Balkanlarda Transfer Fiyatlaması

Abstract

Bu çalışma Balkan ülkelerindeki transfer fiyatlaması uygulamalarındaki gelişmeleri ve farklılıkları incelemektedir. Transfer fiyatlaması konusunda OECD’nin transfer fiyatlaması yönetmelikleri belirleyici bir rol oynamaktadır. Bu nedenle, Bulgaristan, Yunanistan, Romanya, Makedonya, Arnavutluk, Sırbistan ve Türkiye’deki transfer fiyatlaması uygulamaları OECD’nin transfer fiyatlaması yönetmeliklerine uygun olarak karşılaştırılmıştır. Balkan ülkeleri arasında transfer fiyatlaması konusunda bir birliktelik olmadığı, transfer fiyatlaması yönetmeliklerinin bazılarının OECD’nin yönetmelikleri ile uyumlu olmadığı çalışmanın bulguları arasındadır.

Keywords

• Transfer fiyatlaması,balkan ülkeleri

References

1. Cook, P.W. (1955). Decentralization and the Transfer Price Problem. Journal of Business. pp. 87-94.
2. Dean, J. (1955). Decentralization and Intra-Company Pricing. Harvard Business Review. pp. 65-74.
3. Hirshleifer, J. (1956). On the Economics of Transfer Pricing. The Journal of Business. 29(3), pp. 172-184.
4. Marques, M. & Pinho, C. (2016). Is Transfer Pricing Strictness Deterring Profit Shifting within Multinationals. Accounting and Business Research. 46(7), pp. 703-730.
5. Bhattacharjee, S. & Moreno, K. K. (2017). The Role of Information Controls and a Bargaining Opponent’s Emotions on Transfer Pricing Judgments. Contemporary Accounting Research. 34, pp. 427-454.
6. Ylönen, M. & Laine, M. (2015). For Logistical Reasons Only? A Case Study of Tax Planning and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. pp. 33, 5-23.
7. Hummel, K. Pfaff, D. & Bisig, B. (2017). Can Transfer Pricing System Integration Be Successful? Yes, it Can!. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2773512
8. Wang, J. (2016). The Chinese Approach to Transfer Pricing: Problems Faced and Paths to Improvement. British Tax Review. pp. 1, 89.

9. Muhammadi, Ahmed A.H. & Habib, A. (2016). Multinational transfer pricing of intangible assets: Indonesian tax auditors’ perspectives. Asian Review of Accounting. 24/3, pp. 313 – 337.
10. Sakurai, Y. (2002). Comparing Cross-Cultural Regulatory Styles and Processes in Dealing with Transfer Pricing. International Journal of the Sociology of Law. 30(3), pp. 173-199.
11. 1 Seri No’lu Transfer Fiyatlandırması Genel Tebliği (Draft Transfer Pricing General Communiqué No. 1), Resmi Gazete (Official Gazette), 26482, 03.04.2007
12. 3 Seri No’lu Transfer Fiyatlandırması Taslağı (Draft Transfer Pricing General Communiqué No. 3)
13. Corporate Income Taxation Act of Bulgaria, 2007
14. Tax and Social Insurance Procedure Code of Bulgaria, 2006
15. Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia 80/93, 33/95 –79/2013
16. OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations. (2010). OECD.
17. Ministry of Finance Albania - Instructions. https://www.tatime.gov.al/sqal/ Legjislacioni/COUNCIL_DECISIONS/Legjislacioni Accessed: October 3, 2016.
18. EY-Transfer Pricing Guide – Macedonia FYR. Retrieved: October 3, 2016. From http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-Worldwide-transfer-pricingreference-guide-2014/$FILE/Worldwide%20transfer%20pricing%20reference%20guide%202014.pdf
19. OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines, 2010. Retrieved: April 15, 2016. From OECD website: http://www.oecd.org/ctp/transfer-pricing/45765701.pdf
20. TP Catalyst. Accessed: April 15, 2016. From https://tpcatalyst.bvdep.com/ About Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS). (n.d.). Accessed April 15, 2016. from OECD website http://www.oecd.org/ctp/beps-about.htm
21. Action Plan 13. Retrieved: April 15, 2016. from OECD website: http://www.oecd.org/ctp/beps-action-13-guidance-implementation-tpdocumentation-cbc-reporting.pdf