Research Article

A Critical Overview of the Geometry of Fraud and a Model Proposal within the Framework of Situational Action Theory

Number: 93 January 17, 2022
TR EN

A Critical Overview of the Geometry of Fraud and a Model Proposal within the Framework of Situational Action Theory

Abstract

Geometric metaphors have been used in fraud theory for more than 60 years. The most commonly used of
these metaphors is the fraud triangle. The fraud triangle has been criticized severely for its scope,
substitutability of its elements, perceptuality, individuality and one-sidedness. Different models developed
afterwards tried to cover the shortcomings of the fraud triangle with additions and modifications, but none of
them became as popular as the fraud triangle. In this study, by moving away from the use of geometric
metaphors, which has become a traditional approach in explaining the structure and causality of fraud, a model
based on Situational Action Theory (SAT) is proposed. The aim of the study is to reveal that fraud has a complex
and multi-dimensional structure that cannot be explained with one-dimensional metaphors, and in this context,
to develop a theoretical model expressed in a mathematical formula for measuring fraud risk.

Keywords

References

  1. Albrecht, W. Steve - Howe, Keith R. - Romney, Marshall B. (1984), Deterring Fraud: The Internal Auditor’s Perspective, The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation, Altamonte Springs.
  2. Albrecht, W. Steve - Albrecht, Chad O. - Albrecht, Conan C. - Zimbelman, Mark F. (2012), Fraud Examination (4th Ed.), South-Western Cengage Learning, Ohio.
  3. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2002), AU section 316: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. https://www.aicpa.org/research/standards/auditattest/downloadabledocuments/au-00316.pdf
  4. Arnaud, Anke (2006), “A New Theory and Measure of Ethical Work Climate: The Psychological Process Model (PPM) and the Ethical Climate Index (ECI)”, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Central Florida. https://commons.erau.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=db-management
  5. Arnaud, Anke (2010), “Conceptualizing and Measuring Ethical Work Climate: Development and Validation of the Ethical Climate Index”, Business and Society, 49(2), pp. 345-358.
  6. Ashforth, Blake E. - Anand, Vikas (2003), “The Normalization of Corruption in Organizations”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, pp. 1-52.
  7. Bozkurt, Nejat (2009), İşletmelerin Kara Deliği Hile, Alfa Basım Yayın, İstanbul.
  8. Braithwaite, John (2013), “Flipping Markets to Virtue with Qui Tam and Restorative Justice”, Accounting, Organization and Society, 38(6–7), pp. 458-468.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Business Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 17, 2022

Submission Date

August 31, 2021

Acceptance Date

November 10, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Number: 93

APA
Yaşar, Ş. (2022). A Critical Overview of the Geometry of Fraud and a Model Proposal within the Framework of Situational Action Theory. Muhasebe Ve Finansman Dergisi, 93, 93-116. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.988992
AMA
1.Yaşar Ş. A Critical Overview of the Geometry of Fraud and a Model Proposal within the Framework of Situational Action Theory. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi. 2022;(93):93-116. doi:10.25095/mufad.988992
Chicago
Yaşar, Şebnem. 2022. “A Critical Overview of the Geometry of Fraud and a Model Proposal Within the Framework of Situational Action Theory”. Muhasebe Ve Finansman Dergisi, nos. 93: 93-116. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.988992.
EndNote
Yaşar Ş (January 1, 2022) A Critical Overview of the Geometry of Fraud and a Model Proposal within the Framework of Situational Action Theory. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi 93 93–116.
IEEE
[1]Ş. Yaşar, “A Critical Overview of the Geometry of Fraud and a Model Proposal within the Framework of Situational Action Theory”, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, no. 93, pp. 93–116, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.25095/mufad.988992.
ISNAD
Yaşar, Şebnem. “A Critical Overview of the Geometry of Fraud and a Model Proposal Within the Framework of Situational Action Theory”. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi. 93 (January 1, 2022): 93-116. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.988992.
JAMA
1.Yaşar Ş. A Critical Overview of the Geometry of Fraud and a Model Proposal within the Framework of Situational Action Theory. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi. 2022;:93–116.
MLA
Yaşar, Şebnem. “A Critical Overview of the Geometry of Fraud and a Model Proposal Within the Framework of Situational Action Theory”. Muhasebe Ve Finansman Dergisi, no. 93, Jan. 2022, pp. 93-116, doi:10.25095/mufad.988992.
Vancouver
1.Şebnem Yaşar. A Critical Overview of the Geometry of Fraud and a Model Proposal within the Framework of Situational Action Theory. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi. 2022 Jan. 1;(93):93-116. doi:10.25095/mufad.988992

Cited By