AHP METODUYLA ENTEGRE RAPORLAMA ENDEKSI OLUŞTURULMASINA YÖNELİK BİR MODEL ÖNERİSİ

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Analitik Hiyerarşik Süreci (Analytical Hierarchical Process-AHP) araştırma yöntemini kullanarak Entegre Raporlama Endeksi Modellemesi yoluyla bir “Entegre Ra-porlama Endeksi-Integrated Reporting Index (IRI)” oluşturmayı amaçlamaktadır. IRI top-lam 39 kriterden oluşmakta olup analiz bulguları sonucunda; ilgili stratejik hedefler, strate-jiler, politikalar, hedefler ve temel performans göstergelerinin belirlenmesi de dahil olmak üzere temel riskleri azaltmak veya yönetmek veya temel fırsatlardan değer yaratmak için alınan önlemlerle ilgili en önemli gösterge olduğu ve 39 göstergeden %12,3'ünü oluşturdu-ğu belirlenmiştir. Diğer göstergeler daha düşük bir oranda bunu takip etmiştir. Uygulayıcı-lar ve akademisyenler tarafından kurumsal raporlamanın entegre raporlamaya hızla evril-mesine yönelik artan vurguya rağmen, entegre raporlama için bir endeks oluşturulması konusunda daha önce hiçbir çalışma yapılmamıştır. Bu amaçla, bu çalışma hem akademik literatüre hem de yatırım ve iş uygulamalarına katkıda bulunarak bu boşluğu kapatmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Keywords

• Entegre Raporlama
• Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci
• Entegre Raporlama Endeksi
• Entegre Değer Yaratma
• Kurumsal Raporlama

CREATING AN INTEGRATED REPORTING INDEX USING THE AHP METHOD: MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aims to create an index that enables measuring the value creation capabilities of organizations/companies. In order to this, an “Integrated Reporting Index” (IRI) was created through Integrated Reporting Index Modeling. As a result of the analysis findings, IRI was determined to be the most important indicator concerning the measures taken to reduce or manage key risks or create value from key opportunities, including the determination of related strategic goals, strategies, policies, targets, and key performance indicators, making up 12.3% out of 39 (thirty-nine) indicators. Other indicators followed at a lower rate. Despite the increasing emphasis by practitioners and academics on the rapid evolution of corporate reporting into integrated reporting and sustainability reporting, no previous study has been conducted on the creation of an index for integrated reporting. To this end, this study aims to bridge this gap by contributing both to the academic literature and investment and business practices.

Keywords

• Integrated Reporting
• Analytical Hierarchical Process
• Integrated Reporting Index
• Integrated Value Creation
• Corporate Reporting

References

1. Abhayawansa, S., Elijido‐Ten, E., & Dumay, J. (2019). A practice theoretical analysis of the irrelevance of integrated reporting to mainstream sell‐side analysts. Accounting & Finance, 59(3), 1615-1647. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12367
2. ACCA. (2012). Integrated reporting: The influence of King III on social, ethical and environmental reporting. https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/10023/3749/ACCA-2012-Integrated-Reporting.pdf
3. Adams, C. A. (2004) The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance portrayal gap. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(5), 731-757. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570410567791
4. Adams, C. A. (2015). The international integrated reporting council: a call to action. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.07.001
5. Adams, C. A. (2017). The Sustainable Development Goals, integrated thinking and the integrated report. Integrated Reporting (IR), 1-52. https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2017-09/apo-nid303601.pdf
6. Adams, S., & Simnett, R. (2011). Integrated Reporting: An opportunity for Australia's not‐for‐profit sector. Australian Accounting Review, 21(3), 292-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2011.00143.x
7. Azam, Z., Warraich, K. M., & Awan, S. H. (2011). One report: bringing change in corporate reporting through integration of financial and non-financial performance disclosure. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 1(1), 50. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Zubair-Azam/publication/272664549_One_Report_Bringing_Change_in_Corporate_Reporting_through_integration_of_Financial_and_Non-Financial_Performance_Disclosure/links/564f1afc08aeafc2aab39852/One-Report-Bringing-Change-in-Corporate-Reporting-through-integration-of-Financial-and-Non-Financial-Performance-Disclosure.pdf
8. Beske, F., Haustein, E., & Lorson, P. C. (2020). Materiality analysis in sustainability and integrated reports. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 162-186. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2018-0343

9. Cerbone, D., & Maroun, W. (2020). Materiality in an integrated reporting setting: Insights using an institutional logics framework. The British Accounting Review, 52(3), 100876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.100876
10. Dumay, J., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J., & La Torre, M. (2017). Barriers to implementing the International Integrated Reporting Framework: A contemporary academic perspective. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(4), 461-480. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-05-2017-0150
11. Eccles, R. G., Krzus, M. P., & Ribot, S. (2015). Meaning and momentum in the integrated reporting movement. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 27(2), 8-17. https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/JACF%20Meaning%20and%20Momentum_bfcd6601-d843-4f96-8b07-537746314dbe.pdf
12. Feng, T., Cummings, L., & Tweedie, D. (2017). Exploring integrated thinking in integrated reporting–an exploratory study in Australia. Journal of Intellectual Capital. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-06-2016-0068
13. Göral, R. (2015). e-WOM’a dayali çok kriterli karar verme teknikleri ile en uygun otelin belirlenmesi ve bir uygulama. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (33), 1-17. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/susbed/issue/61813/924679
14. Güldoğan, Ö. (2022). Kurumsal Raporlamanın Tarihsel Süreç İçerisindeki Gelişimi: Kavramsal Bir İnceleme. The Journal Of Academic Social Sciences. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ASOS.57734
15. Güldoğan, Ö. (2020). Entegre Raporlamada Paydaşlar İle İlişkilerin Rolü. Muhasebe ve Finans İncelemeleri Dergisi, 3(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.32951/mufider.699353
16. Güngör, İ., & İşler, D. B. (2004). Analitik Hiyerarşi Yaklaşimi İle Otomobil Seçimi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 1(2), 21-33. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijmeb/issue/54839/750850
17. Horodnic, I. A., Williams, C. C., & CHIȚAC, I. (2022). Evaluating the relationship between sustainable development, localisation and the informal economy: evidence from Romania. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 13(2). https://ejes.uaic.ro/articles/EJES2022_1302_HOR.pdf
18. IIRC. (2013). International IR Framework https://www.integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/13-12-08-THE-INTERNATIONAL-IR-FRAMEWORK-2-1.pdf
19. IIRC. (2020). Consultation Draft of the International IR Framework https://www.integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/CONSULTATION-DRAFT_May-21_IIRC.pdf
20. Karaburun, G. & Demirci, Ş. D. (2020). Muhasebe kültürü ve entegre raporlama farkındalığı ilişkisi. Journal of Economy Culture and Society.
21. Lai, A., Melloni, G. and Stacchezzini, R. (2017). What does materiality mean to integrated reporting preparers? An empirical exploration, Meditari Accountancy Research, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 533-552. https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/64269/1/Accepted_manuscript.pdf
22. Lai, A., Melloni, G. and Stacchezzini, R. (2018). Integrated reporting and narrative accountability: the role of preparer, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 31 No. 5, pp.1381-1405. https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/66233/1/Accepted_manuscript.pdf
23. Lakshan, A.M.I., Low, M. and de Villiers, C. (2021), “Management of risks associated with the disclosure of future-oriented information in integrated report,” Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 241-266 https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/handle/2263/83040/Lakshan_Management_2021.pdf?sequence=1
24. Maroun, W., Ecim, D., & Cerbone, D. (2022). Refining integrated thinking. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2021-0268 https://www.oceantomo.com/intangible-asset-market-value-study/
25. Okwuosa, I., & Atkins, J. (2022). Exploring the meaningfulness of integrated reporting: a framing perspective. Journal of Applied Accounting Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-03-2022-0075
26. Paternostro, S. (2020). Integrated reporting and social disclosure: True love or forced marriage? A Multidimensional analysis of a contested concept. In Non-Financial Disclosure and Integrated Reporting: Practices and Critical Issues (Vol. 34, pp. 107-146). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-351220200000034008
27. Poveda, C. A., & Lipsett, M. G. (2013). Weighting sustainable development indicators (SDIs) for surface mining operations using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v5i2.199
28. Reporting, T. I. (2011). Towards Integrated Reporting-Communicating Value in the 21st Century (2011) on IIRC.[online][cit. 2012-24-3] http://theiirc. org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09. IR-Discussion-Paper-2011_ spreads. Pdf
29. Saaty, T. L., Vargas, L. G., Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2012). The seven pillars of the analytic hierarchy process. Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process, 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6_2
30. Saaty, T. L. (2016). The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision-making. Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys, 363-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_10
31. Saaty, T. L. (2008). The analytic hierarchy and analytic network measurement processes: applications to decisions under risk. European journal of pure and applied mathematics, 1(1), 122-196. https://doi.org/10.29020/nybg.ejpam.v1i1.6
32. Selimoglu, S. K., & Yesilcelebi, G. (2021). Integrated Reporting and Combined Assurance: A Qualitative Research on the Awareness in Turkey. In New Challenges for Future Sustainability and Wellbeing (pp. 463-482). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-968-920211025
33. Tofan, M., Onofrei, M., & Vatamanu, A. F. (2020). Fiscal Responsibility Legal Framework—New Paradigm for Fiscal Discipline in the EU. Risks, 8(3), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks8030079
34. Usul, H. (2007). Davranışsal Muhasebe. Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
35. Velte, P. (2025). Audit Quality and Materiality Disclosure Quality in Integrated Reporting: The Moderating Effect of Carbon Assurance Quality. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3153
36. Wee, M., Tarca, A., Krug, L., Aerts, W., Pink, P., & Tilling, M. (2016). Factors affecting preparers’ and auditors’ judgements about materiality and conciseness in integrated reporting. ACCA, London. https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/15093945/pi_materiality_conciseness_ir_FINAL.pdf
37. Zennaro, G., Corazza, G., & Zanin, F. (2024). The effects of integrated reporting quality: a meta-analytic review. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(7), 197-235. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-09-2023-2175