Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

3. SEVİYE'NİN TEHDİT EDEN DOĞASI FUAR HİERARŞİSİ ALTINDAKİ GİRİŞLER DEĞER MUHASEBESİ

Year 2013, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 55 - 64, 01.07.2013

Abstract

Gerek muhasebe disiplinine ait akademik çevreler, gerekse de muhasebe
meslek kuruluşları, uzun süredir tarihi maliyet esaslı muhasebeden gerçeğe
uygundeğer muhasebesine geçişin artıları ve eksileri üzerinde tartışmaktadırlar.
Bu geçiş süreci içerisinde, her iki tarafın da farklı alanlarda
güçlü savları olduğu söylenebilir. Uluslararası Muhasebe Standartları Kurulu
tarafından ortaya konulan hiyerarşi ise, eleştirilerin en büyük hedefi
haline gelmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, özellikle 3. seviye girdileri üzerinde
yoğunlaşarak ortaya konmuş olan hiyerarşi seviyelerine eleştirel bir bakış
açısı getirmektir.

References

  • Yahanpath, N. ve Joseph, T. 2011. A Brief Review of the Role of Shareholder Wealth Maximisation and Other Factors Contributing to the Global Financial Crisis, Qualitative Research in Financial Markets Vol. 3 No. 1, 2011, pp. 64-77, Emerald Group Publishing Limited 1755-4179 DOI 10.1108/17554171111124621
  • Zacharski, A. H., Rosenblat and A.,Teufel, A. 2007. FASB Statement on Fair Value Measurements, Journal of Investment Compliance, Vol 8, No. 1., pp. 36-39, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, ISSN 1528-5812
  • Zyla, M. L. 2009. Fair Value Measurements: Practical Guidance and Implementation, WileyCorporate F&A, second edition, 188.

THREATHINING NATURE OF LEVEL 3 INPUTS UNDER THE HIERARCHY OF FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING

Year 2013, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 55 - 64, 01.07.2013

Abstract

Accounting academia along withpractitioners has been long debating on
the pros and cons of the transition from Historical Cost Accounting into
Fair Value Accounting. Within this transition period, both sides have solid
arguments in various areas. As far as the hierarchy set by the International
Accounting Standards Board (IASB) is concerned, this arearaises the
main cluster of questions which deserves the most attention. The aim
of this paper is to criticizethe threatening nature of the levels of the hierarchy;
especially the level 3 inputs, by pointing out specific deficiencies.

References

  • Yahanpath, N. ve Joseph, T. 2011. A Brief Review of the Role of Shareholder Wealth Maximisation and Other Factors Contributing to the Global Financial Crisis, Qualitative Research in Financial Markets Vol. 3 No. 1, 2011, pp. 64-77, Emerald Group Publishing Limited 1755-4179 DOI 10.1108/17554171111124621
  • Zacharski, A. H., Rosenblat and A.,Teufel, A. 2007. FASB Statement on Fair Value Measurements, Journal of Investment Compliance, Vol 8, No. 1., pp. 36-39, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, ISSN 1528-5812
  • Zyla, M. L. 2009. Fair Value Measurements: Practical Guidance and Implementation, WileyCorporate F&A, second edition, 188.
There are 3 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section Issue
Authors

Can Kaya This is me

Publication Date July 1, 2013
Submission Date January 1, 2013
Acceptance Date May 1, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 6 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Kaya, C. (2013). THREATHINING NATURE OF LEVEL 3 INPUTS UNDER THE HIERARCHY OF FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING. Journal of Accounting and Taxation Studies, 6(2), 55-64.

Creative Commons Lisansı
This Journal Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.