AIR POLLUTION AND INCOME RELATIONSHIP IN TURKISH PROVINCES: A SPATIAL APPROACH

Year 2016, , 127 - 146, 01.06.2016

Abdurrahman Nazif Çatık Mehmet Karaçuka Gul Huyugüzel Kışla

https://doi.org/10.14780/iibd.22840

Cited By: 2

Abstract

This paper investigates the existence of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) for Turkey by considering pollution spillovers among the provinces by using annual data covering the period 1990-2001. Spatial econometrics techniques are employed to account for pollution spillovers. Spatial interactions are measured by means of weight matrices based on contiguity and distance between the neighboring provinces. Our results show that exclusion of spatial heterogeneity among the regions may lead to specification bias in EKC estimations. The significance of pollution spillovers in the spatial estimates suggest that the relationship between pollution and per capita income is also affected by the localities of regions. Our results also imply that environmental quality cannot be sustained at the expense of neighboring regions. Therefore environmental policies should be accommodated by both regional and national policies to achieve sustainable development.

References

• AKBOSTANCI, E., Türüt-Aşık, S. and Tunç, İ.,“The Relationship between Income and Environment In Turkey: Is There an Environmental Kuznets Curve?”, Energy Policy, 37(3), 2009, pp.861–867.
• ANSELIN, L. and Florax, R. J.,Small Sample Properties of Tests for Spatial Dependence in Regression Models: Some Further Results, In New Directions in Spatial Econometrics, ed. Luc Anselin and Rey Florax, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1995, pp. 21–74.
• ANSELIN L. and Florax, R. J.,Advancesin Spatial Econometrics. Methodology, Tools and Applications. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 2004.
• ANSELIN, L.,Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Dordrect, The Netherlands, Kluwer, 1988.
• ANSELIN, L., Spatial Econometrics, In Palgrave Handbook of Econometrics, ed. Terence C. Mills and Kerry Patterson, Basingstoke, Palgrave McMillan, 2006.
• ASGHARI, M., “Environmental Kuznets Curve and Growth Source in Iran”, Panoeconomicus, 59(5), 2012, pp. 609–623.
• CARSON, R. T., Yongil, J. and McCubbin, D. R. “The Relationship between Air Pollution Emissions and Income: US data”, Environment and Development Economics, 2(4), 1997, pp. 433–450.
• DASGUPTA, S., Laplante, B., Wang, H. and Wheeler, D. “Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve.” , Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(1), 2002, pp. 147–168.
• DINDA, S., “Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey”, Ecological Economics, 49(4), 2004, pp. 431–455.
• ELHORST, P., “Specification and Estimation Panel Data Models”, International Regional Review, 26(3), 2003, pp. 244-268.
• ELGIN, C. and Öztunalı, O., “Environmental Kuznets Curve for the Informal Sector of Turkey (1950-2009)”, Panoeconomicus, 61(4), 2014, pp. 471-485.
• FLORAX, R. J. G. M., Folmer H., and Rey, S.J., “Specification Searches In Spatial Econometrics: The Relevance of Hendry’s Methodology”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33(23), 2003, pp. 557–579.
• GROSSMAN, G. M. and Krueger,A. B., “Environmental Impacts of the North American Free Trade Agreement”, NBER Working paper, 3914, 1991.
• KAYGUSUZ, K., “Energy Use and Air Pollution Issues in Turkey”, Clean, 35(6), 2007, pp. 539-547.
• KARAÇUKA, M. and Çatık. A. N., “A Spatial Approach to Measure Productivity Spillovers of Foreign Affiliated Firms In Turkish Manufacturing Industries.” The Journal of Developing Areas, 46 (2), 2012, pp. 65-83.
• KELLER, W.,“International Technology Diffusion”, Journal of Economic Literature, 42(3), 2004, pp. 752782.
• KUZNETS, S., “Economic Growth and Income Inequality”, American Economic Review, 45(1), 1955, pp.128.
• LEE, L., “Asymptotic Distributions of Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimators for Spatial Autoregressive Models”, Econometrica, 72(6), 2004, pp. 1899–1925.
• LISE, W., “Decomposition of CO2 Emissions over 1980-2003 in Turkey”, Energy Policy, 34 (14), 2006, pp.1841-1852.
• MADDISON, D., “Environmental Kuznets Curves: A Spatial Econometric Approach”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 51(2), 2006, pp.218–230.
• MADDISON, D., “Modeling sulphur emissions in Europe: A spatial econometric approach”, Oxford Economic Papers, 59(4), 2007, pp. 726–743.
• MEADOWS, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. and. Behrens, W. W., The Limits to Growth, New York, Universe Books, 1972.
• ÖZDİLEK, H. G., “An Analogy on Assessment of Urban Air Pollution in Turkey over the turn of the Millennium (1992-2001)”, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 122(1-3), 2006, pp. 203219.
• RUPASINGHA, A., Goetz, S. J., Debertin, D. L. and Pagoulatos, A., “The Environmental Kuznets Curve for US counties: A Spatial Econometric Analysis with Extensions”, Papers in Regional Science, 83, 2004, pp. 407-424.
• SOYTAS, U. and Sarı, R., “Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Carbon Emissions: Challenges Faced by an EU Candidate Member”, Ecological Economics, 68(6), 2007, pp. 1667-1675.
• STERN, D. I., “Progress on the Environmental Kuznets Curve?”, Environment and Development Economics, 3(2), 1998, pp.173-196.
• STERN, D. I., “The Rise And The Fall of Environmental Kuznets Curve”, World Development, 32(8), 2004, pp. 1419-1439.
• STERN, D. I., Common, M. S. and Barbier, E. B.,“Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation: A Critique of the Environmental Kuznets Curve.” World Development, 24(7), 1996, pp. 1151-1160.
• VINCENT, J. R., “Testing for Environmental Kuznets Curves within a Developing Country”, Environment and Development Economics, 2(4), 1997, pp. 417-431.
• TSURAMİ, T. and Managi, S., “Decomposition of the environmental Kuznets curve: scale, technique, and composition effects”, Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 11, 2010, pp. 19-36.
• ZHENG, X., Yu, Y., Wang, J. and Deng, H., “Identifying the Determinants and Spatial Nexus of Provincial Carbon Intensity in China: A Dynamic Spatial Panel Approach”, Regional Environmental Change 14, 2013, pp. 1651-1661.