ICON Hakkında Bilgi Kaynağı Olarak YouTubeTM Videolarının Değerlendirilmesi: Kesitsel Bir Çalışma

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, YouTube™ platformundaki ICON ve reçine infiltrasyon tekniğiyle ilgili videoların bilgilendirici içeriğini değerlendirmektir. Yöntem: YouTube™’da ‘resin infiltration technique’ ve ‘ICON’ anahtar kelimeleri kullanılarak arama yapıldı. YouTube™ sonuçları “ilgililiğe göre” filtrelendi ve her iki anahtar kelime için ilk 100 video değerlendirildi. Dahil etme/dışlama kriterlerine göre 103 video analiz edildi. Videoların parametreleri (izlenme sayısı, beğeni sayısı, beğenmeme sayısı, yorum sayısı, yüklenme süresi, video süresi, etkileşim indeksi (II) ve video güç indeksi (VPI)) kaydedildi. Güvenilirlik, doğruluk ve içerik kalitesi; modifiye DISCERN Anketi, Amerikan Tıp Derneği (JAMA) kriterleri ve Küresel Kalite Ölçeği (GQS) kullanılarak değerlendirildi. İstatistiksel analizde Kruskal Wallis testi, Dunnett’in Post Hoc testi ve Spearman korelasyon katsayıları kullanıldı. Anlamlılık düzeyi 0.05 olarak belirlendi. Bulgular: YouTube™’da ICON ile ilgili videolar analiz edildiğinde, video yükleyicisinin kaynağına göre yapılan değerlendirmede yalnızca JAMA kriterlerinde anlamlı bir fark bulundu (p<0.01). JAMA-GQS, JAMA-m-DISCERN ve GQS-m-DISCERN arasında pozitif korelasyon tespit edildi (sırasıyla r= 0.215, r= 0.32, r= 0.481). Sonuç: YouTube™ videoları, beyaz nokta lezyonları veya florozis olan hastalara minimal invaziv bir tedavi seçeneği hakkında bilgi vermede faydalı olabilir. Ancak, kesin tanı ve tedavi için uzmanlara danışmak hayati önem taşımaktadır.

Keywords

• GQS
• ICON
• JAMA
• modifiye DISCERN
• rezin infiltrasyon tekniği
• YouTube™

Evaluation of YouTubeTM Videos Regarding ICON as an Information Resource: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the informational content of YouTube™ videos related to ICON and the resin infiltration technique. Method: ‘Resin infiltration technique’ and ‘ICON’ was searched as a keyword on YouTube™. YouTube™ was filtered by the relevance, and the first 100 videos for each two keywords were evaluated. After the inclusion/exclusion criteria 103 the video was analyzed. Parameters of the videos (the number of views, likes, dislikes, comments, the days since the upload, the duration of the video, interaction index (II), and video power index (VPI)) were recorded. Reliability, accuracy, and content quality were evaluated by the modified-DISCERN Questionnaire, the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark, Global Quality Scale (GQS). The Kruskal Wallis test, the Dunnett’s Post Hoc and Spearman correlation coefficients were used for statistical analysis. The significance levels were set at 0.05. Results: When the YouTube™ videos related to ICON were analyzed, according to video uploader sources assessment there was a significance different only in the JAMA criteria (p<0.01). A positive correlation was detected among JAMA-GQS, JAMA-m-DISCERN, and GQS-m-DISCERN scores (r= 0.215, r= 0.32, r= 0.481, respectively). Conclusion: YouTube™ videos are useful for informing patients with white spot lesions or fluorosis that a minimal invasive treatment option is available. However, it is essential to consult professionals for definitive diagnosis and treatment.

Keywords

• GQS
• ICON
• JAMA
• modified-DISCERN
• resin infiltration technique
• YouTubeTM

References

1. 1. Fejerskov O, Manji F, Baelum V. The nature and mechanisms of dental fluorosis in man. J Dent Res. 1990;69(Suppl 2):692-700.
2. 2. Dean HT, Arnold FA, Elvove E. Domestic water and dental caries. Public Health Rep. 1942;57(32):1555-94.
3. 3. Bhagavatula P, et al. Timing of fluoride intake and dental fluorosis on late‐erupting permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2016;44(1):32-45.
4. 4. Edelstein BL. The dental caries pandemic and disparities problem. BMC Oral Health. 2006;15(6/Suppl 1): 2.
5. 5. Featherstone J. Remineralization, the natural caries repair process—the need for new approaches. Adv Dental Res. 2009;21(1):4-7.
6. 6.Paris S, et al. Masking of white spot lesions by resin infiltration in vitro. J Dent. 2013; 41:28-34.
7. 7. Ko C, et al. Optical scattering power for characterization of mineral loss. J Dent Res. 2000;79(8):1584-1589.
8. 8. Torres CRG, et al. Effect of caries infiltration technique and fluoride therapy on the colour masking of white spot lesions. J Dent. 2011;39(3):202-207.

9. 9. Garg S, Chavda S. Color masking white fluorotic spots by resin infiltration and its quantitation by computerized photographic analysis: A 12-month follow-up study. Oper Dent. 2020;45(1):1-9.
10. 10. Sherwood IA. Fluorosis varied treatment options. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13(1):47.
11. 11. Di Giovanni T, Eliades T, Papageorgiou SN. Interventions for dental fluorosis: A systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(6):502-508.
12. 12. Altan H, Yilmaz RE. Clinical evaluation of resin infiltration treatment masking effect on hypomineralised enamel surfaces. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):444.
13. 13. Ibrahim DFA, et al. Resin infiltration ICON®: A Guide for Clinical Use. Maleys J Paediatr Dent. 2023;2(1):27-35.
14. 14. Maziriri ET, Gapa P, Chuchu T. Student perceptions towards the use of YouTube as an educational tool for learning and tutorials. Int J Instr. 2020;13(2):119-138.
15. 15. Lupșa-Tătaru DA, Lixăndroiu R. YouTube channels, subscribers, uploads and views: a multidimensional analysis of the first 1700 channels from july 2022. Sustainability. 2022;14(20):13112.
16. 16. Pandita R. Information pollution, a mounting threat: Internet a major causality. 2014.
17. 17. Tozar KN, Yapıcı Yavuz G. Reliability of information on YouTube™ regarding pediatric dental trauma. Dent Traumatol. 2021;37(6):772-778.
18. 18. Kodonas K, Fardi A. YouTube as a source of information about pulpotomy and pulp capping: a cross sectional reliability analysis. Restor Dent Endod. 2021;46(3).
19. 19. Dias da Silva MA, Pereira AC, Walmsley AD. Who is providing dental education content via YouTube? Br Dent J. 2019;226(6):437-440.
20. 20. Uzel İ, et al. YouTube as an information source in paediatric dentistry education: Reliability and quality analysis. Plos One. 2023;18(3):0283300.
21. 21. Loureiro JM, et al. YouTube™ as a source of tooth avulsion information: A video analysis study. Dent Traumatol. 2023;39(6):616-624.
22. 22. Li Z, et al. Assessing quality and reliability of online videos on tachycardia: a YouTube video-based study. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):2620.
23. 23. Bernard A, et al. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(9):2070-2077.
24. 24. Karagoz B, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy and quality of information in videos about lateral epicondylitis shared on internet video sharing services. Cureus. 2022;14(2).
25. 25. Incerti-Parenti S, et al. Online Audio-Visual Information on the Treatment of OSA with Mandibular Advancement Devices: Analysis of Quality, Reliability and Contents. Appl Sci. 2023;13(9):5727.
26. 26. Garber DA, Salama MA. The aesthetic smile: diagnosis and treatment. Periodontol 2000. 199611(1):18-28.
27. 27. Patel A, Aghababaie S, Parekh S. Hypomineralisation or hypoplasia? Br Dent J. 2019;227(8):683-686.
28. 28. Lygidakis N, et al. Best clinical practice guidance for clinicians dealing with children presenting with molar-incisor-hypomineralisation (MIH) an EAPD policy document. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010; 11:75-81.
29. 29. Atkinson N, Saperstein S, Pleis J. Using the internet for health-related activities: findings from a national probability sample. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(1):1035.
30. 30. Lena Y, Dindaroğlu F. Lingual orthodontic treatment: A YouTube™ video analysis. Angle Orthod. 2018;88(2):208-214.
31. 31 Lee K-N, et al. YouTube as a source of information and education on hysterectomy. J Korean Med Sci. 2020;35(25).
32. 32. Gonzalez-Estrada A, et al. Popular on YouTube: a critical appraisal of the educational quality of information regarding asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015.
33. 33. Yavuz MC, Buyuk SK, Genc E. Does YouTube™ offer high quality information? Evaluation of accelerated orthodontics videos. Ir J Med Sci. 2020;189(2):505-509.
34. 34. Ramadhani A, et al. Quality and reliability of halitosis videos on YouTube as a source of information. Dent J. 2021;9(10):120.
35. 35. Kwak D, et al. Quality and reliability evaluation of online videos on carpal tunnel syndrome: a YouTube video-based study. BMJ open, 2022;12(4): e059239.