Soundscape1 Çalışmalarına Etnomüzikolojiden Bir Bakış

Abstract

nomüzikoloji disiplini içinde ses ve soundscape kavramları genellikle tını, bir müzik türünün karakteristik özellikleri, belli bir bölgeyi ya da toplumu tanımlayan müzikler gibi anlamlar ifade ederek kullanılagelmiştir. Oysa analitik perspektiflerini Soundscape Okulu’yla doğrudan ilişki içinde geliştiren etnomüzikologlar, sesleri (müzikleri, dili, sessizlikleri, çevresel sesleri ve gürültüleri) bir bütünün ilişki içindeki parçaları olarak görür ve sessel pratikleri bu ilişkisellik içinde inceler. Sesin merkeze alındığı bu çalışmalar etnomüzikoloji içinde müzik kavramının sınırları ve sorunları ile ilgili yeni bir tartışmanın doğmasına da öncülük etmiştir. Bu makalede etnomüzikolojinin soundscape çalışmalarına ilgisinin nasıl başladığı ve ana hatlarıyla nasıl geliştiği özetlenmekte ve müzik kavramıyla ilgili bir tartışma önerisi sunulmaktadır

Keywords

• Soundscape, Akustemoloji , Etnomüzikoloji, Müzik

An Ethnomusicological Perspective to Soundscape Studies

Abstract

Ethnomusicologists generally use the concepts of sound and soundscape referring to timbre, the sonic characteristics of a specific music genre, or the musical characteristics of a region or society. However, ethnomusicologists who draw their analytical perspectives from the Soundscape School investigate the sounds (musics, languages, silences, environmental sounds and noises) as related parts of a whole, and analyze the sonic practices in terms of these relations. These works have lead to a further discussion in ethnomusicology on the limits and problems of music as a concept. This paper aims to briefly trace the history of the relationship of ethnomusicology to soundscape studies and raises questions about the boundaries of music concept

Keywords

• Soundscape, Acoustemology, Ethnomusicology, Music

References

1. Abé, M. (2016). Sounding Against Nuclear Power in Post- 3. 11 Japan: Resonances of Silence and Chindon-ya. Ethnomusicology 60, no. 2, 233-262.
2. Abels, B. (Ed.). (2011). Austronesian Soundscapes: Performing Arts inOoceania and Southeast
3. Asia. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis
4. University of Minnesota Press. Basso, E. (1981). A “Musical View of the Universe”: Kalapalo Myth and Ritual as
5. Religious Performance. The Journal of American Folklore 94, no.373, 272-291. Blacking, J. (2000). How Musical is Man? Seattle, London: University of Washington Press.
6. Corbin, A. (1998). Village Bells: Sound and Meaning in the 19th-century French Countryside
7. (European Perspectives). New York: Columbia University Press. Daughtry, M. (2015). Listening to War: Sound, Music, Trauma and Survival in Wartime Iraq.
8. New york: Oxford University Press. Feld, S. (1984). Sound Structure as Social Structure. Ethnomusicology 28, no. 3, 409.

9. Feld, S. (1990). Sound and Sentiment: Birds, Weeping, Poetics and Song in Kaluli
10. Expression. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Feld, S. (1996). Waterfalls of Song: An Acoustemology of Place Resounding in Bosavi, Papua
11. New Guinea. In S. Feld & K.H. Basso (Eds.), Senses of Place (pp.91-135). Santa Fe: School of Ame- rican Research Press. Feld, S. (2015). Acoustemology. In D. Novak & M. Sakakeeny (Eds.), Keywords in Sound (pp. 22). Durham, Lodon: Duke University Press.
12. Feld, S., Brenneis, D. (2004). Doing Anthropology in Sound. American Ethnologist 31, no. 4, 474.
13. Finchum-sung, H.V. (2012). Ensembles in the Contemporary Korean Soundscape: Foreword.
14. The Worls of Music 1, no.1, 7-13. Hammond, N. (2010). The Gendered Sound of South Africa: Karen Zoid and The Performance of Nationalism in the New South Africa. Yearbook for Traditional Music 42, 1-20.
15. Jarviluoma, H., Uimonnen, H., Vikman, N., Kytö, M. (Eds.) (2009).Acoustic Environments in
16. Change. Tampere: TAMK University of Applied Sciences. Johnson, H. (2007). 'Happy Diwali ' Performance, Multicultural Soundscapes and Interventi- on in Aotearoa/NewZealand. Ethnomusicology Forum 16, no. 1, 71-94.
17. Jurková, Z. (2014). Prague Soundscapes. Prague: Karolinum Press.
18. Kelman, A. Y. (2010). Rethinking the Soundscape. A Critical Genealogy of a Key
19. Term in Sound Studies. Senses & Society 5, no. 2, 212–234. Kytö, M. (2011). ‘We Are the Rebellious Voice of the Terraces, We Are Çarşı’: Constructing a
20. Football Supporter Group Through Sound. Soccer & Society 12, no. 1, 77-93. Madrid, A. L. (2009). Sounds of the Modern Nation: Music, Culture, and Ideas in Post
21. Revolutionary Mexico. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Merriam, A. (1964). The Anthropology of Music. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
22. Özgün, E. Ş. (2012). Sounds of Political Actions in the Streets of Istanbul. (Yayınlanmamış Dok- tora Tezi, İTÜ).
23. Özgün, Ş., Beşiroğlu, Ş.Ş, Reigle, R. (2013). İstanbul’un Sesleri: Soundscape Çalışmaları ve Politik Eylemin Sessel İfade Biçimleri. Porte Akademik 8, 239-249.
24. Ramnarine, T. K. (2009) Acoustemology, Indigeneity, and Joik in Valkeapää's Symphonic Acti- vism: Views from Europe's Arctic Fringes for Environmental Ethnomusicology. Ethnomusicology , no. 2, 187-217.
25. Roseman, M. (1991). Healing Sounds from the Malaysian Rainforest. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26. Samuels, D. W., Meintjes, L., Ochoa, A. M., Porcello, T. (2010). Soundscapes: Toward a Soun- ded Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 39, 329-345.
27. Schafer, R. M. (1969). The New Soundscape: A Handbook for the Modern Music Teacher. Onta- rio: Berandol Music Limited.
28. Schafer, R. M. (Ed.). (1974). The Vancouver Soundscape. Vancouver: ARC Publications.
29. Schafer, R. M. (Ed.). (1977a). Five Village Soundscapes. Vancouver: ARC Publications.
30. Schafer, R. M. (1977b). The Tuning of the World . New York: Knopf.
31. Schafer, R. M. (Ed.). (2009). Five Village Soundscapes. Tampere: TAMK University of Applied Sciences.
32. Seeger, A. (1988). Why Suya Sing. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
33. Shelemay, K. K. (2001). Soundscapes: Exploring Music in A Changing World. New york & Lon- don: W. W. Norton Company.
34. Simonett, H. (2014). Envisioned, Ensounded, Enacted: Sacred Ecology and Indigenous Musi- cal Experience in Yoreme Ceremonies of Northwest Mexico. Ethnomusicology 58, no. 1, 110-132.
35. Truax, B. (1978). Handbook for Acoustic Ecology. Vancouver: ARC Publications
36. Truax, B. (1984). Acoustic Communication. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.
37. Truax, B. (2007). Sound in Context: Acoustic Communication and Soundscape Research at
38. Simon Fraser University. http://wfae.proscenia.net/library/articles/truax_SFUniversity.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir. Turnbull, C. M. (1957) Music of the Ituri Forest. LP. New York: Folkways
39. Turnbull, C. M. (1961a). Music of the Rainforest Pygmies. LP. New York: Lyri- chord.
40. Turnbull, C. M. (1961b) The Forest People. New York: Simon and Schuster
41. Uimonen, H. (2009). Soundscape Studies and Auditory Cognition. In , H. Jarviluoma, H.
42. Uimonnen, N. Vikman, M. Kytö (Eds.), Acoustic Environments in Change (pp. 34-56). Tampere: TAMK University of Applied Sciences. Veal, M. E. (2007). Dub: Soundscapes and Shattered Songs in Jamaican Reggae. Wesleyan University Press.
43. Willoughby, H. (2000). The Sound of Han: P’ansori, Timbre and Korean Ethos of Pain and Suffering. Yearboook for Traditional Music 32, 17-30.
44. Wong, D. (2014). Sound, Silence, Music: Power. Ethnomusicology 58, no. 2, 347-353.
45. World Soundscape Project. (1974). Soundscapes of Canada. World Soundscape Project, Sonic Re- search Studio, Department of Communication Studies, Simon Fraser University. Canadian Bro- adcast Corporation (audiorecording).
46. Yoichi, Y. (1997). Songs of Spirits: An Ethnography of Sounds in a Papua New Guinea Society.
47. Boroko, PNG : Institute of Papua New Guinea Studies.