Diş Hekimliği Öğrencileri ve Diş Hekimlerinin Şeffaf Plaklar Hakkındaki Bilgi Düzeylerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2025, Volume: 15 Issue: 3, 1040 - 1048, 30.09.2025

Saniye Merve Cengiz , Kübra Arslan Çarpar , Sevde Nihal Yongacı

https://doi.org/10.31020/mutftd.1678058

Abstract

Amaç: Gelişen teknolojiyle birlikte dijital tasarımların ve üretimlerin ortodontik tedavilerde kullanımı sonucu popülaritesi artan şeffaf plaklar, yüksek oranda tercih edilen bir tedavi seçeneği olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Bu anket çalışmasında diş hekimliği fakültesinde ortodonti pratik ve teorik eğitimini alan 4. ve 5. sınıf öğrencileri ile son 2 sene içerisinde mezun olmuş diş hekimlerinin şeffaf plak tedavileri hakkındaki bilgi düzeylerinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmaktadır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya diş hekimliği 4. ve 5. sınıf öğrencileri ile son 2 sene içerisinde mezun olmuş diş hekimleri dahil edildi. Katılımcılara şeffaf plaklar ile ilgili 25 sorudan oluşan bir anket uygulandı.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya toplamda 219 birey katıldı. Katılımcıların 96’sı 4. sınıf öğrencisi, 75’i 5. sınıf öğrencisi ve 48’i 2023-2024 yıllarında mezun olmuş diş hekimlerinden oluşmaktadır. Yapılan istatistiksel analizler sonucunda pekiştirme apareyi ve tedaviyi uygulaması gereken hekim grubuna dair verilen yanıtlarda farklı yaş gruplarına göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Plakların takılıp çıkarılabilmesi, plaklarla uyunabilmesi, plakta beslenmeyle oluşan renklenme ve plaklarla ağız bakımına dair verilen yanıtlarda cinsiyet gruplarına göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Şeffaf plakların nereden/kimden duyulduğu, plaklarla uyunabilmesi, ataşmanların amacı ve uygulanması ile protetik yaklaşımlara dair verilen yanıtlarda farklı eğitim düzeylerine göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar bulunmuştur (p<0,05).
Sonuç: Gelişen teknolojiyle birlikte popülaritesi artan şeffaf plak tedavilerine dair bilgi düzeylerinde anlamlı farklılıklar olduğu görülmüştür. Şeffaf plak tedavilerinin etkinliğinin arttırılmasında, materyalin tanınması ve tüm özelliklerinin anlaşılabilmesi için bilgi düzeyinin arttırılması gerekmektedir.

Keywords

Şeffaf plak , Diş hekimi , Öğrenci , Bilgi düzeyi

Ethical Statement

Mersin Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Klinik Araştırmalar Etik Kurul Başkanlığı (Tarih: 04/09/2024, Sayı: 809)

Evaluation of Knowledge Levels about Clear Aligners among Dental Students and Dentists

Abstract

Introduction: With advancements in technology, the use of digital designs and manufacturing in orthodontic treatments has significantly increased the popularity of clear aligners, making them a widely preferred treatment option. This cross-sectional survey aimed to evaluate the knowledge levels concerning clear aligner therapy among 4th- and 5th-year dental students undergoing theoretical and clinical orthodontic training, as well as dentists who graduated within the past 2 years.
Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 4th- and 5th-year dental students and dentists who had graduated within the last 2 years. Participants were asked to complete a 25-item multiple-choice questionnaire focused on clear aligner therapy.
Results: A total of 219 individuals participated, including 96 4th-year students, 75 5th-year students, and 48 dentists who graduated between 2023 and 2024. Statistical analyses revealed significant differences across age groups in responses related to the necessity of retention appliances and the appropriate type of practitioner to deliver aligner therapy (p<0.05). Gender-based differences were also observed in views related to the removability of aligners, comfort during sleep, staining due to food intake, and oral hygiene habits during aligner use (p<0.05). Furthermore, educational level was significantly associated with participants’ knowledge of aligner information sources, comfort-related experiences, understanding of attachment functions and placement, as well as prosthodontic treatment compatibility (p<0.05).
Conclusion: The findings demonstrate notable disparities in knowledge levels about clear aligner therapy, a treatment approach whose popularity continues to grow with technological progress. Enhancing the understanding of clear aligner materials and their properties is essential for improving the effectiveness and outcomes of such treatments.

Keywords

Clear aligner , Dentist , Student , Knowledge level

References

• 1. Zhou C, et al. Expert consensus on pediatric orthodontic therapies of malocclusions in children. Int J Oral Sci 2024;16(1):32.
• 2. Klages U, et al. Development of a questionnaire for assessment of the psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics in young adults. Eur J Orthod 2006;28(2):103-111.
• 3. Weir T. Clear aligners in orthodontic treatment. Aust Dent J 2017;62:58-62.
• 4. Alajmi S, Shaban A, Al-Azemi R. Comparison of short-term oral impacts experienced by patients treated with Invisalign or conventional fixed orthodontic appliances. Med Princ Pract 2020;29(4):382-388.
• 5. Kesling HD. The philosophy of the tooth positioning appliance. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 1945;31(6):297-304.
• 6. Vlaskalic V, Boyd RL. Clinical evolution of the Invisalign appliance. J Calif Dent Assoc 2002;30(10):769-775.
• 7. Galan-Lopez L, Barcia-Gonzalez J, Plasencia E. A systematic review of the accuracy and efficiency of dental movements with Invisalign®. Korean J Orthod 2019;49(3):140-149.
• 8. Narongdej P, et al. Advancements in clear aligner fabrication: a comprehensive review of direct-3D printing technologies. Polymers (Basel) 2024;16(3):371.
• 9. Kolge NE, et al. Evaluation of Knowledge, Awareness and Attitude Regarding Clear Aligner Therapy Amongst BDS Interns: A Cross-sectional Questionnaire-based Survey. Jour Clin Med Res 2023;4(2):1-12.
• 10. Buschang PH, et al. Comparative time efficiency of aligner therapy and conventional edgewise braces. Angle Orthod 2014;84(3):391-396.
• 11. Agrawal R. Knowledge, attitude and perception of orthodontic treatment among dental students. Int J Dent Res 2018;6(1):3-5.
• 12. Lee SY. A study on orthodontic treatment knowledge and attitude among people in general. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2012;12(2):251-260.
• 13. Selvaraj V, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practices of clear aligners among general dentist and non-orthodontic postgraduates–A cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Rom J Stomatol 2023;69(4):256.
• 14. Shaw S. Knowledge of Dental Students with Respect to Orthodontic Diagnosis and Clear Aligner Therapy. University of Missouri-Kansas City; 2016.
• 15. Abdelemam AA, Abdelrahman HH, Hassan MG. # clearaligners and social media: An in‐depth analysis of clear aligners’ content on Instagram. Orthod Craniofac Res 2024;27(2):259-266.
• 16. Boyd RL. Esthetic orthodontic treatment using the invisalign appliance for moderate to complex malocclusions. J Dent Educ 2008;72(8):948-967.
• 17. Chisari JR, et al. Variables affecting orthodontic tooth movement with clear aligners. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2014;145(4):S82-S91.
• 18. Misawa‐Kageyama Y, et al. Histomorphometric study on the effects of age on orthodontic tooth movement and alveolar bone turnover in rats. Eur J Oral Sci 2007;115(2):124-130.
• 19. Uludağ İ, Çağla ŞAR. Ortodonti-Periodontoloji ilişkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekim Fakültesi Derg 2014;24(2):291-300.
• 20. Cardoso PC, et al. Pain level between clear aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review. Prog Orthod 2020;21:1-17.
• 21. Banerjee S, et al. Effect of orthodontic pain on quality of life of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Indian J Dent Res 2018;29(1):4-9.
• 22. Ganta GK, et al. Clear aligners, the aesthetic solution: a review. Int J Dent Mater 2021;3(3):90-95.
• 23. Levrini L, et al. Assessment of Food Masticatory Capability with Clear Aligners. Dent J 2024;12(7):217.
• 24. Liu CL, et al. Colour stabilities of three types of orthodontic clear aligners exposed to staining agents. Int J Oral Sci 2016;8(4):246-253.
• 25. Phan X, Ling PH. Clinical limitations of Invisalign. J Can Dent Assoc (Tor) 2007;73(3).
• 26. Nucera R, et al. Effects of composite attachments on orthodontic clear aligners therapy: a systematic review. Materials (Basel) 2022;15(2):533.
• 27. Alsaud BA, et al. Bonding of clear aligner composite attachments to ceramic materials: An in vitro study. Materials (Basel) 2022;15(12):4145.
• 28. Charavet C, et al. Cleaning and disinfection protocols for clear orthodontic aligners: A systematic review. In: Healthcare Vol 10. MDPI; 2022:340.
• 29. Meade MJ, Dreyer CW. A survey of retention and retainer practices of orthodontists in Australia. Australas Orthod J 2019;35(2):174-183.