Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

MANDAMUS EMİRNAMESİ VE KIBRIS TÜRK HUKUKUNDAKİ YERİ

Year 2022, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 788 - 812, 30.12.2022

Emete Gözügüzelli

Abstract

Yargı denetimi, kamu hukukumuzun temel taşıdır. Yargı denetimi yoluyla Yüksek Mahkeme, kamu yönetimine önemli bir katkı sağlamaktadır. Hakları, yükümlülükleri veya çıkarları kanunla korunan veya tanınan herhangi bir mahkeme veya başka bir kamu otoritesinin kararından etkilenen her kişi, kanuna uygun olarak, bu kararın yargısal denetimi için başvurma hakkına sahiptir. Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti’nde anayasal zeminde öngörülen Emirnameler İlkesi İngiliz döneminden beri Kıbrıs’ta uygulanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada 1985 Anayasasında 151. Madde 3. Fıkra kapsamında öngörülen mandamus emirnamesi konusunda değerlendirme yapılmıştır.

Keywords

Mandamus İngiliz Hukuku Kıbrıs Hukuku Hakkaniyet

References

  • Audrey, Davis, A Return To The Tradıtıonal Use Of The Wrıt Of Mandamus, Lewis & Clark Law review, Vol24.4, 2020,ss.1527-1548
  • Bamzaı,Adıtya, The Origins of Judicial Deference to Executive Interpretation, The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 126, No. 4 (Şubat 2017), ss. 908-1001
  • Control by Mandamus over Jurisdictional Mistake of Law, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 1, No. 4 (Ocak 1914), ss. 320-322
  • Dragan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration),21 Şubat 2003, (2003), 228 F.T.R. 52 (TD): Akt: Bellissimo, Mario
  • D., “Mandamus: A Compelling Remedy?”ss.1-17: https://www.cba.org/cba/cle/pdf/Bellissimo.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 15.01.2022)
  • E. R. S., Habeas Corpus as a Method of Review: Prohibition: Mandamus, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 41, No. 5 (Nisan 1943), ss. 937-943
  • Erhurman, Tufan, Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti İdari Yargılama Hukuku, Türk ve İngiliz Hukuk Sistemleriyle Karşılaştırmalı Bir İnceleme, Işık Kitapevi, Kıbrıs 2012,s.223.
  • Fenn Augustus H., Two Questions concerning Mandamus, The Yale Law Journal , Haziran 1893, Vol. 2, No. 6 (Ocak 1893), ss. 219-227,s.221
  • Gay - Torrence (1904) October 18, 1904, 144, 145,147: https://casetext.com/case/gay-v-torrance-2
  • Goodman, Leonard S., “Mandamus in the Colonies-The Rise of the Superintending Power of American Courts”, The
  • merican Journal of Legal History , Oct., 1957, Vol. 1, No. 4 (Oct., 1957), ss. 308-335,309-310.
  • Henderson, G., Foundations of English administrative law : certiorari and mandamus in the seventeenth century, Harvard University Press; London: Oxford University Press. 1963.s.127-42
  • In The Unıted States Court Of Appeals For The Nınth Cırcuıt, Case: 17-72917, 10/24/2017, ID: 10628844, DktEntry: 13, Page 1 of 234,s.10.
  • James E. Pfander, Marbury, Original Jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court’s Supervisory Powers, 101 COLUM. L. REV. 1515, 1525 (2001)
  • Mandamus In Admınıstratıve Actıons: Current Approaches, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1973:15,ss.207-217,s.208
  • Mandamus, The Yale Law Journal , Apr., 1910, Vol. 19, No. 6 (Nisan 1910), ss. 462-465
  • Mandamus. Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the United States. Mandamus in Aid of Appellate Jurisdiction, Columbia Law Review, Şubat 1933, Vol. 33, No. 2 (Şubat 1933), ss. 366-368
  • Mandamus. Determination of Constitutionality Source: Columbia Law Review, Vol. 24, No. 3 (Mart 1924), ss. 317-318
  • Mandamus. Public School Authorities. Administrative Law, Columbia Law Review, Aralık 1921, Vol. 21, No. 8 (Dec., 1921), ss. 823-824
  • Mandamus. Revocation of Void License Granted by Mayor , Columbia Law Review, Vol. 28, No. 7 (Kasım 1928), ss. 979-980
  • Mandamus. Writ to Compel Recognition as Officer of Private Corporation. Mandamus , The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 32, No. 5 (Mar., 1923), ss. 503-504
  • Mandamus: When Issued, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 21, No. 7 (Mayıs, 1923), ss. 813-814
  • Necatigil, Zaim,Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti’nde Anayasa ve Yönetim Hukuku,Rüstem Kitapevi,İstanbul,1988,s.129
  • Revıew Of Prerogatıve Wrıts, Issues Paper/Law Commission, New Zeland.,Wellington 2008,ss.1-44,s.7
  • State v. Hurd Case (1895),USA Law, 47: https://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/supreme-court/1981/86-n-j-525-0.html
  • Tapping, Thomas, “The Law And Practıce Of The High Prerogative Writ Of Mandamus 2” (1853). s 56
  • Turhan, Turgut, Tarihsel Bakış Açısıyla Kıbrıs Türk Hukuk Sistemi, AÜHFD 2008,ss.253-283,s.278
  • Viner Charles, A General Abrıdgement Of Law And Equıty, London, 1742, 422–28

Year 2022, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 788 - 812, 30.12.2022

Emete Gözügüzelli

Abstract

References

  • Audrey, Davis, A Return To The Tradıtıonal Use Of The Wrıt Of Mandamus, Lewis & Clark Law review, Vol24.4, 2020,ss.1527-1548
  • Bamzaı,Adıtya, The Origins of Judicial Deference to Executive Interpretation, The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 126, No. 4 (Şubat 2017), ss. 908-1001
  • Control by Mandamus over Jurisdictional Mistake of Law, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 1, No. 4 (Ocak 1914), ss. 320-322
  • Dragan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration),21 Şubat 2003, (2003), 228 F.T.R. 52 (TD): Akt: Bellissimo, Mario
  • D., “Mandamus: A Compelling Remedy?”ss.1-17: https://www.cba.org/cba/cle/pdf/Bellissimo.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 15.01.2022)
  • E. R. S., Habeas Corpus as a Method of Review: Prohibition: Mandamus, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 41, No. 5 (Nisan 1943), ss. 937-943
  • Erhurman, Tufan, Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti İdari Yargılama Hukuku, Türk ve İngiliz Hukuk Sistemleriyle Karşılaştırmalı Bir İnceleme, Işık Kitapevi, Kıbrıs 2012,s.223.
  • Fenn Augustus H., Two Questions concerning Mandamus, The Yale Law Journal , Haziran 1893, Vol. 2, No. 6 (Ocak 1893), ss. 219-227,s.221
  • Gay - Torrence (1904) October 18, 1904, 144, 145,147: https://casetext.com/case/gay-v-torrance-2
  • Goodman, Leonard S., “Mandamus in the Colonies-The Rise of the Superintending Power of American Courts”, The
  • merican Journal of Legal History , Oct., 1957, Vol. 1, No. 4 (Oct., 1957), ss. 308-335,309-310.
  • Henderson, G., Foundations of English administrative law : certiorari and mandamus in the seventeenth century, Harvard University Press; London: Oxford University Press. 1963.s.127-42
  • In The Unıted States Court Of Appeals For The Nınth Cırcuıt, Case: 17-72917, 10/24/2017, ID: 10628844, DktEntry: 13, Page 1 of 234,s.10.
  • James E. Pfander, Marbury, Original Jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court’s Supervisory Powers, 101 COLUM. L. REV. 1515, 1525 (2001)
  • Mandamus In Admınıstratıve Actıons: Current Approaches, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 1973:15,ss.207-217,s.208
  • Mandamus, The Yale Law Journal , Apr., 1910, Vol. 19, No. 6 (Nisan 1910), ss. 462-465
  • Mandamus. Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the United States. Mandamus in Aid of Appellate Jurisdiction, Columbia Law Review, Şubat 1933, Vol. 33, No. 2 (Şubat 1933), ss. 366-368
  • Mandamus. Determination of Constitutionality Source: Columbia Law Review, Vol. 24, No. 3 (Mart 1924), ss. 317-318
  • Mandamus. Public School Authorities. Administrative Law, Columbia Law Review, Aralık 1921, Vol. 21, No. 8 (Dec., 1921), ss. 823-824
  • Mandamus. Revocation of Void License Granted by Mayor , Columbia Law Review, Vol. 28, No. 7 (Kasım 1928), ss. 979-980
  • Mandamus. Writ to Compel Recognition as Officer of Private Corporation. Mandamus , The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 32, No. 5 (Mar., 1923), ss. 503-504
  • Mandamus: When Issued, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 21, No. 7 (Mayıs, 1923), ss. 813-814
  • Necatigil, Zaim,Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti’nde Anayasa ve Yönetim Hukuku,Rüstem Kitapevi,İstanbul,1988,s.129
  • Revıew Of Prerogatıve Wrıts, Issues Paper/Law Commission, New Zeland.,Wellington 2008,ss.1-44,s.7
  • State v. Hurd Case (1895),USA Law, 47: https://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/supreme-court/1981/86-n-j-525-0.html
  • Tapping, Thomas, “The Law And Practıce Of The High Prerogative Writ Of Mandamus 2” (1853). s 56
  • Turhan, Turgut, Tarihsel Bakış Açısıyla Kıbrıs Türk Hukuk Sistemi, AÜHFD 2008,ss.253-283,s.278
  • Viner Charles, A General Abrıdgement Of Law And Equıty, London, 1742, 422–28
There are 28 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Law in Context
Journal Section Araştırma Makaleleri (Research Articles)
Authors

Emete Gözügüzelli 0000-0003-4659-3000

Publication Date December 30, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 5 Issue: 2

Cite

MLA Gözügüzelli, Emete. “MANDAMUS EMİRNAMESİ VE KIBRIS TÜRK HUKUKUNDAKİ YERİ”. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 5, no. 2, 2022, pp. 788-12.
 Download Cover Image

17742

Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.