Ne Kadar Başarılı Yaşlanıyoruz?

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışma Türkiye'nin güneydoğusundaki yaşlıların ne kadar başarılı yaşlandıklarını belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır.
Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı çalışmanın örneklemi; Temmuz-Ekim 2019 tarihleri arasında iki Aile Sağlığı Merkezi’ne (ASM) başvuran 60 yaş ve üzeri 442 yaşlı bireyden oluşmaktadır. Veri toplamak için Kişisel Bilgi Formu ve Başarılı Yaşlanma Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde yüzde, frekans, ortalama, standart sapma, lineer regresyon, t testi ve Anova yapılmıştır.
Bulgular: SAS ortalamalarının yaşla birlikte azaldığı, eğitimle arttığı ve aralarındaki farkın anlamlı olduğu belirlenmiştir (p=0.00). SAS toplam ölçek puan ortalamasının 46.5±12.0 olduğu, bağımsız değişkenlerin başarılı yaşlanma üzerindeki etkisi R2=.262 olarak belirlenmiştir.
Sonuç: Çalışmaya alınan yaşlı bireylerin başarılı yaşlanma puanlarının toplam puan ortalamasının orta olduğu, yaş arttıkça başarılı yaşlanma puan ortalamasının azaldığı belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

• Yaşlı Birey
• Yaşlılık Dönemi
• Başarılı Yaşlanma

How Successful Are We Aging?

Abstract

Aim: This study was conducted to determine who live in southeastern Turkey, the older people how successful they get older.
Methods: The sample of the descriptive study; it consisted of 442 elderly individuals aged 60 and over who applied to two Family Health Centers (FHC) between July and October 2019. Personal Information Form and Successful Aging Scale were used to collect data. Percentage, frequency, average, standard deviation, linear regresyon, t test and Anova were performed in the data analysis (p<0.05).
Results: It was determined that the mean scores of Successful Aging Scale decreased with increasing age, increased with education and the difference between them was significant (p=0.00). It was determined that Successful Aging Scale total scale mean score was 46.5±12.0. The effect of independent variables on successful aging was determined as R2 = .262.
Conclusion: It was determined that total mean score of successful aging of the elderly individuals included in the study was medium, and as the age increased, the mean score of successful aging decreased.

Keywords

• Old Individual
• Old Age Period
• Successful Aging

Thanks

Thank you to all individuals who participated in the research.

References

1. 1. Flatt T, Partridge L. Horizons in the evolution of aging. BMC Biology 2018; 16: 93-106. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-018-0562-z
2. 2. Yin Z, et al. Status and determinants of health behavior knowledge among the elderly in China: a community-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2013; 13: 720. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-710
3. 3. Vural R, Yazıcı S, Özen M. Perception of successful aging: perspectives on old age of ındividuals from different age groups admitted to a district polyclinic in Antalya. Sted 2018; 27(5): 317-326.
4. 4. Bozhüyük A, et al. Healthy life style and family medicine. Turkish Journal of Family Practice 2012; 6(1):13-21.
5. 5. Motaghi M, Dolatabadi ED. Lifestyle of elderly people of Isfahan’s villages in Iran in 2014. IJHCS 2016; 790-803.
6. 6. Zanjani S, et al. Determinants of healthy lifestyle and its related factors among elderly people. J Educ Health Promot 2015; 4(1): 103-109. DOI: 10.4103 / 2277-9531.171817
7. 7. Yılmaz F, Çağlayan Ç. The effects of healthy lifestyle on the quality of life among elderly. Turkish Journal of Family Practice 2016; 20(4): 129-140. DOI: 10.15511/tahd.16.04129
8. 8. Bowling A, Iliffe S. Which model of successful ageing should be used? Baseline findings from a British longitudinal survey of ageing. Age and Ageing 2006; 35: 607-614. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afl100

9. 9. Katz S, Calasanti T. Critical perspectives on successful aging: Does it "appeal more than it illuminates"? The Gerontologist 2015; 55(1): 26-33. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnu027
10. 10. Chodzko-Zajko W, Schwingel A, Park CH. Successful aging: the role of physical activity. Am. J. Lifestyle Med 2009; 3: 20-8. DOI:10.1177 / 155982760832545
11. 11. Özmete E. While aging: Successful aging. We Are A Family Magazine Publication of Ministry of Family and Social Policies 2012; 1(1): 1-5.
12. 12. Martin P, et al. Defining successful aging: A tangible or elusive concept? The Gerontologist 2015; 55(1): 14-25. DOI:10.1093/geront/gnu044
13. 13. Gilleard C. Renaissance treatises on ‘’successful aging’’. Ageing & Society 2013; 33: 189-215. DOI:10.1017/S0144686X11001127
14. 14. Martin P, et al. Special issue: successful aging. The Gerontologist 2015, 55(1): 14-25. DOI:10.1093/geront/gnu044
15. 15. Liu H, et al. Evaluation of successful aging among older people in China: Results from China health and retirement longitudinal study. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17: 1183-1190. DOI: 10.1111 / ggi.12848
16. 16. Tkatch R, et al. A qualitative study to examine older adults’ perceptions of health: Keys to aging successfully. Geriatric Nursing 2017; 38(6): 485-490.
17. 17. Hazer O, Özsungur F. Turkish version of successful aging scale. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches 2017; 4; 184-206.
18. 18. Hill RD. A positive aging framework for guding geropsychology interventions. Behavior Therapy 2011; 4: 66-77. DOI: 10.1016 / j.beth.2010.04.006
19. 19. Öztürk ME, Kayıhan D. Healthy aging. Science Harmony 2018; 1(1): 51-3.
20. 20. Reker GT. A brief manual of the Successful Aging Scale (SAS). Canada: Researchgate 2009:1-13. DOI:10.13140/2.1.4238.720
21. 21. Galiana L, et al. Socio-demographic variables and successful aging of the Angolan elderly. Scientifica 2016: 1-10. DOI:10.1155/2016/5306756
22. 22. Özdemirkan T, Şenlik ZB, Şimşek AÇ. Sağlıklı aktif başarılı yaşlanma. Türkiye Sağlık Okuryazarlığı Dergisi. 2020; 1(1): 61-67.
23. 23. Yılmaz CK. Yaşlı bireylerde yerinde yaşlanma ile başarılı yaşlanma ve yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi. Sağlık ve Toplum. 2020; 20 (3):38-48.
24. 24. Wong RCP, et al. Public transport policy measures for improving elderly mobility. Transport Policy, 2018; 63: 73-79.
25. 25. Meng X, D'Arcy C. Successful aging in Canada: Prevalence and predictors from a population-based sample of older adults. Gerontology. 2014; 60(1): 65-72. DOI: 10.1159/000354538.
26. 26. Martinson M, Berridge C. Successful aging and İts discontents: A systematic review of the social gerontology literature. Gerontologist 2015; 55(1): 58-69. DOI: 10.1093/geront/ gnu037
27. 27. Tesch-Römer C, Hans-Werner W. Toward a more comprehensive concept of successful aging: Disability and care needs. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B 2017; 72(2): 310-318. DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbw162
28. 28. Kurt G, Beyaztaş FY, Erkol Z. The problems of aged people and the life satisfaction. Turkish Journal of Forensic Medicine 2010; 24(2): 32-9.
29. 29. Thornton WL, Paterson TS, Yeung SE. Age differences in everyday problem solving: The role of problem context. Int J Behav Dev 2013; 37: 13-20.
30. 30. Soylu CF, Pala C. Age related differences in problem solving performance. Current Approaches in Psychiatry 2018; 10(3): 290-301 DOI:10.18863/pgy.364106
31. 31. Chen X, Hertzog C, Park DC. Cognitive predictors of everyday problem solving across the lifespan. Gerontology 2017; 63:372-384.
32. 32. Gutierrez M, Tomas JM, Calayud P. Contributions of psychosocial factors and physical activity to successful aging. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 2018; 21(26): 1-9. DOI:10.1017/sjp.2018.27
33. 33. Prakash RS, et al. Physical activity and cognitive vitality. Annual Review of Psychology. 2015; 66: 769-797. DOI: 10.1146/ annurev-psych-010814-015249
34. 34. Bosnes I, et al. Prevalence and correlates of successful aging in a population-based sample of older adults: The hunt study. International Psychogeriatrics 2017; 29(3): 431-440. DOI: 10.1017//S1041610216001861