wrong? Geliş tarihi 27 Mart 2019, gönderen http://www.cookiecentral.com/cookie5.htm
13. Cookiebot. (t.y.). Cookie consent | How to get valid consent for your website. Geliş tarihi 27 Mart 2019, gönderen Cookiebot website: https://www.cookiebot.com/en/cookie-consent/
14. Corner, J. (2017). Fake news, post-truth and media–political change. Media, Culture & Society, 39(7), 1100-1107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717726743
15. Digeser, P. (1992). The Fourth Face of Power. The Journal of Politics, 54(4), 977-1007. https://doi.org/10.2307/2132105
16. European Commission. (2018, Mayıs). 2018 Reform of EU Data Protection Rules [Text]. Geliş tarihi 26 Şubat 2019, gönderen https://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/justice-and-fundamental-rights/data-protection/2018-reform-eu-data-protection-rules_en
17. Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777-795.
18. Froio, C., & Ganesh, B. (2018). The transnationalisation of far right discourse on Twitter. European Societies, 0(0), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2018.1494295
19. Gebru, T., Krause, J., Wang, Y., Chen, D., Deng, J., Aiden, E. L., & Fei-Fei, L. (2017). Using deep learning and Google Street View to estimate the demographic makeup of neighborhoods across the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(50), 13108-13113. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700035114
20. Gilani, Z., Farahbakhsh, R., & Crowcroft, J. (2017). Do Bots impact Twitter activity? Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion - WWW ’17 Companion, 781-782. https://doi.org/10.1145/3041021.3054255Google. (2019). Fighting disinformation across our products. Geliş tarihi gönderen https://www.blog.google/around-the-globe/google-europe/fighting-disinformation-across-our-products/
21. Hern, A. (2019, Ocak 28). Facebook to create “war room” to fight fake news, Nick Clegg says. The Guardian. Geliş tarihi gönderen https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/jan/28/facebook-war-room-fight-fake-news-nick-clegg-eu-elections-dublin-operations-centre
22. Hootsuite. (2017, Temmuz 10). A/B Testing on Social Media: How to Do it with Tools You Already Have. Geliş tarihi 27 Mart 2019, gönderen Hootsuite Social Media Management website: https://blog.hootsuite.com/social-media-ab-testing/
23. I Side With. (2017). Seçimler, siyasi konular, adayların ve anket veriler için Amerika’nın en popüler oylama kılavuzu. Geliş tarihi 14 Nisan 2019, gönderen iSideWith website: https://www.isidewith.com/tr/
24. Jiang, S., Martin, J., & Wilson, C. (2019). Who’s the Guinea Pig? Investigating Online A/B/n Tests in-the-Wild. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 201–210. ACM.
25. King, G., Lam, P., & Roberts, M. E. (2017). Computer-Assisted Keyword and Document Set Discovery from Unstructured Text: KEYWORD AND DOCUMENT SET DISCOVERY. American Journal of Political Science, 61(4), 971-988. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12291
26. Levin, S. (2018, Mayıs 14). Facebook suspends 200 apps as part of investigation into data misuse. The Guardian. Geliş tarihi gönderen https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/may/14/facebook-apps-suspended-privacy-scandal-cambridge-analytica
27. Li, Y., Yang, L., Xu, B., Wang, J., & Lin, H. (2019). Improving User Attribute Classification with Text and Social Network Attention. Cognitive Computation, 11(4), 459-468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-019-9624-y
28. Liu, Y., Cheng, D., Pei, T., Shu, H., Ge, X., Ma, T., … Xu, L. (2019). Inferring gender and age of customers in shopping malls via indoor positioning data. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 2399808319841910. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319841910
29. LIWC | Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. (2018, Mart 9). Geliş tarihi 09 Mart 2018, gönderen https://liwc.wpengine.com/
30. Margetts, H. (2019). 9. Rethinking Democracy with Social Media. The Political Quarterly, 90(S1), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12574
31. Matney, L. (2019, Ocak). Twitter testing ‘Original Tweeter’ tag to distinguish who started a thread. Geliş tarihi 20 Şubat 2019, gönderen TechCrunch website: http://social.techcrunch.com/2019/01/23/twitter-testing-original-tweeter-tag-to-distinguish-who-started-a-thread/
32. Mayer, J. R., & Mitchell, J. C. (2012). Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology. 2012 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 413-427. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2012.47
33. Meyer, D., Dimitriadou, E., Hornik, K., Weingessel, A., & Leisch, F. (2017). e1071: Misc Functions of the Department of Statistics, Probability Theory Group (Versiyon 1.6-8) [R]. Geliş tarihi gönderen https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=e1071
34. Nguyen, D., Gravel, R., Trieschnigg, D., & Meder, T. (2013). “ How Old Do You Think I Am?” A Study of Language and Age in Twitter. ICWSM.
35. Nielsen, N. (2018, Mart 28). Brexit vote manipulated, says data whistleblower. Geliş tarihi 26 Şubat 2019, gönderen https://euobserver.com/justice/141470
36. Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. (2019, Ocak 25). Opinion | Why Do People Fall for Fake News? The New York Times. Geliş tarihi gönderen https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/19/opinion/sunday/fake-news.html
37. Rao, D., & Yarowsky, D. (2010). Detecting Latent User Properties in Social Media. 7.
38. Ratkiewicz, J., Conover, M. D., Meiss, M., Gonçalves, B., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. M. (2011). Detecting and tracking political abuse in social media. Fifth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.
39. Sap, M., Park, G., Eichstaedt, J., Kern, M., Stillwell, D., Kosinski, M., … Schwartz, H. A. (2014). Developing age and gender predictive lexica over social media. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 1146–1151.
40. Segal, S. (2017, Ağustos 15). Why A/B Testing Should Be Your Next Step on Social Media. Geliş tarihi 27 Mart 2019, gönderen The Oktopost Blog website: https://www.oktopost.com/blog/ab-testing-social-media/
41. Tirab, T. A. (2017). Küreselleşme Asrında Ulusal Güvenlik Perspektifinden Medya-Güvenlik İlişkisi ve Topluma Yansımaları. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, 13(24), 113-151. https://doi.org/10.17752/guvenlikstrtj.356952
42. Torun, A. (2012). ULUSAL GÜVENLİK VE KÜRESELLEŞME: TÜRKİYE'NİN ULUSAL GÜVENLİK POLİTİKASININ DÖNÜŞÜMÜNDE KÜRESELLEŞMENİN ROLÜ. ( (National Security and Globalization: The Role of Globalization in The Transformation of Turkey's National Security Policy). Geliş tarihi gönderen https://www.academia.edu/35668756/ULUSAL_G%C3%9CVENL%C4%B0K_VE_K%C3%9CRESELLE%C5%9EME_T%C3%9CRK%C4%B0YEN%C4%B0N_ULUSAL_G%C3%9CVENL%C4%B0K_POL%C4%B0T%C4%B0KASININ_D%C3%96N%C3%9C%C5%9E%C3%9CM%C3%9CNDE_K%C3%9CRESELLE%C5%9EMEN%C4%B0N_ROL%C3%9C._National_Security_and_Globalization_The_Role_of_Globalization_in_The_Transformation_of_Turkeys_National_Security_Policy_Twitter Public Policy. (2017, Şubat 28). Update: Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election. Geliş tarihi 26 Şubat 2019, gönderen https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2017/Update-Russian-Interference-in-2016--Election-Bots-and-Misinformation.htmlVanian, J. (2018). Facebook, Twitter Take New Steps to Combat Fake News and Manipulation. Fortune. Geliş tarihi gönderen http://fortune.com/2018/01/19/facebook-twitter-news-feed-russia-ads/
43. Varga, K. (2018). Why European Campaigns Should Invest in Social Media Listening. Geliş tarihi 27 Mart 2019, gönderen Campaigns&Elections website: https://www.campaignsandelections.com/europe/why-european-campaigns-should-invest-in-social-media-listening
44. Wachter, S. (2018). The GDPR and the Internet of Things: a three-step transparency model. Law, Innovation and Technology, 10(2), 266-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2018.1527479
45. Wang, Z., Hale, S., Adelani, D. I., Grabowicz, P., Hartman, T., FlÃ\Pck, F., & Jurgens, D. (2019). Demographic Inference and Representative Population Estimates from Multilingual Social Media Data. The World Wide Web Conference, 2056–2067. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313684
46. Whittaker, Ja. (2018). Thousands of Twitter accounts that spread fake news during the 2016 election are still active today, say researchers. Geliş tarihi 27 Şubat 2019, gönderen TechCrunch website: http://social.techcrunch.com/2018/10/04/thousands-of-twitter-accounts-that-spread-fake-news-during-the-2016-election-are-still-active-today-say-researchers/
47. Who Should You Vote For. (2017). UK 2017 General Election Quiz. Geliş tarihi 14 Nisan 2019, gönderen Who Should You Vote For? website: https://www.whoshouldyouvotefor.com/
48. Zhang, J., Hu, X., Zhang, Y., & Liu, H. (2016). Your Age Is No Secret: Inferring Microbloggers’ Ages via Content and Interaction Analysis. 10.